Your Ad Here
Posts proudly displayed by Conservative Feeds

Saturday, August 30, 2008

5 Reasons Why Palin's Nomination Puts Obama In A Political Corner!

For the past Eight years, the media has successfully painted John McCain as the proverbial 'underdog' and lowered expectations. Today, the press seems genuinely shocked when time and time again McCain raises the bar and not only exceeds those expectations but blows them out of the water. They successfully painted his campaign as "dead" just year ago, yet today is the nominee of his party. They created such low expectations of his general election campaign, that they cannot explain how the polls are so incredibly tight. The media created a perception in the days prior to Saddleback that the forum would be an opportunity for Obama and highlight the lack of conservative support for McCain; once again Saddleback turned into a spurning board for McCain and Obama fell flat on his face. Finally, the MSMs seemed generally shocked yesterday when McCain broke their presumptions in choosing Sarah Palin as his Vice President and in November they will scramble when to explain how this 'underdog' won the election.

For those few of us who follow politics closely, there was surprise, but certainly no shock in the choice of Palin. In June, I wrote an article about Palin being vetted and continually stated that choosing Palin would be a stroke of genius. Bill Kristol, nearly every night for four months, on Fox News, sent a message that McCain should choose Palin, often times to chuckles from the other Pundits. McCain's choice in Palin, was a surprise, but not a shock and moreover will prove to put the Obama Campaign in the proverbial corner.

Obama did not choose Hillary Clinton for the VP slot, simply because he genuinely feels, as he has continually stated on the campaign trail, that John McCain is a closet sexist; opposed to equal pay and equal rights for women. Obama, the DNC, and their surrogates simply do not understand McCain and fully expected this election to be one of four men, one of which carried certain historical implications. The panic and quick negative attacks on Palin coming from the Obama campaign were the result of a campaign that believes their own hate-filled rhetoric and is genuinely angry that once again they were out-maneuvered by the McCain camp.

So why will Palin's VP selection become a problem for the Obama Campaign??

Why is Obama now backed into a corner??

First: The announcement, and genius behind the announcement, of McCain's selection dominated the headlines, media and Internet chatter yesterday. On a morning, in which Obama's nomination was expected to reach epic media proportions, McCain successfully stole the show. We will see what the implications are by the middle of the week, but if McCain's move halted or limited Obama's bump, then he is in trouble. Historically, Democratic Conventions have yielded a 15-16 point bump in the days after the nomination, yet if Obama's bump is limited and he never breaks the 50% barrier, then he is in deep trouble. This convention represented Obama's last best opportunity for a large bump, one that he never received following the primaries, Hillarys endorsement, his European vacation or announcement of his VP choice. If he cannot meet high expectations for a bump now, he has lost his best opportunity.

Second: The Heartland's Vision Of The American Dream. Sarah Palin brings to the table something that none of the other 3 candidates have: she truly represents what the silent majority of this nation views as the American Dream. Once you leave Urban areas of the East and West coast and you enter into the Rust Belt and Heartland of this nation, views change drastically. It is in the heartland of this nation where elections are decided, their views of the American Dream are significantly different than in the beltway or east or left coast; the views of the American Dream are much more traditional and Palin represents that tradition. The problem for Obama is that in order to overcome Palin, they must paint her as inexperienced. As a result, her biography will come to the forefront of every families table. Palin is a strong, attractive, middle class female, a mother of 5, and has risen from her Union-based middle-class roots to become the vice-Presidential nominee.

As America comes to know her they will learn about the Daughter of a dedicated teacher and the schools secretary. As a high-school basketball standout and Miss Congeniality in the Miss Alaska pageant she laid the groundwork for her popularity and success. She worked as a journalist, gave up her career to manage a fishery, became a devoted wife and devoted mother. Putting her family first, she coached sports teams, was an active manager in the schools PTA and eventually became a city council member, before moving on to become a mayor. When she ran for the Governor, she overcame her rival, a former Governor whose experience far outweighed her own. Yet, she won, carried out her message of reform; took on the Oil companies, corruption that existed within her own party and even the Federal Government and Senator Ted Stevens. She has raised 5 children, the youngest of which has Down's Syndrome, and after 2 years as Governor has an unheard of 80% approval rating. This is the biography that the heartland will connect with and the problem with Obama's attacks on her background.

Middle class Americans, regardless of how hard Obama worked, cannot and will not relate to someone who attended Harvard and Columbia, worked as a community organizer and has since pursued ever-increasing political power. To the heartland and middle class America, Palin represents someone who shares their devotion to family, has repeatedly succeeded in every pursuit she has undertaken, is the only candidate to actually managed within the private-sector and a small business, is a reformer, a sports enthusiast, and everything that their vision of the American Dream contains. Trust me, the more America learns of Sarah Palin, the more the so called "Soccer Mom", "Blue Collar", "Union Working", "Friday Night Football", "Apple Pie", "Middle Class" silent majority will come to look up to her. Obama, Biden, and their surrogates will never be able to overcome this perception and it will cost them when they attack her.

Third: Experience. It has already started, the attacks that she is "just a heartbeat away" and has no experience. But these attacks by the Obama campaign will ultimately not work. Why??

Simply put, every time that the Obama campaign questions her experience, it will inevitably lead to the questioning of his. For 17 months, and rightfully so, Obama has tried to overcome and avoid the experience issue. He has a ran on a campaign of change, downplaying the value of experience; but as they discuss Palin's "experience" they will only hurt themselves. After all, Palin is not a Presidential Candidate and Obama is. This is a huge benefit for McCain, he has painted the Obama campaign in a corner, because they cannot exploit Palin's inexperience without comparing it to his own; and if they try, they will have to make the argument that her private sector and family oriented successes do not matter, which ultimately leads to her biography and life story.

Fourth: Painting Her As A Radical. This has already started as well, and again it will not work. They will try to paint Palin as a right-wing radical and it has already started. But Palin has a record of genuine bi-partisanship and reform, something Obama does not have. She and the McCain campaign can point to 2 things: An 80% Approval Rating and her crackdown on corruption with Alaska's Republican Party. When the left attacks Palin, their appeals will only be heard by the people who have already drawn that conclusion; for the rest of America, who see a strong, well-spoken, and attractive Female, they won't buy it because her Rhetoric and Actions speak differently. Inevitably, painting her as a neo-con will lead back to her biography and life story.

Fifth: To Many Attacks. This will be the biggest problem for the Obama campaign and his supporters. If they attack Palin they will drive a wedge between temselves and both the Silent Majority of America and Clinton Supporters who faced relentless attacks and want reform within their own party.

For Clinton supporters, there are two issues in this election. First, they have seen corruption and manipulation of untold proportions within their own party and they want reform, this the Obama campaign will never understand. Secondly, they have seen a double standard by which they have been continuously painted as bitter, racist women, who in reality saw a level of misogyny in the primaries that was unheard of. The Obama campaign has decided that the best way to win back these votes was by attacking McCain as a sexist who did not support equal pay for Women. Yet, the selection of Palin, absolutely undermines that ridiculous attack; and despite policy differences, if the Obama campaign continues to attack Palin, it will stir up the memories of the Obama campaign's misongynistic attacks upon Hillary and drive Clinton voters away. This is the simple truth and there is no one who can deny it.

For the Silent Majority, the Palin family represents their own. These are the families in the heartland which work hard all week, put their family first and who see in the Palin family, traditional values and the traditional view of the American dream. The more the Obama campaign attacks Palin, the more the families of the rust belt and heartland will see this as an attack on their own family and it will drive them away. This is the simple truth and there is no one who can genuinely deny it.

These are the reasons why McCain's selection is phenomenal and will paint the Obama campaign into the proverbial corner. Americans vote for presidential candidates and their running mates based in a large part on likability. In this election, they see three candidates in Biden, Obama and even McCain who are all wealthy Senators, who all came from humble beginnings but who they cannot quite relate with. Sarah Palin and her family, represent the traditional view of the "American Dream", with humble beginnings, a uniquely middle-class lifestyle, a union based family, the PTA members next door, the girl next door, the outdoor enthusiasts, and every other cliche that you can use. The Obama campaign will attack Palin, and these attacks will prove to be the campaign's greatest strategic failure.

J Brown
August 30th, 2008

A SPECIAL MESSAGE On Behalf of my Daughter & Son:

Our school, a parochial school, is currently holding their annual fundraising drive through Innisbrook Wraps. InnisBrook offers a large variety of Gift Wraps, Scrapbooking, Fine Chocolates, Gifts, & Holiday Specialties. Please help us help our school in their fundraising efforts. Purchases made through Innisbrook in no way help this site, 100% of the proceeds are directed towards their school. If you have enjoyed our site, then please visit Innisbrook and consider a small purchase. Plus...My Daughter and Son get the credit.



Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article


Friday, August 29, 2008

FRIDAY COFFEE BREAK - FAMILY MOVIES, BOOKS, & READER OFFERS!

Friday Coffee Break - Our Weekly Break From Politics As Usual And A Reminder To Make Extra Time For Your Family. The Friday Coffee Break offers a needed distraction from politics and reviews family-centered books, movies and products.

This Week my Daughter has taken control of our weekend agenda after seeing a commercial for one of her favorite movies on ABC Family. So today's Friday Coffee Break will focus on a family classic and new classic.

With the lack of blockbuster movies planned to be released in 2009, Warner Brothers made the decision to move the release of the "big tent" blockbuster Harry Potter: The Half Blood Prince to next July from its scheduled November Release. As a result the movie Twilight, based upon the best-selling series will take the place of the Potter Movie. Twilight which is bound to be a blockbuster, provides a mixture of romance and sci-fi fantasy. The book series has been heralded as a remarkable feat in moving beyond the limitations of specific genres and crossing over a generational gap as it is beloved by droves of both pre-teens, teens and adults. But before you rush to see the movie, be sure to check out the books. There is no activity that sparks the imagination and creativity within our children outside of reading. You view reviews and buy the the Nationwide Bestsellers below.


A Weekend Movie for the entire family!

A timeless classic that even the male members of your family will have to admit they enjoy will be the feature of ABC Families Weekend. The Classic "The Sound Of Music" needs no review from me as we are all well aware of the plot and timeless themes that seek no hidden agenda's, seeks to make no political statements and represents a time in which Hollywood focused less on activism and more on entertainment. So please tune in, with a big bowl of popcorn and enjoy some quality time with a movie the entire family can enjoy.




Special Offers Just For Our Readers:
A SPECIAL MESSAGE On Behalf of my Daughter & Son:

Our school, a parochial school, is currently holding their annual fundraising drive through Innisbrook Wraps. InnisBrook offers a large variety of Gift Wraps, Scrapbooking, Fine Chocolates, Gifts, & Holiday Specialties. Please help us help our school in their fundraising efforts. Purchases made through Innisbrook in no way help this site, 100% of the proceeds are directed towards their school. If you have enjoyed our site, then please visit Innisbrook and consider a small purchase. Plus...My Daughter and Son get the credit.


PDOP is please to offer our readers the opportunity to obtain over 600 complimentary Industry magazines and Trade Publications. There is absolutely no cost, coupons or promo codes required to obtain these exciting publications. There is no credit card information because there is no payment. Now there is one catch, the publishers of these trade publications are only making this offer available to individuals working in the industry that they cover, including Financial Advisors, Internet Marketers, Website & Blog Developers and Publishers, Construction Industry, Retail industry and so much more. Take advantage today at absolutely NO COST.

To see the full range of free informational publications please visit our Free Industry resource center today to browse our selection of 600+ complimentary Industry magazines, white papers, webinars, podcasts, and more.

Have A Great Weekend!

Obamanomics In Illinois: State Announces Layoffs & Closure Of Parks & Historic Sites Thursday!

While Illinois' Senators, Obamis and Durbin, prepared for the party at Barackopolis; while Senator Obama's friend and mentors, Gover Rod Blagojevich and Emil Jones prepared for the party at the Barackopolis; state agencies in Illinois announce the layoff of an additional 325 State Of Illinois Employees and the closure of several state historic sites & State Parks including the Dana Thomas House in the capital city. It is ironic that after three days of Senator Obama, Senator Biden, and Michelle Obama tauting the strengths of Democratic accomplishments in Illinois, this announcement would come on the very day of Obama's acceptance speech.

On Thursday, the comptrollers office issued 325 layoff notices to Employees of the State including 179 employees who work for the Department of Children and Family Services. Governor Blagojevichs office blamed the cuts on the failure of the legislature, including the Senate controlled by Obama's Mentor Emil Jones, to pass a balanced budget. Of course, the State has failed during the past 6 years of Chicago-Based Democratic Control to pass a single balanced budget, in part due to the massive expansion of spending put forth by Blagojevich. Children's advocacy groups and the State Employees Union have both decried the decision by Illinois' unpopular governor.

Also included along-side the layoffs were the closure of 11 State Parks and 13 historic sites including the Frank-Lloyd Wright designed Dana-Thomas Home and Lincoln's Log Cabin located near Charleston, Illinois. In addition, President Lincoln's Tomb will now face shortnened hours and will only remain open 5 days a week.

To Learn More About the Senator Obama's policy successes in Illinois Please Read: Biden Lies: Working Families In Illinois Pay Less Taxes

J Brown
August 29th, 2008


Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Private Plane From Alask Lands In Ohio! CNN Speculates It May Be Palin

Rumors are flying this morning from CNN that a private plane from Alaska landed in Ohio overnight, fueling rumors that Sarah Palin may indeed be John McCain's Vice Presidential Pick. Palin, an extremely popular Governor of Alaska has long been my personal choice for Palin.

Palin will represent a tremendous problem for Obama considering the ongoing claim that he has levied against John McCain that he is opposed to women's right and equal pay. If Palin is the choice, I will gladly hand him a rag to wipe the egg from his face. It also represents a problem considering the millions of Clinton voters that felt that the Obama campaign launched mysogenistic attacks during the primaries.

CNN is reporting that last night at 10pm, a private airplane from Anchorage landed at a private airport outside of Dayton. According to reporters staked out at the airport, a woman and two teenagers, in the darkeness were immediately ushered into a SUV and driven away. An airport supervisor was quoted as stating that it was the most secretive flight he could ever remember.

UPDATE: Fox News Say Romney Has Said He Is Out! They Are Also Speculating It Is Palin!

UPDATE #2: ABC Reports Largely Debunked, based upon statements from Palin's Office early last night. MSNBC is clueless, still stating Liebermann is in the running?? CNBC & Chicago Tribune Both Reporting They Have Confirmed That Palin Is The VP Choice. I Guess We Will Find Out! Bad Morning For Obama!

UPDATE #3: Fox News - Backstage Sources Confiming That Palin IS THE VP! Woo Hoo!!!!!!

PALIN IT IS! BIG TROUBLE FOR THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN!!!

If Palin is choice it will make a great commercial considering attacks by Biden and Obama both in the past days stating John McCain opposes equal pay for women.

Let me know what you think.

J Brown
August 29th, 2008

Thursday, August 28, 2008

No Celebrity Here? Obama Campaign Hires Britney Spears' Set Designer To Build Invesco Stage!

I had to share this one. There is a justified irony in John McCain's celebrity add that featured images of Britney Spears and Paris Hilton. Today, The New York Post learned that the set designer of the Barackopolis at Invesco is none other than the set designer for....Britney Spears.

The stage, dubbed the Barackopolis by the GOP, was constructed under the supervision of Bobby Allen, Spear former stage-manager in charge of her last world tour. Adding to the fodder, Allen told the New York Post, “We’ve done Britney’s sets and a whole bunch of rock shows, but this was far more elaborate and complicated and we had to do it in far less time,” Allen said. “The biggest challenge has been making sure we don’t damage the playing field underneath.”

The Pun being slung by the RNC over the Greek-Tragedy has reached new proportions today as newspapers from London to Germany have printed stories about the strange resemblence to monuments dedicated to Greek and Roman Gods. The RNC has been sure to play up the event, as RNC Spokesman Danny Diaz told the Post, "It’s only appropriate that Barack Obama would descend down from the heavens and spend a little time with us mere mortals when accepting the Democratic nomination,” RNC spokesman Danny Diaz told the Post.

J Brown
August 28th, 2008



To see the full range of free informational publications please visit our Free Industry resource center today to browse our selection of 600+ complimentary Industry magazines, white papers, webinars, podcasts, and more.
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Franklin D. Roosevelt - July 2, 1932

I appreciate your willingness after these six arduous days to remain here, for I know well the sleepless hours which you and I have had. I regret that I am late, but I have no control over the winds of Heaven and could only be thankful for my Navy training.

The appearance before a National Convention of its nominee for President, to be formally notified of his selection, is unprecedented and unusual, but these are unprecedented and unusual times. I have started out on the tasks that lie ahead by breaking the absurd traditions that the candidate should remain in professed ignorance of what has happened for weeks until he is formally notified of that event many weeks later.

My friends, may this be the symbol of my intention to be honest and to avoid all hypocrisy or sham, to avoid all silly shutting of the eyes to the truth in this campaign. You have nominated me and I know it, and I am here to thank you for the honor.

Let it also be symbolic that in so doing I broke traditions. Let it be from now on the task of our Party to break foolish traditions. We will break foolish traditions and leave it to the Republican leadership, far more skilled in that art, to break promises.

Let us now and here highly resolve to resume the country's interrupted march along the path of real progress, of real justice, of real equality for all of our citizens, great and small. Our indomitable leader in that interrupted march is no longer with us, but there still survives today his spirit. Many of his captains, thank God, are still with us, to give us wise counsel. Let us feel that in everything we do there still lives with us, if not the body, the great indomitable, unquenchable, progressive soul of our Commander-in-Chief, Woodrow Wilson.

I have many things on which I want to make my position clear at the earliest possible moment in this campaign. That admirable document, the platform which you have adopted, is clear. I accept it 100 percent.

And you can accept my pledge that I will leave no doubt or ambiguity on where I stand on any question of moment in this campaign.

As we enter this new battle, let us keep always present with us some of the ideals of the Party: The fact that the Democratic Party by tradition and by the continuing logic of history, past and present, is the bearer of liberalism and of progress and at the same time of safety to our institutions. And if this appeal fails, remember well, my friends, that a resentment against the failure of Republican leadership--and note well that in this campaign I shall not use the word "Republican Party," but I shall use, day in and day out, the words, "Republican leadership"--the failure of Republican leaders to solve our troubles may degenerate into unreasoning radicalism.

The great social phenomenon of this depression, unlike others before it, is that it has produced but a few of the disorderly manifestations that too often attend upon such times.

Wild radicalism has made few converts, and the greatest tribute that I can pay to my countrymen is that in these days of crushing want there persists an orderly and hopeful spirit on the part of the millions of our people who have suffered so much. To fail to offer them a new chance is not only to betray their hopes but to misunderstand their patience.

To meet by reaction that danger of radicalism is to invite disaster. Reaction is no barrier to the radical. It is a challenge, a provocation. The way to meet that danger is to offer a workable program of reconstruction, and the party to offer it is the party with clean hands.

This, and this only, is a proper protection against blind reaction on the one hand and an improvised, hit-or-miss, irresponsible opportunism on the other.

There are two ways of viewing the Government's duty in matters affecting economic and social life. The first sees to it that a favored few are helped and hopes that some of their prosperity will leak through, sift through, to labor, to the farmer, to the small business man. That theory belongs to the party of Toryism, and I had hoped that most of the Tories left this country in 1776

But it is not and never will be the theory of the Democratic Party. This is no time for fear, for reaction or for timidity. Here and now I invite those nominal Republicans who find that their conscience cannot be squared with the groping and the failure of their party leaders to join hands with us; here and now, in equal measure, I warn those nominal Democrats who squint at the future with their faces turned toward the past, and who feel no responsibility to the demands of the new time, that they are out of step with their Party.

Yes, the people of this country want a genuine choice this year, not a choice between two names for the same reactionary doctrine. Ours must be a party of liberal thought, of planned action, of enlightened international outlook, and of the greatest good to the greatest number of our citizens.

Now it is inevitable--and the choice is that of the times--it is inevitable that the main issue of this campaign should revolve about the clear fact of our economic condition, a depression so deep that it is without precedent in modern history. It will not do merely to state, as do Republican leaders to explain their broken promises of continued inaction, that the depression is worldwide. That was not their explanation of the apparent prosperity of 1928. The people will not forget the claim made by them then that prosperity was only a domestic product manufactured by a Republican President and a Republican Congress. If they claim paternity for the one they cannot deny paternity for the other.

I cannot take up all the problems today. I want to touch on a few that are vital. Let us look a little at the recent history and the simple economics, the kind of economics that you and I and the average man and woman talk.

In the years before 1929 we know that this country had completed a vast cycle of building and inflation; for ten years we expanded on the theory of repairing the wastes of the War, but actually expanding far beyond that, and also beyond our natural and normal growth. Now it is worth remembering, and the cold figures of finance prove it, that during that time there was little or no drop in the prices that the consumer had to pay, although those same figures proved that the cost of production fell very greatly; corporate profit resulting from this period was enormous; at the same time little of that profit was devoted to the reduction of prices. The consumer was forgotten. Very little of it went into increased wages; the worker was forgotten, and by no means an adequate proportion was even paid out in dividends--the stockholder was forgotten.

And, incidentally, very little of it was taken by taxation to the beneficent Government of those years.

What was the result? Enormous corporate surpluses piled up-- the most stupendous in history. Where, under the spell of delirious speculation, did those surpluses go? Let us talk economics that the figures prove and that we can understand. Why, they went chiefly in two directions: first, into new and unnecessary plants which now stand stark and idle; and second, into the call-money market of Wall Street, either directly by the corporations, or indirectly through the banks. Those are the facts. Why blink at them?

Then came the crash. You know the story. Surpluses invested in unnecessary plants became idle. Men lost their jobs; purchasing power dried up; banks became frightened and started calling loans. Those who had money were afraid to part with it. Credit contracted. Industry stopped. Commerce declined, and unemployment mounted.

And there we are today.

Translate that into human terms. See how the events of the past three years have come home to specific groups of people: first, the group dependent on industry; second, the group dependent on agriculture; third, and made up in large part of members of the first two groups, the people who are called "small investors and depositors." In fact, the strongest possible tie between the first two groups, agriculture and industry, is the fact that the savings and to a degree the security of both are tied together in that third group--the credit structure of the Nation.

Never in history have the interests of all the people been so united in a single economic problem. Picture to yourself, for instance, the great groups of property owned by millions of our citizens, represented by credits issued in the form of bonds and mortgages--Government bonds of all kinds, Federal, State, county, municipal; bonds of industrial companies, of utility companies; mortgages on real estate in farms and cities, and finally the vast investments of the Nation in the railroads. What is the measure of the security of each of those groups? We know well that in our complicated, interrelated credit structure if any one of these credit groups collapses they may all collapse. Danger to one is danger to all.

How, I ask, has the present Administration in Washington treated the interrelationship of these credit groups? The answer is clear: It has not recognized that interrelationship existed at all. Why, the Nation asks, has Washington failed to understand that all of these groups, each and every one, the top of the pyramid and the bottom of the pyramid, must be considered together, that each and every one of them is dependent on every other; each and every one of them affecting the whole financial fabric?

Statesmanship and vision, my friends, require relief to all at the same time.

Just one word or two on taxes, the taxes that all of us pay toward the cost of Government of all kinds.

I know something of taxes. For three long years I have been going up and down this country preaching that Government--Federal and State and local--costs too much. I shall not stop that preaching. As an immediate program of action we must abolish useless offices. We must eliminate unnecessary functions of Government--functions, in fact, that are not definitely essential to the continuance of Government. We must merge, we must consolidate subdivisions of Government, and, like the private citizen, give up luxuries which we can no longer afford.

By our example at Washington itself, we shall have the opportunity of pointing the way of economy to local government, for let us remember well that out of every tax dollar in the average State in this Nation, 40 cents enter the treasury in Washington, D. C., 10 or 12 cents only go to the State capitals, and 48 cents are consumed by the costs of local government in counties and cities and towns.

I propose to you, my friends, and through you, that Government of all kinds, big and little, be made solvent and that the example be set by the President of the United States and his Cabinet.

And talking about setting a definite example, I congratulate this convention for having had the courage fearlessly to write into its declaration of principles what an overwhelming majority here assembled really thinks about the 18th Amendment. This convention wants repeal. Your candidate wants repeal. And I am confident that the United States of America wants repeal.

Two years ago the platform on which I ran for Governor the second time contained substantially the same provision. The overwhelming sentiment of the people of my State, as shown by the vote of that year, extends, I know, to the people of many of the other States. I say to you now that from this date on the 18th Amendment is doomed. When that happens, we as Democrats must and will, rightly and morally, enable the States to protect themselves against the importation of intoxicating liquor where such importation may violate their State laws. We must rightly and morally prevent the return of the saloon.

To go back to this dry subject of finance, because it all ties in together--the 18th Amendment has something to do with finance, too--in a comprehensive planning for the reconstruction of the great credit groups, including Government credit, I list an important place for that prize statement of principle in the platform here adopted calling for the letting in of the light of day on issues of securities, foreign and domestic, which are offered for sale to the investing public.

My friends, you and I as common-sense citizens know that it would help to protect the savings of the country from the dishonesty of crooks and from the lack of honor of some men in high financial places. Publicity is the enemy of crookedness.

And now one word about unemployment, and incidentally about agriculture. I have favored the use of certain types of public works as a further emergency means of stimulating employment and the issuance of bonds to pay for such public works, but I have pointed out that no economic end is served if we merely build without building for a necessary purpose. Such works, of course, should insofar as possible be self-sustaining if they are to be financed by the issuing of bonds. So as to spread the points of all kinds as widely as possible, we must take definite steps to shorten the working day and the working week.

Let us use common sense and business sense. Just as one example, we know that a very hopeful and immediate means of relief, both for the unemployed and for agriculture, will come from a wide plan of the converting of many millions of acres of marginal and unused land into timberland through reforestation. There are tens of millions of acres east of the Mississippi River alone in abandoned farms, in cut-over land, now growing up in worthless brush. Why, every European Nation has a definite land policy, and has had one for generations. We have none. Having none, we face a future of soil erosion and timber famine. It is clear that economic foresight and immediate employment march hand in hand in the call for the reforestation of these vast areas.

In so doing, employment can be given to a million men. That is the kind of public work that is self-sustaining, and therefore capable of being financed by the issuance of bonds which are made secure by the fact that the growth of tremendous crops will provide adequate security for the investment.

Yes, I have a very definite program for providing employment by that means. I have done it, and I am doing it today in the State of New York. I know that the Democratic Party can do it successfully in the Nation. That will put men to work, and that is an example of the action that we are going to have.

Now as a further aid to agriculture, we know perfectly well-- but have we come out and said so clearly and distinctly?--we should repeal immediately those provisions of law that compel the Federal Government to go into the market to purchase, to sell, to speculate in farm products in a futile attempt to reduce farm surpluses. And they are the people who are talking of keeping Government out of business. The practical way to help the farmer is by an arrangement that will, in addition to lightening some of the impoverishing burdens from his back, do something toward the reduction of the surpluses of staple commodities that hang on the market. It should be our aim to add to the world prices of staple products the amount of a reasonable tariff protection, to give agriculture the same protection that industry has today.

And in exchange for this immediately increased return I am sure that the farmers of this Nation would agree ultimately to such planning of their production as would reduce the surpluses and make it unnecessary in later years to depend on dumping those surpluses abroad in order to support domestic prices. That result has been accomplished in other Nations; why not in America, too?

Farm leaders and farm economists, generally, agree that a plan based on that principle is a desirable first step in the reconstruction of agriculture. It does not in itself furnish a complete program, but it will serve in great measure in the long run to remove the pall of a surplus without the continued perpetual threat of world dumping. Final voluntary reduction of surplus is a part of our objective, but the long continuance and the present burden of existing surpluses make it necessary to repair great damage of the present by immediate emergency measures.

Such a plan as that, my friends, does not cost the Government any money, nor does it keep the Government in business or in speculation.

As to the actual wording of a bill, I believe that the Democratic Party stands ready to be guided by whatever the responsible farm groups themselves agree on. That is a principle that is sound; and again I ask for action.

One more word about the farmer, and I know that every delegate in this hall who lives in the city knows why I lay emphasis on the farmer. It is because one-half of our population, over 50,000,000 people, are dependent on agriculture; and, my friends, if those 50,000,000 people have no money, no cash, to buy what is produced in the city, the city suffers to an equal or greater extent.

That is why we are going to make the voters understand this year that this Nation is not merely a Nation of independence, but it is, if we are to survive, bound to be a Nation of interdependence--town and city, and North and South, East and West. That is our goal, and that goal will be understood by the people of this country no matter where they live.

Yes, the purchasing power of that half of our population dependent on agriculture is gone. Farm mortgages reach nearly ten billions of dollars today and interest charges on that alone are $560,000,000 a year. But that is not all. The tax burden caused by extravagant and inefficient local government is an additional factor. Our most immediate concern should be to reduce the interest burden on these mortgages.

Rediscounting of farm mortgages under salutary restrictions must be expanded and should, in the future, be conditioned on the reduction of interest rates. Amortization payments, maturities should likewise in this crisis be extended before rediscount is permitted where the mortgagor is sorely pressed. That, my friends, is another example of practical, immediate relief: Action.

I aim to do the same thing, and it can be done, for the small home-owner in our cities and villages. We can lighten his burden and develop his purchasing power. Take away, my friends, that spectre of too high an interest rate. Take away that spectre of the due date just a short time away. Save homes; save homes for thousands of self-respecting families, and drive out that spectre of insecurity from our midst.

Out of all the tons of printed paper, out of all the hours of oratory, the recriminations, the defenses, the happy-thought plans in Washington and in every State, there emerges one great, simple, crystal-pure fact that during the past ten years a Nation of 120,000,000 people has been led by the Republican leaders to erect an impregnable barbed wire entanglement around its borders through the instrumentality of tariffs which have isolated us from all the other human beings in all the rest of the round world. I accept that admirable tariff statement in the platform of this convention. It would protect American business and American labor. By our acts of the past we have invited and received the retaliation of other Nations. I propose an invitation to them to forget the past, to sit at the table with us, as friends, and to plan with us for the restoration of the trade of the world.

Go into the home of the business man. He knows what the tariff has done for him. Go into the home of the factory worker. He knows why goods do not move. Go into the home of the farmer. He knows how the tariff has helped to ruin him.

At last our eyes are open. At last the American people are ready to acknowledge that Republican leadership was wrong and that the Democracy is right.

My program, of which I can only touch on these points, is based upon this simple moral principle: the welfare and the soundness of a Nation depend first upon what the great mass of the people wish and need; and second, whether or not they are getting it.

What do the people of America want more than anything else? To my mind, they want two things: work, with all the moral and spiritual values that go with it; and with work, a reasonable measure of security--security for themselves and for their wives and children. Work and security--these are more than words. They are more than facts. They are the spiritual values, the true goal toward which our efforts of reconstruction should lead. These are the values that this program is intended to gain; these are the values we have failed to achieve by the leadership we now have.

Our Republican leaders tell us economic laws--sacred, inviolable, unchangeable--cause panics which no one could prevent. But while they prate of economic laws, men and women are starving. We must lay hold of the fact that economic laws are not made by nature. They are made by human beings.

Yes, when--not if--when we get the chance, the Federal Government will assume bold leadership in distress relief. For years Washington has alternated between putting its head in the sand and saying there is no large number of destitute people in our midst who need food and clothing, and then saying the States should take care of them, if there are. Instead of planning two and a half years ago to do what they are now trying to do, they kept putting it off from day to day, week to week, and month to month, until the conscience of America demanded action.

I say that while primary responsibility for relief rests with localities now, as ever, yet the Federal Government has always had and still has a continuing responsibility for the broader public welfare. It will soon fulfill that responsibility.

And now, just a few words about our plans for the next four months. By coming here instead of waiting for a formal notification, I have made it clear that I believe we should eliminate expensive ceremonies and that we should set in motion at once, tonight, my friends, the necessary machinery for an adequate presentation of the issues to the electorate of the Nation.

I myself have important duties as Governor of a great State, duties which in these times are more arduous and more grave than at any previous period. Yet I feel confident that I shall be able to make a number of short visits to several parts of the Nation. My trips will have as their first objective the study at first hand, from the lips of men and women of all parties and all occupations, of the actual conditions and needs of every part of an interdependent country.

One word more: Out of every crisis, every tribulation, every disaster, mankind rises with some share of greater knowledge, of higher decency, of purer purpose. Today we shall have come through a period of loose thinking, descending morals, an era of selfishness, among individual men and women and among Nations. Blame not Governments alone for this. Blame ourselves in equal share. Let us be frank in acknowledgment of the truth that many amongst us have made obeisance to Mammon, that the profits of speculation, the easy road without toil, have lured us from the old barricades. To return to higher standards we must abandon the false prophets and seek new leaders of our own choosing.

Never before in modern history have the essential differences between the two major American parties stood out in such striking contrast as they do today. Republican leaders not only have failed in material things, they have failed in national vision, because in disaster they have held out no hope, they have pointed out no path for the people below to climb back to places of security and of safety in our American life.

Throughout the Nation, men and women, forgotten in the political philosophy of the Government of the last years look to us here for guidance and for more equitable opportunity to share in the distribution of national wealth.

On the farms, in the large metropolitan areas, in the smaller cities and in the villages, millions of our citizens cherish the hope that their old standards of living and of thought have not gone forever. Those millions cannot and shall not hope in vain.

I pledge you, I pledge myself, to a new deal for the American people. Let us all here assembled constitute ourselves prophets of a new order of competence and of courage. This is more than a political campaign; it is a call to arms. GivGive me your help, not to win votes alone, but to win in this crusade to restore America to its own people.

Franklin D. Roosevelt - July 2, 1932


Unlimited Video Game Rentals - Start Now!

Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Free Trade Publications For PDOP Readers!

PDOP is please to offer our readers the opportunity to obtain over 600 complimentary Industry magazines and Trade Publications. There is absolutely no cost, coupons or promo codes required to obtain these exciting publications. Now there is one catch, the publishers of these trade publications are only making this offer available to individuals working in the industry that they cover.

To see the full range of free informational publications please visit our Free Industry resource center today to browse our selection of 600+ complimentary Industry magazines, white papers, webinars, podcasts, and more. Get popular titles including:

Student Group Tour Magazine
T.H.E. Journal
Moody\'s Economy.com - Into the Woods: Mortgage Credit Quality, Its Prospects and Implications

No credit cards, coupons, or promo codes required. Try it today!




Theodore Roosevelt - March 4, 1905

President Roosevelt was never formally nominated by the Republican Party. Therefore, here is TR's inaugural address in 1905.

No people on earth have more cause to be thankful than ours, and this is said reverently, in no spirit of boastfulness in our own strength, but with gratitude to the Giver of Good who has blessed us with the conditions which have enabled us to achieve so large a measure of well-being and of happiness. To us as a people it has been granted to lay the foundations of our national life in a new continent. We are the heirs of the ages, and yet we have had to pay few of the penalties which in old countries are exacted by the dead hand of a bygone civilization. We have not been obliged to fight for our existence against any alien race; and yet our life has called for the vigor and effort without which the manlier and hardier virtues wither away. Under such conditions it would be our own fault if we failed; and the success which we have had in the past, the success which we confidently believe the future will bring, should cause in us no feeling of vainglory, but rather a deep and abiding realization of all which life has offered us; a full acknowledgment of the responsibility which is ours; and a fixed determination to show that under a free government a mighty people can thrive best, alike as regards the things of the body and the things of the soul.

Much has been given us, and much will rightfully be expected from us. We have duties to others and duties to ourselves; and we can shirk neither. We have become a great nation, forced by the fact of its greatness into relations with the other nations of the earth, and we must behave as beseems a people with such responsibilities. Toward all other nations, large and small, our attitude must be one of cordial and sincere friendship. We must show not only in our words, but in our deeds, that we are earnestly desirous of securing their good will by acting toward them in a spirit of just and generous recognition of all their rights. But justice and generosity in a nation, as in an individual, count most when shown not by the weak but by the strong. While ever careful to refrain from wrongdoing others, we must be no less insistent that we are not wronged ourselves. We wish peace, but we wish the peace of justice, the peace of righteousness. We wish it because we think it is right and not because we are afraid. No weak nation that acts manfully and justly should ever have cause to fear us, and no strong power should ever be able to single us out as a subject for insolent aggression.

Our relations with the other powers of the world are important; but still more important are our relations among ourselves. Such growth in wealth, in population, and in power as this nation has seen during the century and a quarter of its national life is inevitably accompanied by a like growth in the problems which are ever before every nation that rises to greatness. Power invariably means both responsibility and danger. Our forefathers faced certain perils which we have outgrown. We now face other perils, the very existence of which it was impossible that they should foresee. Modern life is both complex and intense, and the tremendous changes wrought by the extraordinary industrial development of the last half century are felt in every fiber of our social and political being. Never before have men tried so vast and formidable an experiment as that of administering the affairs of a continent under the forms of a Democratic republic. The conditions which have told for our marvelous material well-being, which have developed to a very high degree our energy, self-reliance, and individual initiative, have also brought the care and anxiety inseparable from the accumulation of great wealth in industrial centers. Upon the success of our experiment much depends, not only as regards our own welfare, but as regards the welfare of mankind. If we fail, the cause of free self-government throughout the world will rock to its foundations, and therefore our responsibility is heavy, to ourselves, to the world as it is to-day, and to the generations yet unborn. There is no good reason why we should fear the future, but there is every reason why we should face it seriously, neither hiding from ourselves the gravity of the problems before us nor fearing to approach these problems with the unbending, unflinching purpose to solve them aright.

Yet, after all, though the problems are new, though the tasks set before us differ from the tasks set before our fathers who founded and preserved this Republic, the spirit in which these tasks must be undertaken and these problems faced, if our duty is to be well done, remains essentially unchanged. We know that self-government is difficult. We know that no people needs such high traits of character as that people which seeks to govern its affairs aright through the freely expressed will of the freemen who compose it. But we have faith that we shall not prove false to the memories of the men of the mighty past. They did their work, they left us the splendid heritage we now enjoy. We in our turn have an assured confidence that we shall be able to leave this heritage unwasted and enlarged to our children and our children's children. To do so we must show, not merely in great crises, but in the everyday affairs of life, the qualities of practical intelligence, of courage, of hardihood, and endurance, and above all the power of devotion to a lofty ideal, which made great the men who founded this Republic in the days of Washington, which made great the men who preserved this Republic in the days of Abraham Lincoln.

Theodore Roosevelt - March 4th, 1905


Trust LegalMatch to find you the RIGHT Lawyer!

Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

John F. Kennedy - July 15, 1960

Governor Stevenson, Senator Johnson, Mr. Butler, Senator Symington, Senator Humphrey, Speaker Rayburn, fellow Democrats, I want to express my thanks to Governor Stevenson for his generous and heart-warming introduction.

It was my great honor to place his name in nomination at the 1956 Democratic Convention, and I am delighted to have his support and his counsel and his advice in the coming months ahead.

Let me say first that I accept the nomination of the Democratic Party.

I accept it without reservation and with only one obligation, the obligation to devote every effort of my mind and spirit to lead our Party back to victory and our Nation to greatness.

I am grateful, too -- I am grateful, too that you have provided us with such a strong platform to stand on and to run on. Pledges which are made so eloquently are made to be kept. "The Rights of Man" -- the civil and economic rights essential to the human dignity of all men -- are indeed our goal and are indeed our first principle. This is a Platform on which I can run with enthusiasm and with conviction.

And I am grateful, finally, that I can rely in the coming months on many others: On a distinguished running-mate who brings unity and strength to our Platform and our ticket, Lyndon Johnson; on one of the most articulate spokesmen of modern times, Adlai Stevenson; on a great fighter -- on a great fighter for our needs as a Nation and a people, Stuart Symington; on my traveling companion in Wisconsin and West Virginia, Senator Hubert Humphrey; on Paul Butler, our devoted and courageous Chairman; and on that fighting campaigner whose support I now welcome, President Harry Truman.

I feel a lot safer with all of them on my side. And I'm proud of the contrast with our Republican competitors. For their ranks are so thin that not one challenger has dared to put his head up in the last twelve months.

I am fully aware of the fact that the Democratic Party, by nominating someone of my faith, has taken on what many regard as a new and hazardous risk -- new, at least since 1928. The Democratic Party has once again placed its confidence in the American people, and in their ability to render a free and fair judgment and in my ability to render a free and fair judgment.

To uphold the Constitution and my oath of office, to reject any kind of religious pressure or obligation that might directly or indirectly interfere with my conduct of the Presidency in the national interest. My record of fourteen years in supporting public education, supporting complete separation of Church and State and resisting pressure from sources of any kind should be clear by now to everyone.

I hope that no American -- I hope that no American, considering the really critical issues facing this country, will waste his franchise and throw away his vote by voting either for me or against me because of my religious affiliation. It is not relevant.

I am telling you what you are entitled to know: As I come before you seeking your support for the most powerful office in the free world -- I am saying to you that my decisions on every public policy will be my own, as an American, as a Democrat, and as a free man.

I mention all of this only because this country faces so many serious challenges, so many great opportunities, so many burdensome responsibilities that I hope that it is to those great matters that we can address ourselves in the coming months. And if this statement of mine makes it easier to concentrate on our Nation's problems, then I'm glad that I have made it.

Under any circumstances, the victory we seek in November will not be easy. We know that in our hearts. We know that our opponent will invoke the name of Abraham Lincoln on behalf of their candidate, despite the fact that his political career has often seemed to show charity towards none and malice for all.

We know it will not be easy to campaign against a man who has spoken and voted on every side of every issue. Mr. Nixon may feel that it's his turn now, after the New Deal and the Fair Deal --but before he deals, someone's going to cut the cards.

That "someone" may be the millions of Americans who voted for President Eisenhower but would balk at his successor.

For just as historians tell us that Richard the First was not fit to fill the shoes of the bold Henry the Second, and that Richard Cromwell was not fit to wear the mantle of his uncle, they might add in future years that Richard Nixon did not measure up to the footsteps of Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Perhaps he could carry on the party policies, the policies of Nixon and Benson and Dirksen and Goldwater. But this Nation cannot afford such a luxury. Perhaps we could afford a Coolidge following Harding. And perhaps we could afford a Pierce following Fillmore. But after Buchanan this nation needed Lincoln; after Taft we needed Wilson; and after Hoover we needed Franklin Roosevelt.

But we're not merely running against Mr. Nixon. Our task is not merely one of itemizing Republican failures. Nor is that wholly necessary. For the families forced from the farm do not need to tell us of their plight. The unemployed miners and textile workers know that the decision is before them in November. The old people without medical care, the families without a decent home, the parents of children without a decent school: They all know that it's time for a change.

We are not here to curse the darkness; we are here to light a candle. As Winston Churchill said on taking office some twenty years ago: If we open a quarrel between the present and the past, we shall be in danger of losing the future.

Today our concern must be with that future. For the world is changing. The old era is ending. The old ways will not do.

Abroad, the balance of power is shifting. New and more terrible weapons are coming into use.

One-third of the world may be free, but one-third is the victim of a cruel repression, and the other third is rocked by poverty and hunger and disease. Communist influence has penetrated into Asia; it stands in the Middle East; and now festers some ninety miles off the coast of Florida. Friends have slipped into neutrality and neutrals have slipped into hostility. As our keynoter reminded us, the President who began his career by going to Korea ends it by staying away from Japan.

The world has been close to war before, but now man, who's survived all previous threats to his existence, has taken into his mortal hands the power to exterminate his species seven times over.

Here at home the future is equally revolutionary. The New Deal and the Fair Deal were bold measures for their generations, but now this is a new generation.

A technological output and explosion on the farm has led to an output explosion. An urban population revolution has overcrowded our schools and cluttered our cities and crowded our slums.

A peaceful revolution for human rights, demanding an end to racial discrimination in all parts of our community life, has strained at the leashes imposed by a timid executive leadership.

It is time, in short -- It is time, in short for a new generation of leadership. All over the world, particularly in the newer nations, young men are coming to power, men who are not bound by the traditions of the past, men who are not blinded by the old fears and hates and rivalries-- young men who can cast off the old slogans and the old delusions.

The Republican nominee, of course, is a young man. But his approach is as old as McKinley. His party is the party of the past, the party of memory. His speeches are generalities from Poor Richard's Almanac. Their platform -- Their platform, made up of old, left-over Democratic planks, has the courage of our old convictions. Their pledge is to the status quo; and today there is no status quo.

For I stand here tonight facing west on what was once the last frontier. From the lands that stretch three thousand miles behind us, the pioneers gave up their safety, their comfort and sometimes their lives to build our new West. They were not the captives of their own doubts, nor the prisoners of their own price tags. They were determined to make the new world strong and free -- an example to the world, to overcome its hazards and its hardships, to conquer the enemies that threatened from within and without.

Some would say that those struggles are all over, that all the horizons have been explored, that all the battles have been won, that there is no longer an American frontier. But I trust that no one in this assemblage would agree with that sentiment; for the problems are not all solved and the battles are not all won; and we stand today on the edge of a New Frontier -- the frontier of the 1960's, the frontier of unknown opportunities and perils, the frontier of unfilled hopes and unfilled threats.

Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom promised our nation a new political and economic framework. Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal promised security and succor to those in need. But the New Frontier of which I speak is not a set of promises. It is a set of challenges.

It sums up not what I intend to offer to the American people, but what I intend to ask of them. It appeals to their pride -- It appeals to our pride, not our security. It holds out the promise of more sacrifice instead of more security.

The New Frontier is here whether we seek it or not.

Beyond that frontier are uncharted areas of science and space, unsolved problems of peace and war, unconquered problems of ignorance and prejudice, unanswered questions of poverty and surplus. It would be easier to shrink from that new frontier, to look to the safe mediocrity of the past, to be lulled by good intentions and high rhetoric -- and those who prefer that course should not vote for me or the Democratic Party.

But I believe that the times require imagination and courage and perseverance. I'm asking each of you to be pioneers towards that New Frontier. My call is to the young in heart, regardless of age--to the stout in spirit, regardless of Party, to all who respond to the scriptural call: "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be [thou] dismayed."

For courage , not complacency, is our need today; leadership, not salesmanship. And the only valid test of leadership is the ability to lead, and lead vigorously. A tired nation -- A tired nation, said David Lloyd George, is a Tory nation. And the United States today cannot afford to be either tired or Tory.

There may be those who wish to hear more -- more promises to this group or that, more harsh rhetoric about the men in the Kremlin as a substitute for policy, more assurances of a golden future, where taxes are always low and the subsidies are always high. But my promises are in the platform that you have adopted. Our ends will not be won by rhetoric, and we can have faith in the future only if we have faith in ourselves.

For the harsh facts of the matter are that we stand at this frontier at a turning-point of history. We must prove all over again to a watching world, as we said on a most conspicuous stage, whether this nation, conceived as it is with its freedom of choice, its breadth of opportunity, its range of alternatives, can compete with the single-minded advance of the Communist system.

Can a nation organized and governed such as ours endure?

That is the real question.

Have we the nerve and the will? Can we carry through in an age where we will witness not only new breakthroughs in weapons of destruction, but also a race for mastery of the sky and the rain, the ocean and the tides, the far side of space, and the inside of men's minds?

That is the question of the New Frontier.

That is the choice our nation must make -- a choice that lies not merely between two men or two parties, but between the public interest and private comfort, between national greatness and national decline, between the fresh air of progress and the stale, dank atmosphere of "normalcy," between dedication of mediocrity.

All mankind waits upon our decision. A whole world looks to see what we shall do. And we cannot fail that trust. And we cannot fail to try.

It has been a long road from the first snowy day in New Hampshire many months ago to this crowded convention city. Now begins another long journey, taking me into your cities and homes across the United States.

Give me your help and your hand and your voice.

Recall with me the words of Isaiah that, "They that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run and not be weary."

As we face the coming great challenge, we too, shall wait upon the Lord, and ask that He renew our strength.

Then shall we be equal to the test.

Then we shall not be weary.

Then we shall prevail.

Thank you.

John F. Kennedy - July 15, 1960



Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Biden's Outright Lie - 'Working Families in Illinois Pay Less Taxes! '

Joe Biden seems to want to discuss Barack Obama's accomplishments in Illinois, but perhaps Joe Biden has failed to recognize the the fiscal and economic health of Illinois is far from perfect and in 'shambles' after years of control by the same Chicago Political Machine that produced Senator Obama.

According to Biden, "Because Barack made that choice, 150,000 more children and parents have health care in Illinois. He fought to make that happen. And because Barack made that choice, working families in Illinois pay less taxes and more people have moved from welfare to the dignity of work. He got it done."

First, it was a Republican Governor, George Ryan who first started the ball rolling on the Children's Healthcare programs in Illinois. Ryan's KidCare initiative paved the path for Governor Blagojevichs expansion of the program later. Senator Obama played no roll in shaping the legislation, but if we wishes to receive the credit then he should also share disadvantages to how these programs came about. Governor Ryan came into office on the coat-tails of a popular down-state Republican Governor, but immediately after obtaining office he broke nearly every campaign promise by instituting massive new government spending and squandering the State's surplus. As a result, when his KidCare initiative was instituted at a time when the state was operating in deficits, Ryan tried to offset his drunken spending by doubling and sometimes tripling Professional Fees, Licensing Fees, and Operating Fees across the board on Illinois Businesses and Professionals. Just two years later when the soon to be indicted Ryan was replaced by Obama's friend Rod Blagojevich, he would promise to restore fiscal health to Illinois while at the same time promising a massive new expansion of social spending. Sound Familiar???

So what happened when Blagojevich and his Chicago buddies, including Obama, took the reigns in Illinois. Simple, facing a massive deficit during his first year in office, the Governor, with the support of Barack Obama, proposed over $1 billion in new spending, followed by similar increases in every year since. How did he pay for this new spending, he didn't raise income taxes; but... Blagojevich, with no objections from Obama, doubled, tripled and sometimes quadrupled the professional licensing fees of businesses and individuals in Illinois. For myself, my professional fees in Illinois doubled during Ryan's administration, and then tripled just 2 years later thanks Blago. There was no industry or professional that was left untouched, every person operating in Illinois from Auto Dealerships, Truckers, Gas Stations, Doctors, Nurses, Insurance Agents, Hair Dressers, EVERYONE WAS SLAPPED WITH HIGHER FEES.

In 2003, after Blago came to power, in an effort to balance the budget and fund his $1 billion in new spending, the governor with the backing of Obama, decided to issue bonding authority to offset $10 billion of unfunded Teachers Pension System Obligations. Illinois Republicans, joined by teachers unions and taxpayer advocacy groups attempted to block the move and force the state to continue to fulfill it's obligations without indebting the Teachers Pension Plan. The attempt was over-ridden by Blago and Obama's Chicago contingency and 5 years later the State still is barely able to pay the interests on the bonds, let alone determine how they will pay back the debt they tied to Teachers Pensions. Less than 2 years later, these same Chicago Politician would pass legislation essentially capping and penalizing school districts who offered pay raises to Illinois teachers during their final years prior to retirement. Obama said nothing.

It is true that with a 3% Income Tax Rate, Illinois does have a reasonable income tax system. However, Illinois has one of the highest sales tax rates in the nation, and the city of Chicago now enjoys the HIGHEST SALES TAX RATE IN THE NATION at over 10%. Since the retirement of Governor Edgar, Illinois has consistently ranked at in the bottom 20% of all States for Economic Growth. The Governor who ran on an identical platform as Obama, riding the coat-tails of an unpopular and damaging Republican Governor, has failed in 6 years to control Government spending, balance the budget, protect the jobs of Govt. employees, control taxation, and reign in corruption. This Governor, backed and supported by Obama, has not delivered the transparent government he promised. Blago, Obama, Jones and their corrupt Chicago colleagues have ran government from the proverbial "smoke-filled back room".

Obama showed no leadership in Illinois, he did not play an influential role in passing Illinois' health care programs; programs that have been considered a failure and whose enrollment is only 10% of what was expected. Obama's Chicago buddies are proud to taut his support for this health care program, yet while they taut this plan, the Chicago Democrats have cut health benefits to their own State Employees.

Illinois citizens do not enjoy low taxes when you consider the higher costs of goods and services driven by increases in the State's Sales tax (including Chicago's record breaking sales tax) and massive increases in the licensing and operating fees paid by professionals and businesses alike.

Obama's Illinois is not the model of Government that anyone should want to adopt in their state, let alone in Washington DC. If you want to see how Obamis would rule, then I urge you to look at Illinois Government. Look at the current Governor, a man who has divided his own political party; a man who will not run and could not run for re-election; a man who campaigned on a platform identical to that of Obamis and failed to live up to any of his hope and change promises; a man who will join the ranks of many of Illinois' former Governors when he is indicted when he leaves office; a man whose friend, Obamis, fully supported and adopted his policies and campaign platform.

J Brown
August 28th, 2008


Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Ronald Reagan - July 17, 1980

Today is a day to celebrate the greatest leaders of the past century, leaders who spoke from their heart, not from the Parthenon. Throughout the day I will be posting the acceptance speeched of the truly great leaders of the past century, you can make your own comparisons of their words to that of 'Obamis'. Please return throughout the day for speeches by John F. Kennedy, Harry Truman, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Theodore Roosevelt.

July 17th, 1980

Mr. Chairman, Mr. Vice President to be, this convention, my fellow citizens of this great nation:

With a deep awareness of the responsibility conferred by your trust, I accept your nomination for the presidency of the United States. I do so with deep gratitude, and I think also I might interject on behalf of all of us, our thanks to Detroit and the people of Michigan and to this city for the warm hospitality they have shown. And I thank you for your wholehearted response to my recommendation in regard to George Bush as a candidate for vice president.

I am very proud of our party tonight. This convention has shown to all America a party united, with positive programs for solving the nation's problems; a party ready to build a new consensus with all those across the land who share a community of values embodied in these words: family, work, neighborhood, peace and freedom.

I know we have had a quarrel or two, but only as to the method of attaining a goal. There was no argument about the goal. As president, I will establish a liaison with the 50 governors to encourage them to eliminate, where it exists, discrimination against women. I will monitor federal laws to insure their implementation and to add statutes if they are needed.

More than anything else, I want my candidacy to unify our country; to renew the American spirit and sense of purpose. I want to carry our message to every American, regardless of party affiliation, who is a member of this community of shared values.

Never before in our history have Americans been called upon to face three grave threats to our very existence, any one of which could destroy us. We face a disintegrating economy, a weakened defense and an energy policy based on the sharing of scarcity.

The major issue of this campaign is the direct political, personal and moral responsibility of Democratic Party leadership --i n the White House and in Congress -- for this unprecedented calamity which has befallen us. They tell us they have done the most that humanly could be done. They say that the United States has had its day in the sun; that our nation has passed its zenith. They expect you to tell your children that the American people no longer have the will to cope with their problems; that the future will be one of sacrifice and few opportunities.

My fellow citizens, I utterly reject that view. The American people, the most generous on earth, who created the highest standard of living, are not going to accept the notion that we can only make a better world for others by moving backwards ourselves. Those who believe we can have no business leading the nation.

I will not stand by and watch this great country destroy itself under mediocre leadership that drifts from one crisis to the next, eroding our national will and purpose. We have come together here because the American people deserve better from those to whom they entrust our nation's highest offices, and we stand united in our resolve to do something about it.

We need rebirth of the American tradition of leadership at every level of government and in private life as well. The United States of America is unique in world history because it has a genius for leaders -- many leaders -- on many levels. But, back in 1976, Mr. Carter said, "Trust me." And a lot of people did. Now, many of those people are out of work. Many have seen their savings eaten away by inflation. Many others on fixed incomes, especially the elderly, have watched helplessly as the cruel tax of inflation wasted away their purchasing power. And, today, a great many who trusted Mr. Carter wonder if we can survive the Carter policies of national defense.

"Trust me" government asks that we concentrate our hopes and dreams on one man; that we trust him to do what's best for us. My view of government places trust not in one person or one party, but in those values that transcend persons and parties. The trust is where it belongs--in the people. The responsibility to live up to that trust is where it belongs, in their elected leaders. That kind of relationship, between the people and their elected leaders, is a special kind of compact.

Three hundred and sixty years ago, in 1620, a group of families dared to cross a mighty ocean to build a future for themselves in a new world. When they arrived at Plymouth, Massachusetts, they formed what they called a "compact"; an agreement among themselves to build a community and abide by its laws.

The single act--the voluntary binding together of free people to live under the law--set the pattern for what was to come.

A century and a half later, the descendants of those people pledged their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to found this nation. Some forfeited their fortunes and their lives; none sacrificed honor.

Four score and seven years later, Abraham Lincoln called upon the people of all America to renew their dedication and their commitment to a government of, for and by the people.

Isn't it once again time to renew our compact of freedom; to pledge to each other all that is best in our lives; all that gives meaning to them--for the sake of this, our beloved and blessed land?

Together, let us make this a new beginning. Let us make a commitment to care for the needy; to teach our children the values and the virtues handed down to us by our families; to have the courage to defend those values and the willingness to sacrifice for them.

Let us pledge to restore, in our time, the American spirit of voluntary service, of cooperation, of private and community initiative; a spirit that flows like a deep and mighty river through the history of our nation.

As your nominee, I pledge to restore to the federal government the capacity to do the people's work without dominating their lives. I pledge to you a government that will not only work well, but wisely; its ability to act tempered by prudence and its willingness to do good balanced by the knowledge that government is never more dangerous than when our desire to have it help us blinds us to its great power to harm us.

The first Republican president once said, "While the people retain their virtue and their vigilance, no administration by any extreme of wickedness or folly can seriously injure the government in the short space of four years."

If Mr. Lincoln could see what's happened in these last three-and-a-half years, he might hedge a little on that statement. But, with the virtues that our legacy as a free people and with the vigilance that sustains liberty, we still have time to use our renewed compact to overcome the injuries that have been done to America these past three-and-a-half years.

First, we must overcome something the present administration has cooked up: a new and altogether indigestible economic stew, one part inflation, one part high unemployment, one part recession, one part runaway taxes, one party deficit spending and seasoned by an energy crisis. It's an economic stew that has turned the national stomach.

Ours are not problems of abstract economic theory. Those are problems of flesh and blood; problems that cause pain and destroy the moral fiber of real people who should not suffer the further indignity of being told by the government that it is all somehow their fault. We do not have inflation because -- as Mr. Carter says -- we have lived too well.

The head of a government which has utterly refused to live within its means and which has, in the last few days, told us that this year's deficit will be $60 billion, dares to point the finger of blame at business and labor, both of which have been engaged in a losing struggle just trying to stay even.

High taxes, we are told, are somehow good for us, as if, when government spends our money it isn't inflationary, but when we spend it, it is.

Those who preside over the worst energy shortage in our history tell us to use less, so that we will run out of oil, gasoline, and natural gas a little more slowly. Conservation is desirable, of course, for we must not waste energy. But conservation is not the sole answer to our energy needs.

America must get to work producing more energy. The Republican program for solving economic problems is based on growth and productivity.

Large amounts of oil and natural gas lay beneath our land and off our shores, untouched because the present administration seems to believe the American people would rather see more regulation, taxes and controls than more energy.

Coal offers great potential. So does nuclear energy produced under rigorous safety standards. It could supply electricity for thousands of industries and millions of jobs and homes. It must not be thwarted by a tiny minority opposed to economic growth which often finds friendly ears in regulatory agencies for its obstructionist campaigns.

Make no mistake. We will not permit the safety of our people or our environment heritage to be jeopardized, but we are going to reaffirm that the economic prosperity of our people is a fundamental part of our environment.

Our problems are both acute and chronic, yet all we hear from those in positions of leadership are the same tired proposals for more government tinkering, more meddling and more control -- all of which led us to this state in the first place.

Can anyone look at the record of this administration and say, "Well done?" Can anyone compare the state of our economy when the Carter Administration took office with where we are today and say, "Keep up the good work?" Can anyone look at our reduced standing in the world today and say, "Let's have four more years of this?"

I believe the American people are going to answer these questions the first week of November and their answer will be, "No--we've had enough." And, then it will be up to us -- beginning next January 20th -- to offer an administration and congressional leadership of competence and more than a little courage.

We must have the clarity of vision to see the difference between what is essential and what is merely desirable, and then the courage to bring our government back under control and make it acceptable to the people.

It is essential that we maintain both the forward momentum of economic growth and the strength of the safety net beneath those in society who need help. We also believe it is essential that the integrity of all aspects of Social Security are preserved.

Beyond these essentials, I believe it is clear our federal government is overgrown and overweight. Indeed, it is time for our government to go on a diet. Therefore, my first act as chief executive will be to impose an immediate and thorough freeze on federal hiring. Then, we are going to enlist the very best minds from business, labor and whatever quarter to conduct a detailed review of every department, bureau and agency that lives by federal appropriations. We are also going to enlist the help and ideas of many dedicated and hard working government employees at all levels who want a more efficient government as much as the rest of us do. I know that many are demoralized by the confusion and waste they confront in their work as a result of failed and failing policies.

Our instructions to the groups we enlist will be simple and direct. We will remind them that government programs exist at the sufferance of the American taxpayer and are paid for with money earned by working men and women. Any program that represents a waste of their money -- a theft from their pocketbooks--must have that waste eliminated or the program must go -- by executive order where possible; by congressional action where necessary. Everything that can be run more effectively by state and local government we shall turn over to state and local government, along with the funding sources to pay for it. We are going to put an end to the money merry-go-round where our money becomes Washington's money, to be spent by the states and cities exactly the way the federal bureaucrats tell them to.

I will not accept the excuse that the federal government has grown so big and powerful that it is beyond the control of any president, any administration or Congress. We are going to put an end to the notion that the American taxpayer exists to fund the federal government. The federal government exists to serve the American people. On January 20th, we are going to re-establish that truth.

Also on that date we are going to initiate action to get substantial relief for our taxpaying citizens and action to put people back to work. None of this will be based on any new form of monetary tinkering or fiscal sleight-of-hand. We will simply apply to government the common sense we all use in our daily lives.

Work and family are at the center of our lives; the foundation of our dignity as a free people. When we deprive people of what they have earned, or take away their jobs, we destroy their dignity and undermine their families. We cannot support our families unless there are jobs; and we cannot have jobs unless people have both money to invest and the faith to invest it.

There are concepts that stem from an economic system that for more than 200 years has helped us master a continent, create a previously undreamed of prosperity for our people and has fed millions of others around the globe. That system will continue to serve us in the future if our government will stop ignoring the basic values on which it was built and stop betraying the trust and good will of the American workers who keep it going.

The American people are carrying the heaviest peacetime tax burden in our nation's history -- and it will grow even heavier, under present law, next January. We are taxing ourselves into economic exhaustion and stagnation, crushing our ability and incentive to save, invest and produce.

This must stop. We must halt this fiscal self-destruction and restore sanity to our economic system.

I have long advocated a 30 percent reduction in income tax rates over a period of three years. This phased tax reduction would begin with a 10 percent "down payment" tax cut in 1981, which the Republicans and Congress and I have already proposed.

A phased reduction of tax rates would go a long way toward easing the heavy burden on the American people. But, we should not stop here.

Within the context of economic conditions and appropriate budget priorities during each fiscal year of my presidency, I would strive to go further. This would include improvement in business depreciation taxes so we can stimulate investment in order to get plants and equipment replaced, put more Americans back to work and put our nation back on the road to being competitive in world commerce. We will also work to reduce the cost of government as a percentage of our gross national product.

The first task of national leadership is to set honest and realistic priorities in our policies and our budget and I pledge that my administration will do that.

When I talk of tax cuts, I am reminded that every major tax cut in this century has strengthened the economy, generated renewed productivity and ended up yielding new revenues for the government by creating new investment, new jobs and more commerce among our people.

The present administration has been forced by us Republicans to play follow-the-leader with regard to a tax cut. But, in this election year we must take with the proverbial "grain of salt" any tax cut proposed by those who have given us the greatest tax increase in our history. When those in leadership give us tax increases and tell us we must also do with less, have they thought about those who have always had less -- especially the minorities? This is like telling them that just as they step on the first rung of the ladder of opportunity, the ladder is being pulled out from under them. That may be the Democratic leadership's message to the minorities, but it won't be ours. Our message will be: we have to move ahead, but we're not going to leave anyone behind. Thanks to the economic policies of the Democratic Party, millions of Americans find themselves out of work. Millions more have never even had a fair chance to learn new skills, hold a decent job, or secure for themselves and their families a share in the prosperity of this nation.

It is time to put America back to work; to make our cities and towns resound with the confident voices of men and women of all races, nationalities and faiths bringing home to their families a decent paycheck they can cash for honest money.

For those without skills, we'll find a way to help them get skills.

For those without job opportunities, we'll stimulate new opportunities, particularly in the inner cities where they live.

For those who have abandoned hope, we'll restore hope and we'll welcome them into a great national crusade to make America great again!

When we move from domestic affairs and cast our eyes abroad, we see an equally sorry chapter on the record of the present administration.

- As Soviet combat brigade trains in Cuba, just 90 miles from our shores.

- A Soviet army of invasion occupies Afghanistan, further threatening our vital interests in the Middle East.

- America's defense strength is at its lowest ebb in a generation, while the Soviet Union is vastly outspending us in both strategic and conventional arms.

- Our European allies, looking nervously at the growing menace from the East, turn to us for leadership and fail to find it.

- And, incredibly more than 50 of our fellow Americans have been held captive for over eight months by a dictatorial foreign power that holds us up to ridicule before the world.

Adversaries large and small test our will and seek to confound our resolve, but we are given weakness when we need strength; vacillation when the times demand firmness.

The Carter Administration lives in the world of make-believe. Every day, drawing up a response to that day's problems, troubles, regardless of what happened yesterday and what will happen tomorrow.

The rest of us, however, live in the real world. It is here that disasters are overtaking our nation without any real response from Washington.

This is make-believe, self-deceit and -- above all -- transparent hypocrisy.

For example, Mr. Carter says he supports the volunteer army, but he lets military pay and benefits slip so low that many of our enlisted personnel are actually eligible for food stamps. Re-enlistment rates drop and, just recently, after he fought all week against a proposal to increase the pay of our men and women in uniform, he helicoptered to our carrier, the U.S.S. Nimitz, which was returning from long months of duty. He told the crew that he advocated better pay for them and their comrades! Where does he really stand, now that he's back on shore?

I'll tell you where I stand. I do not favor a peacetime draft or registration, but I do favor pay and benefit levels that will attract and keep highly motivated men and women in our volunteer forces and an active reserve trained and ready for an instant call in case of an emergency.

There may be a sailor at the helm of the ship of state, but the ship has no rudder. Critical decisions are made at times almost in comic fashion, but who can laugh? Who was not embarrassed when the administration handed a major propaganda victory in the United Nations to the enemies of Israel, our staunch Middle East ally for three decades, and them claim that the American vote was a "mistake," the result of a "failure of communication" between the president, his secretary of state, and his U.N. ambassador?

Who does not feel a growing sense of unease as our allies, facing repeated instances of an amateurish and confused administration, reluctantly conclude that America is unwilling or unable to fulfill its obligations as the leader of the free world?

Who does not feel rising alarm when the question in any discussion of foreign policy is no longer, "Should we do something?", but "Do we have the capacity to do anything?"

The administration which has brought us to this state is seeking your endorsement for four more years of weakness, indecision, mediocrity and incompetence. No American should vote until he or she has asked, is the United States stronger and more respected now than it was three-and-a-half years ago? Is the world today a safer place in which to live?

It is the responsibility of the president of the United States, in working for peace, to insure that the safety of our people cannot successfully be threatened by a hostile foreign power. As president, fulfilling that responsibility will be my number one priority.

We are not a warlike people. Quite the opposite. We always seek to live in peace. We resort to force infrequently and with great reluctance--and only after we have determined that it is absolutely necessary. We are awed--and rightly so--by the forces of destruction at loose in the world in this nuclear era. But neither can we be naive or foolish. Four times in my lifetime America has gone to war, bleeding the lives of its young men into the sands of beachheads, the fields of Europe and the jungles and rice paddies of Asia. We know only too well that war comes not when the forces of freedom are strong, but when they are weak. It is then that tyrants are tempted.

We simply cannot learn these lessons the hard way again without risking our destruction.

Of all the objectives we seek, first and foremost is the establishment of lasting world peace. We must always stand ready to negotiate in good faith, ready to pursue any reasonable avenue that holds forth the promise of lessening tensions and furthering the prospects of peace. But let our friends and those who may wish us ill take note: the United States has an obligation to its citizens and to the people of the world never to let those who would destroy freedom dictate the future course of human life on this planet. I would regard my election as proof that we have renewed our resolve to preserve world peace and freedom. This nation will once again be strong enough to do that.

This evening marks the last step--save one--of a campaign that has taken Nancy and me from one end of this great land to the other, over many months and thousands of miles. There are those who question the way we choose a president; who say that our process imposes difficult and exhausting burdens on those who seek the office. I have not found it so.

It is impossible to capture in words the splendor of this vast continent which God has granted as our portion of this creation. There are no words to express the extraordinary strength and character of this breed of people we call Americans.

Everywhere we have met thousands of Democrats, Independents, and Republicans from all economic conditions and walks of life bound together in that community of shared values of family, work, neighborhood, peace and freedom. They are concerned, yes, but they are not frightened. They are disturbed, but not dismayed. They are the kind of men and women Tom Paine had in mind when he wrote--during the darkest days of the American Revolution--"We have it in our power to begin the world over again."

Nearly 150 years after Tom Paine wrote those words, an American president told the generation of the Great Depression that it had a "rendezvous with destiny." I believe that this generation of Americans today has a rendezvous with destiny.

Tonight, let us dedicate ourselves to renewing the American compact. I ask you not simply to "Trust me," but to trust your values--our values--and to hold me responsible for living up to them. I ask you to trust that American spirit which knows no ethnic, religious, social, political, regional, or economic boundaries; the spirit that burned with zeal in the hearts of millions of immigrants from every corner of the Earth who came here in search of freedom.

Some say that spirit no longer exists. But I have seen it -- I have felt it -- all across the land; in the big cities, the small towns and in rural America. The American spirit is still there, ready to blaze into life if you and I are willing to do what has to be done; the practical, down-to-earth things that will stimulate our economy, increase productivity and put America back to work. The time is now to resolve that the basis of a firm and principled foreign policy is one that takes the world as it is and seeks to change it by leadership and example; not by harangue, harassment or wishful thinking.

The time is now to say that while we shall seek new friendships and expand and improve others, we shall not do so by breaking our word or casting aside old friends and allies.

And, the time is now to redeem promises once made to the American people by another candidate, in another time and another place. He said, "For three long years I have been going up and down this country preaching that government--federal, state, and local--costs too much. I shall not stop that preaching. As an immediate program of action, we must abolish useless offices. We must eliminate unnecessary functions of government...we must consolidate subdivisions of government and, like the private citizen, give up luxuries which we can no longer afford."

"I propose to you, my friends, and through you that government of all kinds, big and little be made solvent and that the example be set by the president of the United State and his Cabinet."

So said Franklin Delano Roosevelt in his acceptance speech to the Democratic National Convention in July 1932.

The time is now, my fellow Americans, to recapture our destiny, to take it into our own hands. But, to do this will take many of us, working together. I ask you tonight to volunteer your help in this cause so we can carry our message throughout the land.

Yes, isn't now the time that we, the people, carried out these unkempt promises? Let us pledge to each other and to all America on this July day 48 years later, we intend to do just that.

I have thought of something that is not part of my speech and I'm worried over whether I should do it.

Can we doubt that only a Divine Providence placed this land, this island of freedom, here as a refuge for all those people in the world who yearn to breathe freely: Jews and Christians enduring persecution behind the Iron Curtain, the boat people of Southeast Asia, of Cuba and Haiti, the victims of drought and famine in Africa, the freedom fighters of Afghanistan and our own countrymen held in savage captivity.

I'll confess that I've been a little afraid to suggest what I'm going to suggest -- I'm more afraid not to -- that we begin our crusade joined together in a moment of silent prayer. God bless America

Ronald Reagan - July 17th, 1980


Dan's Chocolates

Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

'Would you given a Harvard graduate a position of CEO right after graduation?' [Guest Post]

A Guest Post By: Laura Schneider

A Response To Clinton's Call For Unity By A Clinton Supporter

Tonight Hillary gave one of the most brilliant speeches yet. Equal to any that her husband has given. Far better and more REAL than anything Obama has ever given. She rises to every occasion. Always has. Always will. She's my girl!

But Hillary can't win this election for Obama. He has to win it by himself for himself. If he is to become the leader of the free world, he must first lead.

It's like a guy who is courting a woman and has all his friends and his family and her family tell her what a wonderful husband he would make and how she should marry him. He sends one emissary after another while sitting and watching events transpire from a safe, comfortable distance, waiting for success to come to him, to be served on the "silver" platter. But he doesn't want to take the time to get up off his ass, go to her, look her in the eye and tell her "this is who I am, this is what I believe, this is what I want in life, and I want to share it with you and have you as a partner by my side. Will you marry me?" Until he is willing to do that, nothing anyone else says matters.

Obama can't close the deal because he doesn't want to look into our eyes and tell us who he is and what he believes in and what he wants for us. He can tell us what he wants for himself. But he can't say what he wants FOR us, that is not on his agenda, what he wants FROM us is -- our vote, because that is his stepping stone to power. But votes have to be earned. You only earn them by humbly asking for them and promising to deliver on an agreed agenda. There is no other way to get our vote.

What is his agenda? His agenda is to obtain power. Ours is to make a better country and a better life for ourselves and our children. There is a difference with a distinction here. And he knows it will show if he tries to fake it. That's why he still can't close the deal.

He is expecting Hillary and Bill and Biden and all his surrogates to win our votes for him, but he must win them for himself. Surrogates can reinforce what is already there or lay the groundwork for what is to come, but Obama must close the deal himself. He must lead.

Hillary gave one of the most brilliant speeches yet. She was presidential. She was committed. She was selfless. And she was leading us, as her followers and supporters, to commit ourselves to our common goals, or what she believes is Obama's common goals with her and us. The problem remains that I'm not convinced yet. I'm not convinced Obama really cares about me and my life. I'm not convinced that Obama wants the same thing for our country that I do. I just can't believe yet, not in him. I really, truly wish I could.

I believe in Hillary. I believe in her motives and her agenda. And I believe that Hillary believes. But I just don't believe in Obama. Not now. Maybe not ever.

The most touching part of the speech came after it was over, when Suzanne Malveaux of CNN interviewed a black woman, a Hillary supporter. She had tears in her eyes. She was fighting not to lose the battle with her emotions and break down. She said all the things all of us Hillary supporters have been feeling. She remarked how Hillary was so presidential. It was so obvious and real. Hillary had experience. Hillary could have made all of our dreams happen. Hillary could have made all of our dreams happen. But she said several times emphatically that she would not vote for McCain. She also added: "Would you given a Harvard graduate a position of CEO right after graduation? No" When Malveaux asked her several times during the interview if she would vote for Obama, she could not say yes....

And I was saying to myself, "That woman's right. She's absolutely right."

What else could I say? What else can I say?

Click Here To Read More By Laura Schneider At Her Weblog



Batman Costumes w Free Shipping

Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Clinton's Primary Remarks, Not A Convention Speech, Will Be The Gift That Keeps On Giving!

The media seemed somewhat relieved last night that Hillary Clinton's speech called for unity around Barack Obama. But did the media really expect anything less?? Realistically, it would have been political suicide to Clinton to deliver any speech that did not call for unity within the party. The Clintons are truly stuck in limbo, if they were to unequivocally support an Obama nomination and he were elected then she would have an uphill battle in 4 years to gain the nomination. Yet, if they lash against Obama and are perceived as being the cause of his November loss, then the far-left power brokers will further abandon them and they will be left in independent limbo.

The media, for the most part, was quick in immediately painting Clinton's speech as a move toward healing the divisions within the party and her support for Obama. But the media paid little attention to the fact that the powerful message of her speech only galvanized her supporters belief that she, not Obama, should have been the nominee. In the minutes following Clinton's speech, CNN which openly applauded and was relieved by her speech made the decision to interview some of Clinton's supporters on the floor. In the interview of an AA Clinton delegate, you could see the visible shock by CNN reporters when she stated that this speech only proved that Clinton should be the nominee; she reiterated that Obama was not experienced enough to be POTUS; that she would not vote for McCain; but for the first time in her life she would most likely not vote at all. CNN, of course, attempted to cut the interview short and made sure not to interview any more Clinton Delegates.

Clinton's speech for was well written and very, well delivered; yet, the first three quarters of the speech appeared as more of a Clinton Campaign speech than a glowing endorsement of Obama. The end of her speech, which was directly aimed to please the Obama campaign and DNC leadership did launch an attack upon McCain. But for the most part they were attacks that were so outrageous that they would only appeal to Obama's far-left supporters and would be overlooked by moderate Democrats. At the end of her speech, Clinton attacked McCain by stating, "More skyrocketing debt ...home foreclosures ...and mounting bills that are crushing our middle class families. More war . . . less diplomacy. More of a government where the privileged come first ...and everyone else comes last. John McCain says the economy is fundamentally sound. John McCain doesn't think that 47 million people without health insurance is a crisis. John McCain wants to privatize Social Security. And in 2008, he still thinks it's okay when women don't earn equal pay for equal work."

Hillary knows that moderate Democrats will not fall for such arguments. They understand that John McCain, who has experienced the worst atrocities of war first hand, would never rush to take this country into war. The Clintons know that their supporters understand that the women's pay issue carries little weight when the Obama campaign pays female campaign workers less than their counterparts. The Clinton's know that their supporters already recognize the fallacy of the "McSame" argument, as it is the argument that Obama supporters have made for months.

Hillary's speech was impressive, and her lengthy focus on the Women's movement was not a call for unity, it was a call for the female base of her support to never give up their fight. Clinton's female supporters, whom only represent a portion of the Clinton base that is not falling in line, will never take her speech as a call for unity and will only cement their belief that their fight is the right one.

The words of Clinton in Denver were powerful, but temporary. You will not see commercial after commercial stemming from the Obama campaign of excerpts of her speech. If Obama felt that Clinton's words carried that much weight he would have put her on the ticket. Instead, it is Hillary's speeches, attacks on Obama, and praise for McCain that will become the gift that keeps on giving. The McCain campaign has hours of tape and dozens upon dozens of comments by Clinton all ripe to be converted into commercials. In the end, it will be her own words in the primaries, words which were driven by and expressed her genuine feelings, not a politically necessary speech in Denver, that will be remembered by the general electorate.

J Brown
August 27th, 2008


Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Obama's Appeal: Not Even His Own Delegates Understand His Positions!

For the past two weeks we have listened to Obama surrogates and pundits tell us that this convention would highlight party unity and introduce Barack Obama to the millions of Americans who still don't know 'who he is'. Yet, after 17 months of campaigning and hours of free press from the 'in the tank' MSMs, I highly doubt this love-fest will accomplish this grand introduction.

Obama's problem isn't that no one understands him; his problem is that his own supporters don't understand him and those who do understand his policies and beliefs oppose him. DNC Leadership has anointed a candidate who they felt would have little baggage in the general election, but apparently they failed to vet this product of the Chicago Political Machine. Now they have a well-spoken candidate who will say anything, do anything, change any 'stated' position, deny every association, inject race, inject age, divide the electorate based upon social issues and take any other step he can take to get a vote. The problem for Obama though, is that he cannot tell America his true positions, because if he did, he would overwhelmingly lose. As a result, we have a candidate whom no one including his own supporters understand what his positions are.

I would like to introduce you to 18 year old, Ben Traber, a DNC Delegate, Obama Supporter, and "Precinct Captain" for the Obama campaign. Traber represents the youngest of the DNC Delegates, the individuals who are responsible for choosing their parties' nominee. As a result, you would expect a well-educated and informed individual capable of understanding the positions of the candidates and wishes of those in the community where he resides. Traber also represents the so-called "youth vote" which has over-whelmingly supported Obama.

In an interview with Fox News yesterday, Traber, a campaign worker and self-proclaimed "life-long Democrat" (so he has voted in how many elections?), from Colorado provided his reasons for supporting Barack Obama. In the interview he stated his reasons for supporting Obama, "he represents a new face in Washington DC, I know that really appeals to young voters like me. Also, I like on foreign policy how he is willing to speak to leaders of other countries that we might not like, with no preconditions and things of that nature..."

I will agree with young Traber that Obama would 'represent a new face in Washington DC', especially considering that he has been largely absent during the 4 years since his election to the Senate. However, Traber is a delegate to the convention, elected by DNC members to represent the broader Democratic Base. These are supposed to be the individuals who best understand the positions of the candidates, yet clearly Traber has no idea that the Obama campaign has flipped, flopped, and ran away from the 'no preconditions' statements nearly 2 months ago. Is this the best that an Obama supporting delegate to the DNC can come up with?

Are these the voters that Obama is appealing to? Those who have no political knowledge, no understanding of the foreign policy and conflictual history of this nation?

Perhaps the Obama campaign should consider introducing his policies to the members of his own party before he attempts to re-introduce himself, for the umpteenth time in 17 months, to the American people.

J Brown
August 26th, 2008


Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Emil Jones To Clinton Supporter & Delegate: You're 'Uncle Tom'

There has been little discussion during this campaign of Obama surrogate and his admitted mentor Emil Jones. Jones is currently the Illinois Senate Majority Leader and responsible for first pushing Obama to run for office and then the US Senate. As Senate Majority Leader, Jones has proven to be one of the most divisive figures in Illinois Politics as a right-hand man of the unpopular Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich. In recent weeks, while facing a backlash from his own party, Jones announced that he was retiring from politics; a move that well-received by the public who overwhelmingly did not approve of his tactics or job performance.

Late Saturday night in a hotel lobby at the Democratic National Convention, Jones allegedly turned on a Black Hillary Clinton Supporter when he verbally attacked her, referring to her as an 'Uncle Tom'. The move by Jones drew immediate condemnation from the National Organization for Women who called upon Jones to immediately resign.

Jones' comments underscore two problems that exists within the Democratic Party. First, despite Party leaderships attempts to call for Unity, a long-standing contempt still exists between factions of the Obama and Clinton camps. Secondly, the comment and subsequent condemnations of Jones highlights the blatant injection of race that has stemmed from the Obama campaign and his surrogates throughout this race.

Hillary Clinton supporters have long complained, a rightfully so, of the constant bombardment of statements and accusations by Obama supporters who charge them as being racists for their criticism of Obama. The occurrence of Jones once again using racially-based rhetoric in attacking an AA woman, Delmarie Cobb, for her support of Clinton only stands to remind Clinton supporters of the questionable and hate-filled attacks upon them during the primaries.

According to an interview with fox news:

"I walked away and said good night and walked over across the hall to the elevators,” she recalled. “And he shouted across the lobby, ‘Uncle Tom!’

“And I came back over and said, ‘Excuse me, what did you just say?’ And he grabbed me by my arms and started laughing. And I said, ‘No, no. What did you just say?’ And he didn’t repeat it. And I said, ‘Did you call me an Uncle Tom?’ And then I came back with a barrage of things that I won’t repeat publicly.”

Jones denied calling Cobb an “Uncle Tom” and refused to elaborate. However, he is now telling reporters that he called her a “doubting Thomas” and that Cobb must have misheard the remark.

“She was spouting things about Barack,” Jones said. “What I said was, ‘Come on board, he’s a nice, clean cut guy and everything.’ I said, ‘We’ve got to stop all this. We’ve got too many doubting Thomases and we’ve got to get together.’


For Obama supporters who still believe that Obama is the great unifier who will bring our nation together, just look at what he has done within your own political party. I would hardly call the alienation of 1/2 of Hillary Clinton supporters a profound move towards unity.

J Brown
August 26th, 2008


Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Monday, August 25, 2008

DNC Delegate For McCain Ad Hits The Airwaves! A Stroke Of Genius!

Back on June 16th we wrote an article in which we introduced our readers to Debra Bartoshevich, a Wisconsin DNC Delegate who opposed Obama's nomination and was under fire from her own party for her criticism of Obama. Why is this important? Just read a little further.

In the past few weeks the media has speculated as to how John McCain could possibly draw attention away from the Democratic Convention and maintain a presence in the headlines. Perhaps by a stroke a genius, the McCain campaign made the decision to shock pundits and Obama surrogates by not drawing attention to himself, but rather by highlighting Democratic Leadership that has blatantly ignored a large portion of their base and alienated over 50% of Hillary Clinton's supporters.

Despite the best efforts of Obama Surrogates, polling numbers have continued to show that nearly 1/4 of Clinton's supporters intend on voting for McCain in the fall and that another 25% remain undecided. As a result, the McCain campaign has chosen to feed off of this lack of unity and dissent by running ads using Clinton and even Biden's own attacks on Obama. But today's release of an ad featuring "Debra" will perhaps prove to be the most damaging to the DNC's Unity Fest. You can view the McCain as below.

Excerpt From PDOP Article: No Room For Dissent In Democratic Party - published June 16th.

Wisconsin Delegate Stripped Of Status For Not Supporting Obama!

For the past year on the campaign trail we have heard speech after speech from Senator Obama calling for a change in Washington politics and claiming that he can end the polarization in Washington. However, less than 2 weeks after becoming the presumptive nominee the message from the Democratic leadership is clear: You are either with us or against us.

Reports surfaced late last week that Debra Bartoshevich, a Wisconsin Delegate supporting Hillary Clinton, had told the Journal Sentinel that she would vote for Clinton at the convention and John McCain in November. Bartoshevich’s sister, who had served in Iraq, encouraged Bartoshevich to sign up for “Citizens For McCain”, which prompted her public announcement. Bartoshevich said, “I just feel you need to have somebody who has experience with foreign matters”.The actions of Bartoshevich have embarrassed the Obama Campaign and DNC who have claimed to have been working to earn back the vote of Clinton supporters.

However, the Wisconsin Democratic Party immediately invoked a DNC rule requiring delegate’s to support the nominee and voted for a resolution to prevent the DNC from seating Bartoshevich at the Democratic Convention. The head of the Wisconsin Democratic Party remarked, “It’s extremely important that we send a message that Democrats in the state of Wisconsin will never support somebody who supports John McCain for president”According to the Wisconsin Journal Times [Since Friday’s announcement, Bartoshevich said she has been inundated with e-mails and phone calls from the national press, from other delegates and from people who have expressed their support. She said she hoped this year’s tight race makes the party re-examine its selection process.“I just think the Democratic process for selecting a nominee is flawed,” Bartoshevich said. “I don’t think anybody in the Democratic Party believed that it would be this close.”]
McCain Camapaign's Newest Ad


J Brown
August 25th, 2008


Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Bush's Unfortunate August Failure On Drilling!

Throughout July it had become apparent that energy would become a dominant issue in the upcoming election. With prices at the pump topping $4 a gallon and inflation showing a surge, Americans demanded action and instead got nothing. In mid-July the President did respond to public outcry by lifting the long-standing Executive Moratorium on offshore drilling. The results of his action followed by a Federal Reserve warning the next day caused oil prices to drop by over 10% in the following days. Prior to the President's lifting of the moratorium Oil prices were on a steady rise, but since the President lifted the moratorium oil prices had dropped for 4 straight weeks.

I am positive that the President's actions in July had 2 purposes: To put additional pressure on Congress to actually accomplish something and to demonstrate to the public how a small action, accompanied by the threat of real action will cause oil futures to fall. Bush's lifting of the moratorium in July had a positive effect and was a positive move for his administration. Yet, August would represent a failure of President Bush to maintain pressure upon congress and help demonstrate the failure of congressional leadership.

For the past 2 months I have attacked Congressional leaders for their utter failure in nearly every policy category during the past two years. This 'do nothing' congress who will criticize the Iraqi Parliament for going on vacation while failing to accomplish the work of their own people has taken the same action here in the US. But today it is President Bush's turn. Bush had a golden opportunity at the beginning of August to publicize this nation's energy problems and highlight the failures of Congress. As House Republicans revolted on the floor of Congress, Nancy Pelosi travelled the nation in her quest to sell 5,000 books. The President had the constitutional power to recall Congress for a special session to address energy legislation, but the President failed to act.

There were many, primarily Conservatives, who felt that the President should not recall congress so that energy would remain an issue into the fall election. Yet, the fact is that should Bush have recalled Congress, the session would have been short and Pelosi and Reid would have used parliamentary procedures to block Republican legislation and resume their vacation. Nothing would have been accomplished, yet it would have kept the Energy debate at the forefront of this election. By not pressuring Congress, Energy debate has essentially disappeared from the news cycle. It is true that Russia's Invasion of Georgia is partially responsible, but even those events have faded from the MSM. Instead the Presidential debate has turned back to economic and social issues brought forward by Saddleback.

There were also many who opposed a recall by the President due to the fact that he would be able to make temporary judicial appointments while congress was on recess. Those judicial appointments, most of which have been stonewalled for years by our current Congressional leaders would be able to freely serve until the beginning of the next Congressional term. Yet, for the second year in a row, Senator Reid had a local Democrat arrive in the Senate every three days to open the Senate and immediately hammer the gavel to end debate. The result is that the Senate has never officially adjourned, thus blocking any "recess appointments" by the President.

With those two arguments gone, the President should have recalled Congress and exposed the true obstructionist nature of our Congressional Leaders once again. Instead, he did nothing, the Energy debate has taken second stage, and even last week as inflation dramatically jumped once again due to oil prices the main-stream media ignored the story. The media has somewhat successfully portrayed the high prices of oil as a "bubble" within the markets, yet the fundamentals of the energy markets have not changed. There has been no increase in supply and no long term shift in global demands. This coming month, Chinese consumption which was strictly limited prior too and during the Olympic games will drastically increase as manufacturing and travel revs back up. In the US, oil supplies are still threatened by the Hurricane season and as temperatures cool, refining abilities will come under pressure as refiners make the switch over to fall and winter blends.

Bush had the opportunity to expose the ridiculous obstructionism of congressional leaders and he failed. The Russian invasion and continued occupation of Georgia, which has threatened the oil supply to much of Europe, gave the administration the opportunity to highlight the danger in Obama, Pelosi, and Reid's call to tap the Strategic Oil Reserves, yet he also failed to make the case. With the start of the conventions it is too late for the President to take action, as a recall now would portrayed in the media as purely political.

Bush made the right moves in July, but utterly failed in his follow-thru. The Republicans including McCain must find a way to bring Energy back to the fore-front and not allow Congressional leaders or Obama to turn this election into a debate on Social issues. It is unfortunate that the Bush administration which was given a political gift at the end of July chose to take a non-confrontational, status-quo path in which pressure upon Obama and Congressional Leadership was let up. The Democratic Leadership has one goal on oil, to stall the issue to a point that the public begins to take a defeatist attitude that there is nothing we can do about prices thus becoming complacent in our calls for effective 'do it all' energy policy.

J Brown
August 25th, 2008

Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Sunday, August 24, 2008

Energy: Debunking The Unity Call That Obama & Clinton Were The Same!

Ironically, there appears to be one issue that both the far-right and far-left can agree upon this election. Both agree that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama's policy were essentially the same, and neither can understand why it is the Clinton supporters refuse to back Obama. As a result, Clinton supporters have continued to have to deal with repeated attacks calling them racist or "Republican" Operatives, often times followed by pleas to unite. It's quite a mixture of reaction to their refusal to support Obama. But why is that they would consider supporting McCain, just to stop Obama and the DNC, if Clinton and Obama's policy's were essentially the same? Perhaps because they weren't!

The Clinton Democrats' fight has gone far beyond the fight for just a candidate, it is a fight to reform an entire political party and end the far-left hijacking of the party. Over half of Clinton supporters have failed to follow Obama into the general election, perhaps making them the largest swing-vote in this election. But there is no doubt that this week they will continue to face a massive media attempt and marketing campaign aimed at unity, and it is time that the most vocal of the Puma Community raise their voice to show the dangers of an Obama presidency.

The single biggest reason that Clinton lost the nomination stemmed not from failures of her campaign strategists at the beginning of the year but rather from events that took place following her first Senatorial victory. For three years following her initial election, there was no doubt in any pundits mind that Clinton would some day run for the presidency. As a result, during the first years of her Senatorial career the media was quick to highlight her move toward the center. It was a move that was pointed out by the Main Stream Media and even Conservative controlled air waves. I remember Rush Limbaugh pointing out on almost a daily basis her move toward the center. This move turned the Soros, Dean, Pelosi and Reid ideologues against her out of fear by these far-left power brokers of another Clinton Presidency that would be willing to work with both sides of the isle. As a result she lost their support and they found their own candidate. Now you can call Clinton's move to the center in her early Senatorial career a move based upon political expedience or a move based upon a broader understanding that you must be willing to work with the other side; regardless, it was her own attempts to moderate her positions that started to stack the cards against her.

But were her and Obama's policies really the same? As an independent conservative, I would argue no. On the surface, they may support similar basic principles, but you must look below the surface to realize just how radical Obama's policies are.

Take for instance the issue of Energy and the Windfall Profit's Tax. All candidates preach the need for increased alternative energies, but both Clinton and Obama want to roll back certain Energy-related tax-breaks and institute a Windfall Profits Tax. So they are essentially the same, right?? Wrong! We will never know what Clinton's position would have been on drilling, but we do know the differences that existed in their energy plans.

Clinton had put together an energy plan that called for the creation of a 10 year -$50 billion 'Strategic Energy Fund'. The fund would be paid for by a roll-back of oil-company tax-breaks (which of course Obama voted for and McCain didn't) along with the imposition of a Windfall Profits Tax. Now if you are reader of PDOP, you understand how much I absolutely despise the thought of a WPT, yet that is not the issue today. Clinton's plan would be paid for by rolling back $30 billion of tax breaks over a ten-year period, and her Windfall Profits Tax would raise $20 billion over a ten year period. At the time of the primaries this sounded like a large amount, but today it pales in comparison to Obama's suggestions.

Obama's energy plan calls for a $500 immediate energy rebate costing (by his own figures) $75 billion dollars, plus a ten-year, $150 billion, investment into alternative energies. He would pay for the plan through a roll back of $30 billion in tax breaks over ten years, along with the imposition of a $15 billion PER YEAR Windfall Profits Tax. Uh-Oh...Now are you starting to see the difference? Clinton - $20 billion over ten years, Obama $150 billion over ten years! Ironically, Obama's $225 Billion plan still comes up short on the funding, but alas I will let you in on a little secret he doesn't want you to know.

Obama and his adviser's have consistently estimated that their WPT would raise $15 billion per year. That estimate was never based upon any hard numbers it was based upon their rhetoric that a tax equal to 10% of the oil company's $150 billion in profits would be reasonable. Yet, when you look at how Obama is suggesting we implement the tax, he has called for a 20%-25% tax on per barrel prices above $80 per barrel. Considering that this tax would be imposed on the $20 million barrels per day our country burns through, the tax at $120 per barrel would actually raise (theoretically, in nonsensical & no understanding of free markets world) $58-$70 billion per year. At $100 per barrel the tax would raise $26-$35 billion per year.

So what's the real difference: A Clinton WPT equal to roughly 1.25% of oil profits over 10 years, or an Obama WPT equal to 20%-40% of oil company profits over ten years.

I'm no fan of any WPT, but even I have to admit that Clinton's energy plan was much more realistic, moderate and designed to raise revenue without destroying an entire industry when compared to the Obama plan. This is what Americans don't understand and will never be told by the Main Stream Media. I may never agree with many of Hillary Clinton's policies, but her left-leaning policies pale in comparison to the outright socialist proposals of Obama.

J Brown
August 24th, 2008
Let SimpleTuition help make the hardest choice the easiest
Click here to find the right student loan for you!
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Saturday, August 23, 2008

Obama's Springfield Speech Piggybacks On Blues Festival, Governor Not Invited

On Saturday afternoon, Senator Obama will return to the capital of Illinois to give his first speech since announcing the 36 year congressional veteran, Joe Biden as his running mate. Being from the capital city, I can tell you that I was a little bit shocked to learn that Senator was re-visiting the hometown of one of the greatest Republican Presidents. Why?

The Democratic brand name in central Illinois is heavily damaged. The area is traditionally Republican leaning, but for a brief time in the years following the indictment of a Republican governor shifted to the Democratic Party. But things have changed in the past few years as a Chicago-Ran Illionois government has led Illinois into deeper budget deficits, , raised fees on nearly every business in Illinois, driven medical professionals out of the State, and mire in corruption. No area has been hit harder than the capital city in which nearly 50,000 local residents work for state agencies.

2 Weeks ago, during Democrat Day at the Illinois State Fair, the highly unpopular Governor Rod Blagojevich had to bus down supportive state employees from the Chicago area so that he would have a friendly crowd during the festivities. The employees were given the day off and of course a free ride. But the Governor was shocked when during a speech he was met not with a friendly crowd, but rather a large crowd led by Unionized State Employees who boo-ed him off stage and protested his presence. The primary platform of Blago was his promise of health care to all Illinois Citizens, but even as he dramatically expanded health care benefits in Illinois, this year he cut back on Healthcare benefits to his own State Employees to pay for the program. Ironic Isn't It?

Blagojevich, who is not only heavily involved in the Rezko corruption, is currently involved in no fewer than 4 different State and Federal corruption investigations. Illinois Residents fully expect Blago to face indictment following the end of his current term, and with the retirement of Emil Jones, it is likely that he will face impeachment sometime after the November Elections. Ironically, despite his close friendship with Obama, Blago announced on Thursday that he will not be in attendance of Obama's speech in Springfield on Saturday for obvious reasons.

Obama's speech on Saturday is expected to draw a smaller crowd than the 5,000-7,000 that he drew when he announced his candidacy in Jan. 2007. The Obama campaign expects a crowd of around 2,000. What the main stream media will fail to report about this crowd, is the Blues and Backyard Barbecue event that his happening on the adjacent corner of the Old State Capital. The event in it's fifth year will run from noon in the late night and is expected to draw in around 2,000-4,000 attendees. Ironically, Obama's speech which was originally scheduled to occur at noon has been pushed back to 3PM, during the height of the Blues festival taking place just a few yards away.

In addition, reports have also surface that Obama campaign is busing several hundred supporters from upstate Illinois and the Metro-East area of St. Louis to boost the attendance of his Springfield speech. Even in his own backyard, the Senator has to work just to maintain appearance. As for myself, I will happily be on the opposite side of town enjoying a day with children and wife.

J Brown
August 23rd, 2008
Let SimpleTuition help make the hardest choice the easiest
Click here to find the right student loan for you!
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Friday, August 22, 2008

Huffpo Helping McCain By Still Slamming Clinton & Supporters!

You would think that with the Demockocratic leadership and media doing everthing in their power to push the unity pony, Huffpo would be working to re-unite those bitter and clingy Clinton supporters with the party. Yet Huffpo, which is clearly more interested in pushing the fringe-left agenda of Obama, Pelosi and Reid has decided to continue their onslaught of attacks aimed at Clinton and her supporters.

We have seen this behavior from the fring-left before, they claim to love freedom of speech and democracy yet will turn on anyone with the audacity to question their positions. It happened to Joe Leibermann when he refused to fall in line with the defeatist attitudes of the party and now it is clear that Clinton, and moreover, her supporters will be the next victims. It's interesting though, that fringe-left media would continue to attack Clinton supporters, especially considering that the leadership of the party has a history of doing whatever is necessary to obtain power. Perhaps blinded by their own hatred for those who question fundamental Obama-ism, they have yet to realize that Clinton supporters are a swing demographic in this election.


In recent days, even CNN and MSNBC have had to admit that Clinton supporters show no sign of falling in line behind Obama; and why should they? After all, the lengthy and divisive Democratic Primaries gave them a first hand education into Obama. The media and Democratic leadership continue to buy into the notion that Clinton supporters will eventually fall into line, yet polling consistently shows that 20% of Clinton's backers will vote for McCain and another 25% remain undecided (there decision will be easy once Clinton is denied the VP). Simply put that means that over 3.5 million Clinton supporters will cast a vote for McCain and perhaps as many as 4.5 million more will back McCain after Obama announces his VP choice. Statistically, it doesn't make sense for Huffpo and other fringe sites to continue to attack Clinton and her supporters. However, speaking for myself, I welcome their attacks because their hatred will only help John McCain.

So as my reminder to Clinton supporters, here is what the fringe-left as published by Huffpo, think of you...
" the Democratic nominating contest is a race for delegates, not votes; leaving aside, too, the fact that the very idea of "the popular vote" is meaningless in a contest comprised of both primaries and caucuses, some open and some closed; leaving aside all of that, the only way Hillary actually still could "have" 18 million votes is if it were a static electorate --- which it's not...

some of those who voted for her in the earlier contests had switched their loyalties by the end of the primary...Hillary Clinton ran for President and got a lot of votes in the process. But does that mean that Hillary is the only political woman who can, as she likes to say, "break the highest and hardest glass ceiling"...

there is something reductive, elitist, anti-democratic, astonishingly arrogant, and downright anti-feminist in the assumption that Hillary Clinton embodies every political asset Barack Obama can and should want in a VP, woman or otherwise...

the self-censoring, self-negating, and, ultimately, self-sabotaging no-woman-but-Hillary-impulse betrays a complete failure to understand who Barack Obama is, and a complete absence of curiosity and imagination about who has what he really needs to help move the party forward...

But the biggest reason that Hillary should not be Obama's VP has to do with...(Hillary) branding him as "irresponsible and, frankly, naïve" on matters of foreign policy and national security...

Obama is the one whose judgment on the Iraq war has turned out to be right...

(Hillary) was the one who not only caved to George Bush on Iraq but who still cannot bring herself to express any unqualified remorse about her vote...

Obama, far from being a naïve idealist on foreign policy, is a next-generation realist...

unlike Hillary Clinton, neither Joe Biden nor Bill Richardson betrayed Democrats by telling the country at large that Barack Obama is "irresponsible" and "naïve" --- that he is, in effect, unpresidential.

You can read the full BS article by clicking here.
Huffpo, the Demockocratic leadership and the msm's still believe that Clinton supporters will forget all that has been said and all that has happened, and eventually fall-in-line with the Obama campaign. But perhaps, just perhaps, these groups should consider the reality that Clinton supporters who haven't fallen in line, have done so because they recognize the danger of an Obama presidency and don't support the socialized policies of the fringe-left.

J Brown
August 22nd, 2008
Let SimpleTuition help make the hardest choice the easiest
Click here to find the right student loan for you!
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

'They'll Try To Scare You': Inside The Fringe Left's View Of America!

There our many of us who take the time to understand our heritage, who are proud of this country and who refuse to buy into the notion's that America is to blame for all the world's woes and that the government is best suited to solve our individual problems; and then...there are those others. On the campaign trail Senator Obama will tell Americans that individuals like myself and my readers will try to scare them into voting for John McCain. Obama preaches undefined hope and change, but the best gauge of Obama's view of this nation can best be found in the propaganda of his surrogates. It is the fringe-left of the Democratic party that has tried to scare voters into action and no article I have ever read could summarize the fringe-left's view of the world more than the one I read this morning.

In an article entitled 'Obama's Tragic Campaign: Our Last Chance', author Jeff Madrick gave the best summation of his and the Obama fringe-left's view of this nation. In the article, Madrick wrote:

' Barack Obama's campaign is tragically modest.'
Interesting because 'modest' and Obama are two words I never pictured in the same sentence.
'That is how Clinton formed his policies. Even if times are bad and we are neglecting our assets, only tell the voters what they want to hear'
Fringe-Left had to throw in a jab Bill Clinton, a year ago this would have seemed surprising.
'America is in far deeper trouble than Obama or his advisers dare to think.'
Really? Because the picture Obama paints is pretty bleak in and of itself. Things must be really bad.
'Wages have been crummy in America since the 1970s.'
No good times here!
'Educational quality is highly unequal. There is no serious nationwide pre-k program in a world in which other nations have or will have one. '
Hmm...So much for competition, perhaps we should lower standards further to create an equal playing field.
'Transportation and healthcare are stunningly inefficient. Respected observers say the nation has to spend $200 billion a year to repair and get transportation up to speed. We spend so much on inefficient healthcare, it leaves little or nothing for other requirements...It will get worse. '

Wow... Transportation has problems because of State Government's who do not recognize the needs to prioritize services. As far as health care, yes there could be changes to our health care system, beginning with tort reform; but if the system is so flawed, why do millions travel to the US instead of France to retrieve treatment?

'Then there is energy. It is not time for compromise on offshore drilling. We need big programs.'
Let's all buy bicycles and buggy's (wait... nix the buggy's the horses crap gives off methane).
'What are Obama's people talking about instead? Modest tax cuts for the middle class! Right out of the Third Way playbook. '

Modest Tax Cuts that are misleading and would never occur in light of congress' $400 billion deficit and Obama's $863 billion in new proposed spending.
'Americans will put up a little more tax money to solve its serious problems if they are asked. They are willing to share in the pain. If they understand such tax money will be spent to make them better off, relieve their concerns, save their future. '
Please sir, may I have another? Yes, the 35% of my family's self-employed income that we funnel to the government is not enough. If only they took 60% then I could qualify for food stamps and all would be good.
'Now is the time to be bold ...The problems are too deep and wide. It is not a mere conversation. It is a battle for the truth and the future. It may be our last chance.'
For Mr.Madrick: God I hope it's your last chance, but I'm sure that it won't be. Mr. Obama's $863 Billion in proposed government spending and 23% growth in the size of our government is more than enough. In fact, it is beyond expansion and can be considered nothing more than an outright shift to socialism.

This is the mindset of the leadership that controls the Democratic Party today, these are not people who see any shred of good in the fabric of this nation. They do not see the shining city upon the hill and that is why they have never been proud of this nation. They do not understand and will never appreciate the sacrifices and heritage of those before us that built this nation. In the minds of Mr. Madrick, Obama, Pelosi and Reid this nation is a cesspool of poverty, with a health care system reminiscent of the age of the plague, a transportation system in shambles, workers barely making it by on $1 per month (sorry wrong nation, heh Obama), and a nation built upon greed and evil. To them, only the wisdom of government and only bureaucracy can solve our problems. To them we are hopeless and destined to destroy ourselves.

This nation faces challenges and it always will, but I assure you that big government is not the solution to our problems. There is a reason why the US remains the economic backbone of the world, there is a reason why hundreds of thousands flock to our nation for higher education, there is a reason why tens of thousands from Europe, Canada and other nations flock to our medical facilities. When we stared down the depression in the 1930's it was not big government that saved our nation. When Roosevelt took office the unemployment rate was a staggering 23%; at the time of his re-inauguration in 1937, unemployment remained at 19%. Even Roosevelt understood that his expansion of government was not designed to solve America's economic and social woes, he admitted that his policies were designed to provide a safety net, not a lifeline. Today, we have handed the reigns of government to the fringe-left, individuals who abuse populism in order to garner power; individuals who feed off the challenges we face and will scare you into believing only they can solve them. It was not our government that made this greatest nation on God's Green Earth, it was its citizens who were given the opportunity, without an interfering government, to choose their own path to success.

Geesh... The McCain campaign will never have to scare me into casting a vote against Obama, surrogates such as Huffpo have done more than enough. If you want some interesting reading google Hugo Chavez, or Hitler, or Mussolini, or Lenin and compare their early political rhetoric to that of the candidates; then google JFK, or FDR, Teddy Roosevelt, Reagan, or Truman and do the same. Then tell me which candidate more closely resembles those greatest leaders of our past.


J Brown
August 21st, 2008
Let SimpleTuition help make the hardest choice the easiest
Click here to find the right student loan for you!
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Thursday, August 21, 2008

Obama & DNC Finalize Plans for the Largest Political Fundraising Event in History

There is no doubt that on the morning following Barack Obama’s likely acceptance speech in Denver we will all wake up to headlines heralding the vast crowd and historical significance of Obama’s acceptance speech. News organizations around the world will not only taut Obama as the first African-American major party presidential nominee but will also highlight the scope of the crowd that will be present at Invesco Field. But beyond the obvious propaganda of holding the event at Invesco is the behind the scenes and more questionable reasons for the event.

Much ado has been made about the $4 - $5 million price tag of the event, with little attention being paid to the “Why? After all, why would a campaign be willing to blow $5 million during a hotly contested presidential campaign, when that money might be better invested in a state such as Ohio? Let’s face it, no one or campaign invests that sum of money without a reasonable assurance of a return on their investment. Forget about the feel good headlines of the day following Obama’s acceptance speech, the real story will rest in the headlines in the week following the event:

‘Obama Raises $10 Million…” “Obama Raises $25 million…” “Obama Raises $50 million on Night of Acceptance Speech!” “Obama Campaign Shatters All Fundraising Records”??????

Do you think it’s laughable or unrealistic? If so, you’re right; it’s not laughable, it’s scary! Go back 2 months ago to June 20th when Senator Obama announced he was withdrawing from his pledged commitment to public financing. Although many criticized his flop, others wondered if it would prove to be a mistake should fundraising dry up. Yet, just 8 days later the Obama campaign would leak information and create the rumor that Obama was planning to change the venue of the acceptance speech to Invesco. Less than 10 days later, Obama would officially announce the move. The proximity of these two events would easily suggest that they were related. Obama could not withdraw from public financing unless he was fully confident that he could rapidly offset the $84.5 million of public funds that he would turn down and match the additional contributions that John McCain is likely to raise for the RNC during September and October. The fact that the Invesco rumors began flying just days after his announcement would imply that this move had long been considered.

Behind the scenes of Invesco and the Democratic Convention is an army of 10,000 volunteers and paid workers. On the night that Obama’s Invesco speech is given, a large number of these volunteers will be working from phone banks, special facilities set-up for bloggers, and from locations responsible for a massive email and text messaging initiative that will contact tens-of-thousands of Obama supporters to capitalize on the night’s propaganda driven excitement. Invesco field and its crown will be transformed into the largest political phone bank in history.

In an underreported Associated Press story at the end of July, the Obama campaign released information detailing it’s plans to utilize the 60,000 Obama supporters in attendance to create the largest phone bank in history. According to the campaign, in the hours prior to Obama’s speech, campaign workers and aids will be on stage encouraging the crowd to use their cell phones to text message friends and family to garner support for the Senator. In addition, aids will be among the crowd distributing “micro-targeted” call sheets and scripts for supporters to use their cell phones to contact Obama supporters or unregistered voters to encourage their support. According to one campaign official, Steve Hildebrand, "There will be a lot of idle time. We put idle people to work."

Beyond the phone banks and online efforts of the DNC and Obama campaign is the obvious on-site fundraising that will occur. Computer banks and on-site fundraising booths are likely to be positioned throughout the Invesco complex making it easy for the 60,000-70,000 supporters to contribute to the campaign.

During the primaries the Obama campaign consistently raised $4-$5 million in the hours following Obama’s victory or concession speeches. With the additional volunteers, staffing, data-mining techniques and 2 months of contact planning it is reasonable to assume that the Obama campaign will raise well over $10 million from their phone and internet efforts on the night of his acceptance speech. The largest impact, however will come from the 60,000-65,000 rabid Obama supporters who are ready to open their pocketbooks before and after his speech. If each of these supporters contributed just $10 on election night it would raise over $600,000 for the campaign. A $100 average contribution would net over $6 million, and the numbers only go up from there.

It is true that many supporters in the audience that night will have already contributed the maximum amount to the campaign, but at the same time many will be well under the limit. It is also important to understand that the Obama campaigns stance on tracking contributions is to accept the contribution and then handle the due dilligence in regards to the contribution. At the same time it’s important to remember that the contribution limit to the DNC is well over $25,000 per person.

Considering the logistical nightmare of handling such a large crowd, the question that should be asked is how the Obama campaign and DNC will assure that no mischief takes place among these contributors. I would also wonder what steps the FEC has taken or required of the campaign to make sure as to the identities and sources of funds for these contributions.

Considering that Obama is a bi-product of a Chicago political machine that convinces 20,000-30,000 deceased voters to cast a ballot every election, who is to say that such behavior will not occur in an environment ripe for fraud. I for one can imagine Soros handing out checks with the payee line left blank for supporters to deposit and then re-contribute the funds to the DNC or Obama campaign.

Whether by willful ignorance or just a refusal to question the reasons behind Invesco, the media has utterly failed on this issue. Blinded by their own self-proclaimed love affair with Obama, the media has commercialized the event while ignoring stories such as the AP’ s phone bank story. Ultimately, there is an enormous marketing benefit for Obama to give his speech in front of such a large crowd; however, that temporary benefit is outmatched by the real reason for the move: Money. The Invesco event is nothing more than an attempt by the Obama campaign to offset the funds that they have given up by flipping on public campaign financing and an opportunity to force 60,000 supporters to engage in volunteer activities they might not have otherwise participated in.

J Brown
August 21st, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers



Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

The Chicago "Reform" Politicians Obama Supported! [Guest Post]

Submitted By Mountain Sage

Barack Obama has been hailed as a reformer, one who stands for change and hope, yet when given the opportunities to actually be part of reforming the corruption that is Chicago politics, Obama took a pass.

A candidate who says he can reform Washington politics, Obama evidently didn't see a need for reform in Chicago, or he found Chicago's political machine too tough to take on.

In the 2006 election for Cook County Board President, Barack Obama chose not to endorse his long time friend and reformer Forrest Claypool who was running against John Stroger in the Democratic primary. Claypool was running a strong campaign and would have helped advance the causes that Obama purports to believe in. Stroger was a machine boss whose administration was racked with scandal and ridden by patronage and yet, Obama chose to sidestep an endorsement.

In a type of bipartisan move that Obama claims to support, Republicans and Democrats joined to support the candidacy of Forrest Claypool. Claypool won the support of many newspapers, including the Chicago Tribune, the Chicago Sun-Times, Crain's Chicago Business, the Daily Herald, the Daily Southtown, and others. In addition, he was endorsed by Rep. Rahm Emanuel and Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn.

To give you a little background on Claypool consider his reputation for reform. In 2002, Claypool waged a fierce campaign and made a run for the Cook County Board in which he upset the incumbent Commissioner. Claypool allied himself with commissioners Larry Suffredin(D) and tony Peraica (R). In addition they were joined by Commissioner Mike Quigle and Gregg Goslin and were called "the Rebel Five".

The coalition of the Rebel Five attacked and defeated Stroger's FY 2004 budget that planned to raise the county sales tax and create a lease tax on rentals. A feat that the Chicago Sun-Times hailed with the headline Hell Freezes Over: Cook County Board rejects Stroger's budget.

The 2006 primary choice was clear...change or old style Chicago politics.

Stroger, after suffering a stroke shortly before the election, won the primary. After months of incapacitation, Stroger finally dropped out and was replaced on the ticket by his son, Todd Stroger instead of the much more qualified Claypool. Todd Stroger was serving as the Chicago alderman for the 8th Ward. Outraged by the Cook County Democratic Party's manipulation of the ticket, one Democrat went so far as to endorse the Republican opponent, Tony Peraica. (That move sounds familiar.)

This time Obama did make an endorsement. In a letter signed by both Barack Obama and Dick Durbin, they said of Todd Stroger, "Todd is a good progressive Democrat..." and continued with enthusiastic and glowing rhetoric concerning Todd's experience.

Eric Zorn of the Chicago Tribune saw things much differently. He said of Todd Stroger, "Yet, of course, the record reveals that Stroger is an unimaginative legislative drone whose reform credentials are wholly imaginary--an unlikely trailblazer to a new era." Scott Jacobs of The Week Behind calls Todd Stroger a "party hack".

Todd Stroger won the election, in part thanks to Barack Obama's endorsement and in February 2007, Carol Marin of the Chicago Sun-Times summarizes Stroger’s first 6 weeks in power:


In the short six weeks that he’s been in office, Stroger has behaved like an entitled brat. Private elevator. Entourage of bodyguards and coat holders.

He’s handed big salaries and ridiculous raises to his relatives and friends, while deriding questions about his mostly undelineated 17 percent cuts in vital services to the poor. He’s lacked the courage to face public criticism, skipping every public hearing on his budget where citizens were invited to attend. Hundreds showed up. Stroger never did.

Little wonder he was the lone elected official loudly booed at Barack Obama’s recent rally.


Todd Stroger stayed true to form.

And this is only one example of Obama's political machinations....let's not forget in January 2007, Obama endorsed Mayor Daley for re-election after having said in 2005 (referring to Daley) that "some of the reports I've seen in your newspaper, I think, give me huge pause." (Chicago Sun-Times)

I would think that a "reformer" would have found Chicago a perfect place to engage in reform, but when given the opportunity Obama instead endorsed and supported the old Chicago political machine. Why would I think that he has any intention of changing anything in Washington, D.C.?

Click Here To Read More Articles By Mountain Sage

Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Monday, August 18, 2008

THE FUNDAMENTAL ISSUE Highlights Obama and McCain's Fundamental Difference!

Saturday evenings forum at Saddleback was undoubtedly John McCain's best performance of the year and highlighted the difference in handling direct questions between McCain who has always been a fan of open town-hall events and Obama who prefers indirect, scripted and prepared speeches. Nearly every political pundit agreed that McCain's "straight-talk express" was back in full force as he answered nearly every question with simple, straight and spin-less answers.

Unfortunately, however, political bloggers following the main stream medias lead have been somewhat successful in framing the analysis of the forum around the "Abortion" issue. Now don't misunderstand me, I am not trying to de-emphasize the importance of the abortion debate; but understand, that the abortion issue, like other issues, are used by parties for one reason and one reason only: To Divide Us and Distract Us. Social issues are important, but they are issues whose importance and popular views will forever be debated; whether it was 100 years ago, today, or 100 years into the future. The abortion issue, today, is perhaps the most divisive of these issues.

Shortly after the end of the final Democratic Primary there was a rash of articles and reports flowing from left-wing organizations that openly attacked John McCain and his pro-life stance. These attacks, many of which were false and misleading, were designed simply to cloud the debate and values of Clinton supporters in an attempt to unite them around Obama. Once again, following Saturday's Saddleback forum, we find ourselves entrenched in the abortion debate and overlooking what should be highlighted as the fundamental difference between Barack Obama and John McCain.

Our government and all nations' governments first and foremost function is to protect the sovereignty of their nation. As such, we should demand that our nation's leadership prioritizes national security as the most important function. Without the maintenance of our sovereignty then all of the economic and social reforms that we institute will prove futile.

On Saturday Night both John McCain and Barack Obama were handed a softball question on the issue of National Security. Every person with even the most rudimentary knowledge of world history would agree that "evil" does exist in this world. Additionally, I would contend that nearly every reasonably thinking person living in the U.S., Europe and Eastern Asia would agree that terrorism or terrorist organizations are the epitome of "evil" in today's world. Yet when asked the question, Senator Obama without hesitation declared, "We see evil in Darfur. We see evil sadly on the streets of our cities." Oddly enough, Obama who had responded without hesitation, never mentioned terrorist organization including Al-Quaeda who is responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent civilians throughout the world.

John McCain on the other hand, fittingly and without hesitation, answered Al-Quaeda and Usama Bin Laden. Obama and McCain's answers highlight a major difference in the role that the United States plays in world. If Ronald Reagan or John Kennedy had been asked that question, I highly doubt that they would have answered anything other than the obvious "Evil Empire". For Obama's part, I felt his answer spoke volumes; he could have said Al-Quaeda, or terrorists in general, or the rise of Islamic or or other fascism. There are any number of answers that Obama could have offered that would have demonstrated some ability of judgement in regards to threats to this nation. Instead, he immediately focused on the Sudan and "the streets of our cities".

Our nation's security is the absolute primary responsibility of the Commander In Chief of the United States of America. Without security and the protection or ours and our allies' interests no level of economic or social reform could enjoy long-term success. Although there is no doubt that "evil" exists in the Sudan and even on certain streets in our cities, there is no greater threat to our nation than the "evil" that seeks to destroy us; and there is no greater "evil" in this world than those who would seek to destroy that "shining city on the hill" that has defended freedom and represented all that is "good" for 232 years.

This is the debate that the McCain campaign and the supporters of freedom should be engaged in. This is the most fundamental issue of every political campaign. This is the fundamental belief that separated the greatest presidents from the rest.

J Brown
August 18th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Be sure To Subscribe To Our FeedClick Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Obama Campaign Blows Through $56 Million Only To Lose Ground

I have to admit that I was delightfully shocked when the Obama campaign released their fundraising figures for the month of July. Mine and perhaps everyone's first surprise is that Obama's fundraising once again fell far short of the lofty $100 million per month goal that his campaign set out in June when he withdrew from public financing. But the Obama campaign did not just miss their goal, the fell far short. In the month of July, the campaign claimed to have raised $51 million, or $1 million less than during the month of June.

Although the Obama campaign claimed 65,000 new donors during the month of July, they also claimed, according to statements made to LA Times reporters, to have a donor base of close to 2 million people. The rhetoric is somewhat questionable considering that the campaign reported 1.6 million donors at the end of June. In reality, much of Obama's July fundraising was obtained through large fundraisers and large donors. I expected his fundraising to top Junes numbers just because of the large fundraising events that he participated in during the first days of July. For instance, according to new reports, two fundraising events at the beginning of July in which Obama appeared with Hillary Clinton netted a combined $10 million dollars.

The real shock to the system was the release of fundraising figures suggesting that the Obama campaign's cash on hand fell to $65 million, which suggests that the campaign not only spent the entire $51 million that they raised in July, but an additional $6-$7 million from their cash on hand. July traditionally represents the most inexpensive and least active period of a presidential campaign; so deficit spending in July would suggest that the Obama campaign has serious concerns about their ability to compete in key battleground states.

The McCain campaign also spent more money than they took in during the month of July, but for different reasons. McCain, who opted for public financing is required by law to spend a majority of the money he raises prior to the convention when he will receive his $84 million influx of federal money. Obama on the other hand has no such requirement.

According to the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post, much of Obama's increase in spending can be attributed to the thousands of paid campaign workers he has hires and 131 recently opened field offices in battleground states. In addition, Obama has already spent millions on campaign ads in those battleground states. For instance, in Florida, the Obama campaign spent over $5 million during the month of July on television ads; an amount that is unprecedented but has garnered nearly no results.

Obama's spending is not about to subside, the field offices he opened will cost millions to maintain, and as polls tighten in some traditional blue states Obama may be forced to open up even more field offices. Obama's spending strategy has been considered by many to be somewhat premature considering that the election is still three months away. Many also question the massive spending on a ballooned "paid" campaign staff and the opening of 118 more field offices than that of his opponent.

The more disconcerting news for the Obama campaign and their massive spending efforts is the lack of results that the approximately $57 million in spending produced. At the beginning of July Obama had a 5-7 point lead in most major polls, a number that has shriveled away throughout the month. Today, Obama and McCain are in a statistical dead heat. Obama, just as he did in the primaries, has narrowly focused his campaign on specific states and population bases. In Florida, it is believed that his campaign spent over $10 million in July. Obama now has 32 field offices in Florida to McCain's 3; but although Obama was able to close the polls in Florida in early July, the trend has once again headed in John McCain's figures.

In Missouri, a state that was a statistical dead heat at the beginning of July and which the Obama campaign opened up 29 new field offices, is now considered to be squarely in John McCain's column as poll after poll put McCain 5-7 points ahead. The same trend has occurred within states such as Ohio and most recently Colorado, a state that many have assumed would tilt to Obama but has shown a McCain advantage in the most recent polls.

The Obama campaign has more reason to be concerned than most people realize. Obama's significant Electoral Advantage has nearly disappeared since June, and if McCain could hold on to Colorado or swing a state such as Michigan or Indiana, he would hold the electoral advantage. The bigger problem for the Obama campaign is that the campaign has focused largely on new voter registration efforts which are extremely expensive and traditionally produce less than desirable results. Additionally, the Obama campaign's concerns continue to grow as John McCain continues to gain support from Conservative Republicans who have not yet openly supported McCain. Most analysts have agreed that considering McCain's independent appeal, if he could maintain over 90% supports from Republicans he would take the White House. Today, most polls suggest the McCain's Republican support continues between 85%-88%.

As the campaign heats up this month, both candidate's expenses are going to skyrocket, but Obama's enormous "paid" staff expenses are going to continue to hamper his efforts. The Obama campaign does have one fundraising wild-card left to play (I will be discussing this in an article tomorrow), but his campaign must begin to better manage their expenses on efforts that produce results.

J Brown
August 18th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Be sure To Subscribe To Our Feed

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Saturday, August 16, 2008

Obama Campaign Angry That McCain Won't Disavow The Obama Nation?

I apologize, but isn't there an whiff of arrogance in the air today. Yesterday the Obama Campaign attacked John McCain for refusing to discredit Jerome Corsi's best seller The Obama Nation . Apparently the Obama campaign has not figured out that John McCain, not Jerome Corsi, is his opponent.

In a statement issued by Obama spokesman Hari Sevugan, he stated, "While the smears piled up and the lies were exposed, John McCain spent six days in silence and on the seventh day said we should have a sense of humor. "John McCain's response to this discredited book speaks volumes -- he is a George Bush candidate running a Karl Rove campaign with a Dick Cheney sense of humor."

Corsi's book which currently sits atop the NY Times best seller list is likely to remain in that slot for at least the next two week after the Obama campaign waited nearly 2 weeks to acknowledge the book. There attacks which almost two weeks after the release have only proven to fuel "buzz" around the book and increase The Obama Nation sales.

As far as the Obama Campaign's attack upon McCain for his lack of condemnation, perhaps the McCain campaign should ask where Barry's condemnation was over the past three months of hate-filled attacks by Obama Surrogates and Left-Wing websites like Huffpo and Daily Kos. But yet the arrogant nature of the Obama campaign once again proves their belief that they are somehow entitled to run their opponents campaigns.

The Obama Campaign needs to give up their futile attacks on The Obama Nation , after all the more they attack the book the more interest is spurned in the book. The campaign should have gone on the offensive before the book was released, but perplexedly waited until nearly two weeks after the books release. Perhaps the Obama campaign should consider addressing more serious issues than what lies atop the NYT & Bookscan's bestseller lists.

So while the McCain campaign continues to talk about the Economy, Energy Prices, The War On Terror and Russia's Invasion of Georgia; the Obama Campaign talks about The Obama Nation

J Brown
July 15th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Friday, August 15, 2008

Warner Brothers Arbitrarily Delays Harry Potter Release Until July, Online Petition Gathers 17,000 Signatures In Just Hrs.

Update: August 17th - Contacted By Another Blogger Who Wanted Help Setting Up An Email Contact Form Like Ones We Have Used On Our Site. As A Result, Accio Dumbledore's Army has set up an easy the Harry Potter November Release Email Initiative that everyone should participate in. With one click send emails to media outlets and WB executives. I would recommend everyone do it

CLICK HERE FOR THE NOVEMBER RELEASE INITIATIVE

With news broadcasts dominated by election coverage, the Edwards scandal and Russian Invasion of Georgia, the news has been slow to spread that Warner Brothers announced yesterday that they were postponing the November Release of Harry Potter: Half-Blood Prince until July of 2009. If you hadn't previously heard the news then I apologize for being the one to break it to you.

In the immediate wake following Warner Brothers announcement, Internet rumors spread attributing the delayed release to the Writer's Guild Strike this past spring. However, upon further clarification by Warner Brothers it now seems that the movie is completed and that the delay was an arbitrary decision made be Warner Brothers Executives. In a press release issued by WB they announced that the Writer's Guild strike this past spring had caused delays in blockbusters previously scheduled for release during the Summer of 2009. As executives faced a likely drop in revenues next year accompanied by the overwhelming success of The Dark Knight this summer, they made the decision to spread out their revenues by delaying the November Potter release. As a result it is now clear that a lack of Executive planning accompanied by the Writers Guild Strike have caused the delay.

As news spreads that the unnecessary delay was caused by Warner Brothers Executive, tens of thousands of Potter Fans are flocking to websites such as Mugglenet to express their sorrow-turned-outrage. At some point yesterday an angry or upset Potter fan made the decision to start an online petition to send a message of condemnation to Warner Brothers Executives. The Petition can be found here: Harry Potter 6 Petition.

As a Harry Potter fan I am personally outraged that WB Executives would make this decision. In a LA Times article published earlier today, Warner Brothers President Alan Horn, stated, "Warner currently is riding high with "The Dark Knight," the Batman film that also stars Bale. The grim super-hero movie has taken in $452 million in the U.S. since its July 18 release, making it the second-highest grossing film ever. To some degree, that success motivated Warner to shift ."

On a personal note, what a low-life piece of *$@^. I have 2 children who, tomorrow morning, I will crush when the only movie they have looked forward to this fall has been cancelled because WB executives utterly failed to better plan their release schedule. Ultimately what these executives fear is that increased revenues driven by the Potter and Dark Knight release this year would lead to shareholder outrage when revenues fall next year. These few executives are doing nothing more than covering their own asses at the expense of the very fans who have handed them their success.

What a shame!

J Brown
August 15th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics




Be Sure To Sign The Potter Petition

Howard Dean Throws The Race Card Calls Republicans The Party Of "White" People!

Isn't it ironic how every time the 'race card' is played it is always from a leading member of today's Demockacratic Party. Today, while speaking at a press conference Howard Dean brought race front and center once again when he tauted the Democratic Party as a party where minorities and women are more successful than the "white people". In his remarks Dean conveniently stated, ""If you look at folks of color, even women, they're more successful in the Democratic party than they are in the white, uh, excuse me, in the [laughs] Republican party."

Click Here To See the video of Dean's Demockery at Breitbart

Another day in the life of Obama and Dean's New Politics Of Non-Divisiveness and Non-Distraction.

Be Sure To Come Back And Read Up On Our Latest Articles Including Our Weekly Friday Coffee Break!

J Brown
August 15th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Obama's Grand Gesture To Clinton Supporters? Now The Rest Of The Story

Media outlets around the nation heralded the news yesterday that Hillary Clinton's name would finally be placed in nomination and that a roll call would take place at the upcoming Democratic National Convention. The story was considered important because of the 2 months of lobbying by Clinton's supporters to secure her place on the DNC ballot. Although media outlets were quick to report the news, most were just as quick to overlook the downside to the so-called victory for Clinton. After all, you can't have a "deal" without concessions by both sides.

In reality, yesterday's decision is nothing more than another propagandist message put forth by the Obama campaign and the DNC to attempt to re-attract Clinton supporters back to the Democratic party. Clinton's name being "placed in nomination" is essentially pointless considering that the agreement also called for Clinton to release her delegates; a move that will all but assure the nomination of Obama. Why Is This Important?

Simply put, the DNC and Obama campaign have exerted enormous pressure upon both pledged delegates and Superdelegates to support the presumptive nominee. In several cases, such as in Wisconsin and Colorado, State Parties have threatened and attempted to strip the credentials of delegates that have openly criticized Obama or refused to support him. Other delegates who are office holders. Additionally, other delegates have been threatened that the DNC would cut off any campaign funding if they did not fall in line. As a result of Clinton releasing her delegates, it's safe to say that enough delegates will switch their vote (for the sake of Party influence) so as to create a wide-enough margin to protect Obama's nomination.

The media has done an outstanding job of painting the "deal" as a victory for Clinton supporters, but in reality it is a meaningless and empty gesture that by no means represents the principle of 'self-determination'. Never in the history of the Democratic Party has a nominee had to make such concessions in order to achieve recognition by the Party. Yet, the Obama campaign and DNC have made it apparent that they are not willing to allow any semblance of Democracy to filter into the convention unless it has been manipulated to their advantage.

Since January, millions of American's have fallen prey to a propaganda machine and marketing campaign that has "legitimized" a candidate that has called for unity but has caused severe divisions within the broader base of his own party. Clinton supporters have awoken to a new world in which the traditional spin of the media and party leadership no longer blinds them. I only hope that they can raise their voices loud enough to expose this ridiculous "deal" as just another diversion and distraction from Obama's new Demockacratic Party.

J Brown
August 15th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Thursday, August 14, 2008

FCB: A Thank You From Jerome Corsi Plus Reader Offers

Friday Coffee Break - Our Weekly Break From Politics As Usual And A Reminder To Make Extra Time For Your Family. The Friday Coffee Break offers a needed distraction from politics and reviews family-centered books, movies and products.

Over the next week our readers will see a few changes to our site including a new slew of advertisers, the addition of categorized posts, and addition of our Presidential Speeches Collection. This past Monday I received an email that I had to confirm and now would like to share with you:
Date: 8/11/2008 1:26:39 PM Central Daylight Time
From: Deleted

Thanks Jarid,
I really appreciate
your support. The purchases from your readers are very much
appreciated.

Best wishes,
Jerome Corsi


I deleted the email addresses as it included both his public WND address and a private address. Regardless of your politics, its' still a Thank You meant for my readers. Now onto some special a review and special offers just for our readers.

This Weekend sit down and enjoy a movie or two with your entire family. My choice for family viewing this week is a recent hit franchise Disney's The National Treasure.

The National Treasure and The National Treasure II, not only offer excitement that the entire family can enjoy, but also offers an opportunity to spark the imagination and interest in our History within our children. Both movies offer of well formed and seamless mixture of Historical fact, myth and fantasy that are bound to raise questions from your children. Although the National Treasure series has been criticized for it's use of conspiracy theories and historical myth, I contend that the benefits of historical awareness far outweigh the twisting of historical fact. After watching the movies, especially the first one, my 7 year old was filled with questions as surrounding the historical monuments, documents and people referenced in the movie.

As you know, there is a serious lack of history-based education within our schools and I welcome any movie that can help raise interest in the proud heritage of our nation.

In addition to the National Treasure Movies be prepared for the upcoming release of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.

If your family enjoys movies and you enjoy movie-theater popcorn then I have to recommend that everyone purchase a product my family has fallen in love with. Last Christmas, I finally broke down and purchased a Nostalgia Hot Oil Popcorn Popper for our media room. My family absolutely loves fresh popcorn but I have never really enjoyed microwave brands. Now hot-oil poppers are not all fun and games, after all it is a hot-oil popper. The product below, which is the one that I own, is their smallest and most economical popper, but they do have larger poppers available. The product will not pop every kernel and the steam from the popping process can leave an oily film in the collection chamber, as a result, you have to take two minutes to clean out the kernels when your done. But the benefits far outweigh the clean-up. Most grocery stores or your local GFS carry the popcorn oil, which also serves as the same topping used in theaters, and popcorn salt. Since we purchased the product we enjoy true movie-theatre style popcorn 2 or 3 nights a week. Trust me, my wife, who used to love microwave popcorn, can't stand it any longer. As for myself, the only time I would ever eat popcorn was at the theater and now I enjoy it 2 or 3 nights a week. If you enjoy movies, and don't mind the inconvenience of another appliance to clean up, then you have to get your family a hot-oil popper.

The popper is obviously a little expensive, but in eight months we've spent far less on the oil, seasoning and popcorn than what we have by purchasing boxes of microwave brands. The unit will eventually pay for itself. The only regret that our family has is that we didn't purchase one of the larger models.



Special Offers Just For Our Readers:
Get Free 2 Day Shipping on most products through a free 30 day trial of Amazon Prime. Just in time for some early holiday shopping. Free Trial offer ends August 31st.
Enjoy 4 Bags Of The Freshest Coffee You Will Ever Drink For Just $8.95 + Free Shipping From Our Newest Advertiser Boca Java
4 Bags of Coffee with FREE Shipping
Sign Up For U-Promise College Savings Program Today and Start Earning A Helping Hand With College Savings.

Take the time to plan for your child's future.

Blowout Sale For PDOP Readers For A Short Time Only At The Internets Largest Retailer Of Luggage, Purses and Backpacks. Over 500 brands and 4,500 bags to choose from at eBags.

125x125 Gear Up For Back To School at eBags.com

Have A Great Weekend!

Pelosi & Reid Reach Milestone In Book Sales, Kerry Sparks Surge In Sales Of Corsi's The Obama Nation!

In an article last week in which we announced the news that Jerome Corsi's The Obama Nation would top the New York Times Bestseller list, I also commented on my shock that the Obama campaign and his surrogates had not released a barrage of criticism and attacks against the book. Unfortunately for the Obama campaign it appears that their late attacks on The Obama Nation may produce results that they never intended.

Since The Obama Nation release, it's overall rank on Amazon.com and other online retailers had steadily slipped from it's best position as #2 in overall sales (#1 in Non-fiction) to #9 at the start of this week. Yet, yesterday Senator John Kerry sparked a storm of criticism over the book when he equated the book to Corsi's unexpected 2004 best seller, Unfit for Command. The attack by Kerry and subsequent attacks by the Obama Campaign, their surrogates and Obama-infatuated media appears to have had a negative effect. Today, online sales of The Obama Nation surged on the news of the criticism driving sales on Amazon.com back to the #2 overall rank. Prior to Kerry's remarks the silence strategy may have been the best strategy for the Obama Campaign to take, after all, buzz around the book was diminishing within the mainstream media and the online blogging community. Yet, Kerry's remarks have re-established interest in the book, making The Obama Nation a top search on Google, and expanded that interest to a new round of voters who previously never would have purchased The Obama Nation.

The Obama campaign cannot be happy with the firestorm that Kerry has created, but I'm sure that Mr. Corsi enjoys the extra attention. On the same note, I can also imagine that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are wishing for a little bit of "Kerry Love" this evening. According to BookScan as of the end of last week Pelosi and Reid's book sales have reached the monumental milestone of a combined 6,500 books.

Pelosi who has spent her time since adjourning congress on a $35 per person book signing tour, has managed to sell only 4,480 books in the past month. Pelosi's power rank on Amazon has dropped to an abysmal 2,798. On the other side of Capital Hill Senator Reid's book, The Good Fight, which was released nearly three months ago has sold slightly over 2,000 copies. Perhaps Reid and Pelosi should encourage John Kerry to launch a public attack against them so that they may cover their advance.

Be sure to pick up your copy of Jerome Corsi's The Obama Nation today and enjoy free 2 day shipping on this and millions of items with a free trial membership in Amazon Prime.

J Brown
August 14th, 2008



Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 212,300 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Obama Is Not An Appeaser, He Is An Indecisive Idealist & Just As Dangerous!

In our political world, detractors of candidates that are often seen as weak on foreign policy (carrot carriers) are often mistakenly tagged as appeasers. Such is the case with Barack Obama in this election cycle.

Appeasement is a term that is thrown around too often. By definition, appeasement is simply a belief that by meeting your enemies’ demands for power or territory; they will quench their insatiable appetite for power and become more cooperative. Obama doesn't want to give away the farm; he just doesn't understand the dangers in foreign policy idealism.

As an example, Teddy Roosevelt was the first US president to truly define a global US foreign policy. He set forth a path whereas the US would once again begin enforcing the Monroe Doctrine to protect against the intrusion of colonial powers in South & Central America. He was the first president to launch a global initiative to send a message to the colonial powers that we were to be an economic and military superpower and would protect our interests; and he was the first president to win accolade among other world leaders. Roosevelt was boisterous and firm, yet his respect among foreign powers was reflected in his ability to end the Russo-Japanese War and prevent the breakout of a war between Germany and France over their Moroccan dispute. Roosevelt never attempted to win over the hearts or minds of the colonial powers, his actions and principled strength earned him the respect of foreign leaders. When the Western states were overburdened by an influx of Japanese Immigrants (fleeing a suffering Japanese economy) driving down wages and placing a strain on the Western Economy; Roosevelt did not try to solve the problem by the US controlling immigration, rather he warned the Japanese that the United States was ready to pass the Japanese Exclusion Act which would effectively block trade with the nation and block employment to Japanese Workers thus driving them back to their homeland. The Japanese government, although not happy, put controls in place to limit the number of Japanese headed to America. Roosevelt was often criticized at home for his boisterous foreign policy, but nonetheless he was well respected, liked and feared by foreign leaders which led him to become the first president to win the Nobel Peace Prize.

On the other hand, as the result of a split in the Republican Party, Woodrow Wilson won the 1912 election by plurality. Wilson's stated foreign policy was not that dissimilar to that of Barack Obama. Wilson spoke highly of America's leadership role in the world and moral responsibilities, while at the same time calling for end of the use of military intervention. Wilson talked highly of the need to abandon the big stick policies of Roosevelt and called for a renewed use of verbal diplomacy in protecting the cause of freedom around the world. Yet, Wilson's stated foreign policy was never exercised as he intended, his foreign policy was mired with shifting positions. The President who so highly touted the use of diplomacy would eventually establish a long term military presence in countries such as the Dominican Republic and Cuba. He was heavily criticized for his ineffective use of limited troop actions in response to aggression by Mexico; and was silent when the Mexican government seized American Oil Interests. By the end of World War I, even our allies viewed Wilson as indecisive, idealistic, naive and arrogant. Yes, publicly, he was well liked, when he toured Europe following WWI he was treated like a rock star to record crowds that gathered to follow his every move. But on the diplomatic front, European leaders took advantage of his naivety and eventually drafted the Treaty of Versailles; the most lopsided treaty in history which set the stage for the birth of European Fascism, Socialism and Asian Imperialism. By time Wilson had abandoned his fourteen points plan in return for the formation of the League of Nations, Americans were so frustrated and disheartened that we would enter a 20 year period of isolationism.

From his rhetoric to conflicting statements on Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, and Venezuela, Barack Obama has already established a record of indecisiveness in dealing with foreign powers. His reaction to the Russian invasion in Georgia this week, whereas he failed to recognize that it was Russia who violated international law, highlights that indecision. Time and time again, Obama has shown an utter failure to distinguish between ally and foe. He has criticized our relationship with Middle Eastern Allies such as Saudi Arabia while calling for renewed relations with Iran. He has made conflicting statements that have led to outrage among both Israeli's and Arabs concerning Jerusalem, and he has failed to recognize the re-expansion of "The Bear" that so many analysts have warned us about for years.

Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan are the only Presidents to ever achieve the same level of respect as FDR's cousin Teddy. Both of these men were internationalists who fought diligently to re-build our military and re-establish a wider role for the US in international affairs. Each of these men faced their own challenges on Foreign Policy. FDR, who admittedly claimed his cousin as his mentor, worked tirelessly and systematically to rebuild our military and prepare for the rising threats that he saw. When Roosevelt took office in 1931, he supported the Stimson Doctrine which called for economic and an increased military presence in Asia, but Roosevelt faced unadulterated isolationists within both the Republican and Democratic Parties. The political environment never allowed FDR to move as quickly on re-establishing a Strong US Foreign policy as he would have liked, but if it were not for his systematic efforts and preparations, we might not have been as prepared to act when WWII broke out. When Reagan took office, he also faced a similar weakness in US military strength and foreign policy. Reagan, like TR spoke with a sharp Rhetoric and was willing to back up his words with action. Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher working together were a powerful diplomatic force in the 1980's. They earned the respect and admiration of fellow world leaders including Gorbachev. They're clear vision and undeniable message were never misconstrued by our enemies; when Reagan spoke there was no question of his position.

Obama is not an appeaser. He is simply indecisive. Like Wilson, he speaks in an eloquent language and of the need to renew American Leadership. Yet, unlike Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, Obama does not have the ability to call it like he sees it. None of these leaders, who I view as the greatest leaders of the past century, believed in the notion of neutrality or indecisive action. When they saw evil, the pointed it out and acted to counteract its influence. They all believed that the strength of our Foreign Policy should be based upon support of allies, counteracting the influence of our enemies, and a placement of US interests first.

If Barack Obama becomes President we will enter into a four year period in which our foreign policy is shaped by an unadulterated stance of neutrality. Obama's presidency will weaken our position in the world by abandoning long-standing alliances and a lack of clearly defined American positions. His presidency will look like the meeting of the Big 5 at Versailles in 1919, and will undoubtedly result in policies which further the interests of other nations at the expense of long-term global & economic security. The most successful presidents of the past century had one thing in common: They defined leadership by their ability to clearly define those nations acting against US interests and they took action to counteract their influence. They did not seek to understand or accept the positions of those who oppose freedom and they never viewed neutrality as a means of furthering US security. John McCain may never rise to the level of these great leaders, but he understands foreign policy history, understands that leadership is built upon taking a position and defining friend and foe, and he understands first-hand the evil that exists in this world.

J Brown
August 14th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 250,000 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Understanding Georgia - A Progressive Democrats' View [Guest Post]

Before you start protesting against the possibility of war with Russia, consider this…

By: Laura Schneider

Remember when Khrushchev pounded his shoe on the conference table with JFK? He said he would “bury us economically.”

Well, here we are in two wars we cannot afford, with our troops stretched paper thin, with our economy in shambles, and in debt up to our ears to China, Saudi Arabia and others that we can scarce call our true friends.

Do you think this did not figure into Putin’s calculations? Don’t think for a minute that Putin did not carefully choose this moment for that very reason. Putin is not our friend.

Putin controls Russia. He has been taking over newspapers and media in Russia for years now. he has been assassinating journalists that don’t “quote the party line” (sound familiar?). He has systematically done all the things that Hitler did to take control of the Germans in building the Third Reich.

Putin isn’t playing. He has chosen his moment carefully, when America is at her very weakest in my lifetime. Not just weak militarily or economically, but weak in terms of our “brand” and our ability to influence the world to do “the right thing.”

Putin is not our friend. And he knows how to play diplomacy and its slow pace to his advantage militarily. He could care less about negotiating. Negotiating is for fools who don’t understand what he is up to. And that is not a neo-con talking, that is a progressive liberal who understands the ultimate goal that Putin has for Russia.

What’s Russia’s motive?
His goal, as an old KGB agent, has always been to reconstitute the Soviet Union, only bigger and better and more powerful economically.

How does he do that? By controlling the flow of oil to the world.
Hoe does he accomplish that? By controlling all the territory from Russia to the Persian Gulf.

Right now, Iran is a pseudo-satellite of Russia, and is blind to Putin’s true intent. By the time Putin reaches Iran and annexes it, it will be all over but the shouting. We must stop him now or face another world war with him in control of the majority of the world’s oil reserves.

China and India
China is dependent on oil, actually more addicted to it than we are, as is India. Putin and Russia have always been concerned about China’s size and population (military strength). What better way to control China than through oil? it is no mistake that Chavez has been negotiating with China to supply them oil instead of the U.S., and Chavez and Putin are big buddies.

So, controlling the world’s oil would put Putin in virtual control of China and India, or at least put their economies under his control, which is virtually the same thing.

The End Game
How long could the Western world last without the flow of oil from the Persian Gulf? A month? Longer? Even with rationing, if gas goes to $12/gallon, how will our economy survive that kind of hit that quickly? Not to mention the need for gasoline and petroleum products for our war effort.

What must we do?
NATO must step up with America’s leadership to prevent another world war, which will take place if we appease Putin and let him build strength, just like we did with Hitler and Stalin.

If you want to know where appeasement gets you, just Google Neville Chamberlain.

To Read More Articles By: Laura Schneider click here to visit her weblog.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Ridiculous Headline Of The Day: Obama Cancels Vacation Because Of Georgian Crisis!

For once, I'm not going to launch an attack on Barack Obama, but rather point out the ridiculous reporting over the past 24 hours that has led to and publicized Obama cancelling his Hawaiian Vacation.

It is true that Obama should make public appearances and address the hostilities that occurring within Georgia, just as John McCain should. However, since the hostilities have broken out, every five minutes we have heard someone in the media state that Obama should "act presidential" and cancel his vacation. Why??

Let me put this in terms that even Obama supporters can understand. Barack Obama is not the President of the United States, he has no control over foreign policy and zero influence on the shaping of global foreign policy. None, Zilch, Zero... So what is the point, outside of propagandist purposes for him to "return to work". He is powerless and although he and his 300 Foreign Policy Advisers can sit around an auditorium and discuss what they cannot do, it will still remain a futile gesture.

Like it or not, the President of the United States, establishes and carries out US Foreign Policy, and although both candidates may differ from the President on how the US and world should react, they have one duty and one duty only. The should make it clear that although they will discuss the crisis, they are not the President and fully support the efforts of the President in working with EU leadership to end the crisis.

There is absolutely no need for Obama to cancel his vacation and the media should be ashamed of itself for forcing the issue that is only an issue because of the media. Obama cancelling his vacation because of this crisis is the equivalent to Nancy Pelosi calling back congress to address the Georgian crisis; they are both exercises in futility.

So what can Obama do? Simple, he can act like the Senator and Party Leader that he is, make sure that he makes no statement that undermines the ongoing efforts of the administration, and cancel his vacation to return to Washington and address an issue he can do something about: Energy Prices!

At the end of the day, neither Barack Obama nor John McCain is the President (although some people may not realize this). They have no power over US Foreign Policy and the only thing they should focus upon is making sure that they make no statements that undermine the efforts of the sitting President. I actually feel sorry for Obama on this one, after all he knows he can do nothing, but his friends in the media has made such an issue that he can't even enjoy some time with his family.

J Brown
August 13th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 250,000 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article


Remembering Obama Chose Vacation Over Military TownHall Meeting!

There is an unfortunate side to a 24 hour news cycle consisting to 30 second sound bytes: A Shortened Memory.

On July 11th, Carissa Picard, managing director of the Fort Hood Presidential Town Hall Consortium announced that on August 11th, this past Monday, the group would hold a Town Hall meeting at Fort Hood consisting of Military personnel and their families. The Military Townhall meeting would eventually be sponsored by 15 different military and veterans groups including the Military Officers Association of America and the Enlisted Association of the National Guard. Additionally, CBS News had reached an agreement with the group and base to nationally televise the Town Hall forum.

John McCain immediately agreed to attend the Military Townhall meeting which would afford the candidates an opportunity to discuss issues important to our courageous men and women serving in all branches of the US Armed Forces. However, at the time, Senator Barack Obama, declined the invitation to the Military Townhall Meeting citing that his campaign had a previously scheduled event for that day. Despite repeated attempts by veterans and military groups to secure his presence at the Military Townhall Meeting, Obama's campaign continued to state his inability to attend the event because of previous commitments. As recently as August 4th, the Obama campaign reiterated that the Senator had previously scheduled an event and would be unable to attend.

Three days later, Picard and CBS would be forced to postpone the event.

So what was this previously scheduled event that Obama that was so important that the Senator would be unable to attend a townhall meeting on a US Military Base focusing on participation by our uniformed men, women and their families?

That's right! His Vacation!!!

Enough Said! I guess time on the beach, a round of golf and a meeting with 200,000 screaming Germans was more important.

J Brown
August 13th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 250,000 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article


Russians Break Truce, Georgia Burns, Europe Trembles & We Should Be Concerned!

Breaking news reports this morning have made it clear that Russian forces either no longer under the control of the Russian President or operating under non-public orders have broken the EU negotiated cease-fire that lasted less than a day. Reports surfaced throughout new agencies that a Russian convoy, including tanks were rolling deep into Georgia toward the capital of the nation. According to Associated Press writers, soldiers in the convoy waved to journalists with one shouting, "Come with us, beauty, we're going to Tbilisi!''

Other reports surfacing out of Georgia tell a much more grim tale, as reports surfaced from Gori that Russian supplied separatist forces (the ones that Georgia were initially trying to clamp down on) along with Russian Troops were looting and setting fire to homes in and around Gori. Additional reports told of Georgian civilians being systematically executed by Russian troops. Russian military officials denied that operations were continuing.

The crisis in Georgia has implications that extend far beyond the borders of the small nation. Georgia is a major supplier of energy to Eastern and part of Western Europe and the EU now has serious concerns over potential supply disruptions due to the Russian belligerence. The continued Russian aggression today also led to additional concerns from EU leaders who now must scramble to figure out how to stop the violence. The EU cease-fire that was negotiated yesterday had essentially met every Russian demand and was widely considered a Russian victory. Now What?

The continued violence is also a concern to former Soviet Republics and Warsaw Pact Nations who have faced mounting pressure from the regressive Russian Government in recent years. Ukraine in particular who has continued to face economic pressures from Russia now fears that if Georgia should fall then they will be targeted next. The Ukraine and Georgia, countries which have successfully embraced Democracy, were important resource-rich regions in the former Soviet Union and played a major role in the economy of the nation. Many within the Russian government would like to see these regions, especially Ukraine (which was the manufacturing center of the USSR) return to Russian control.

In the US, the events that are unfolding in Eastern Europe should weigh heavily upon us. First, Georgia is a sovereign nation whose borders are clearly defined by international treaty and law. The invasion of this nation is a violation of international law and if the world allows Russia to take control of regions of Georgia or the entire nation then the likely results will only be further aggression by Russia and other Belligerent Nations. Considering that our nation has long been the cleaning crew for the world, we should have serious concerns over actions which may send a message of international weakness.

The Russian government has continuously worked against the interests of the US and EU. From 2002 until the 2006, Russia and China were the nations that blocked US sponsored sanctions against Iran. Even after 2006 when China and Russia finally agreed to allow UN sanction, both nations have worked diligently to assure that sanctions did not hurt their economic interests and that sanctions were 'light'. In spite of international sanctions Russia has continued to provide military assistance to Iran; recently selling the nation advance aircraft defense and other weaponry. Russia has also utilized its influence in agreeing to sell weapons to other potentially belligerent nations such as Venezuela. Russian influence has expanded greatly under the Putin years and it seems that the former KGB leadership of the Russian government is making a play to re-establish an anti-American and anti-Western European coalition.

The circumstances surrounding and the excuses that Russia has given for their invasion of Georgia sound eerily similar to those provided by Germany during their takeover of the Rhineland and Sudetenland in the late 1930's. The world failed to act upon those clear violations of international treaties and diminished the significance of the takeover of those regions. The world can not allow Russia to continue its actions and the belief that the US and EU are powerless is absolutely absurd. There is no period in history in which peaceful nations have accepted blatant belligerence and not paid the price later on.

J Brown
August 13th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 250,000 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article


Tuesday, August 12, 2008

World Condemns Russia; Murtha Blames Georgia For Russian Invasion!

Shocked but not necessarily surprised western leaders scrambled over the past few days to bring an end to and determine how to deal the Russian invasion of Georgia. Although world leaders were obviously shocked at the timing and ferociousness of the Russian assault, they clearly were not surprised considering the regression that the fledgling Russian democracy has taken under Putin and now Medvedev's rule. Over the past few years Moscow has worked diligently to reassert military and economic pressure over the former states of the Warsaw Pact. But despite the shock, world leaders have agreed on one thing: Russia Invaded A Sovereign Nation.

Despite public confusion over the status of South Ossetia, the fact is that South Ossetia is a fully recognized part of Georgia under international treaties that Russia agreed to. Russia's claim on South Ossetia is much like the claims that were made by the Third Reich over the Rhineland and Sudetenland in the years preceding the outbreak of WWII. Like Russia this week, Nazi Germany also used the excuse that they were defending their nationals when they seized control of these regions. The world made a mistake when they allowed the so-called "cessation" of these regions in the 1930's and now it seems that some 70 years later we are on the verge of re-establishing the dangerous precedent.

NATO & EU leaders unanimously admitted on Wednesday that there would be repercussions for Russia's assault upon Georgia after they could achieve a cease-fire. However, EU and NATO promises will provide little relief to the former Warsaw Pact countries who now fear they may be next.

Over the past five days, the shock from Russia's rapid deployment and invasion of Georgia's internationally defined borders gave away to a widespread belief that the military incursion was planned well in advance. The establishment of a second front only fueled the speculation by military analysts and world leaders. Today, U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Matt Bryza told journalists that two months ago Russian Troops entered the region of Abkhazia on what they were told was a humanitarian mission to help secure and rebuild a railway. As Bryza pointed out, "Now we know the truth that these forces were there to rebuild the railway to allow ammunition and other military supplies to aid a Russian invasion."

Meanwhile in the US, lawmakers shocked by the attack stumbled to reacted to the news of the Russian invasion. Yet despite international condemnation and overwhelming US condemnation of the invasion, Representative John Murtha while speaking at a local YMCA alluded to his belief that the Russian Aggression and subsequent attacks on the Georgian civilian population was the fault of the Georgian government.

According to a local news channel, KDKA:

...Murtha says, the Georgians must realize that it was a tactical and political mistake to assume that the world community would come to their aid if they ever got into trouble with the Russians. "You have to be so careful what you say because then these countries misunderstand that you might come to help them. So we've got that problem right now in Georgia, they thought we'd come to help them and they thought that would insulate them. The administration tried to warn them 'don't get the Russian bear angry.' The Georgians made a little bit of a mistake and they're paying a heavy price."

Perhaps someone should inform Senator Murtha that it was Russia who cut off Ukrainian Energy Supplies in response to their objections of price gauging by the Russian Government and that it was Russia who launched an invasion, across internationally recognized borders, into a sovereign nation and Democratic ally.

J Brown

August 10th, 2008

Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 250,000 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article


A Democrat's View: Obama Is "Flashy Trashy"

In my ongoing attempts to bring forth the viewpoints of readers across the political spectrum, I found this post submitted by a Democrat to be a fitting description of the Obama candidacy.

Flashy Trashy
By - Mountain Sage

I remember my first house hunting experience. I had a really great real estate agent who I talked into taking me to see this one new development. I could tell he wasn't enthused but being a real estate agent he took me to see the model home anyway. When we first walked into the house I was really impressed with the way it looked. Beautiful cathedral ceilings graced the living room and dining room and sported several skylights and a fireplace took up one end of the den. At first look it was very impressive.

As I wandered around the house I started to notice that the quality wasn't what I would have hoped for....windows were cheap looking and single pane, the carpet seemed to be even less than construction grade. I picked up the brochure on the house and noticed that the insulation was as low of a grade as it could be and still meet code. I also noticed none of the appliances were energy efficient.

As we finished up the tour and stepped outside the real estate agent looked to me and asked what I thought of the house. I replied, "It’s flashy". He looked a bit dejected until I added, "it's flashy and trashy."

That's how I see the Obama campaign and Obama. God knows his campaign has been flashy. Rock concerts, a plane with his very own logo, trite but catchy slogans like yes we can and we are the ones we have been waiting for. Wow, he even had his very own Vero Possumus seal (for a short time anyway.) Yes, it's been impressive and flashy. But his campaign has also been trashy.

Some of the flashiest bits are also the trashiest. Seriously, his own version of a presidential seal? The O logo instead of the American flag on his plane? Rock concerts to pump up attendance at his speeches? Is that really the kind of ego driven campaign we expect from a potential president? If Obama were running for national event coordinator I could get with that program.

Next time you hear yes we can, ask yourself this....yes we can what? And if we are the ones we have been waiting for, what are we waiting for and where the hell have we been? Is it really too much to ask of a presidential candidate that he explain just what he's done besides put on a show?

One of his latest and "greatest" sound bites is “I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal”. Why would that be? What happened in that moment that would so change the course of humanity?

And let's not forget ......."People of Berlin, people of the world, this is our moment. This is our time," he said. This is our moment and time for what? Eating Bratwurst and drinking beer?

And let's not forget his faithful followers who have threatened, ridiculed, insulted and harassed the Democrats who won't vote for Obama. They're real class acts.... (Yes that's sarcasm.)

So, I'll give props where they are due...yes, Obama, you can put on a flashy, slick show that is hailed by the naive as somehow life changing, but I personally find it all just a bit trashy.

Just as I passed on that flashy trashy house and instead purchased a house from a proved contractor, a house that was well constructed and comfortable instead of flashy, I'll have to pass on Obama. After all, as we found out with George Bush, eight or even four years can be a long time to live with what we buy.

You can read more opininions, news and commentary from Mountain Stage at her weblog: The Mountain Sage.

Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 250,000 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

A Republican's View Of The New Silent Majority [Guest Post]

Hurray For The Silent Majority

By:Norman Velden


Before I progress it should be explained from what background I form my opinions. I am a septuagenarian, Caucasian, New York born, Floridian. I have lived a wonderful exciting life in a country at a peak in power and prosperity. I love it and my fellow Americans. I believe my fellow Americans, in their collective wisdom are the most intelligent electorate in the world. I have gained this perspective from my travels during my working years and volunteer Red Cross disaster relief work after my retirement.


Politically I am a Republican because for most of my life I have seen the Democratic party in power and I believe the middle is where we should be with a balance of ideas and where laws and reforms are based on compromise and the agreement of statesmen on what is in the best interest of our nation from a multitude of competing ideas. Unfortunately I have seen a political polarization with no room in the middle ground. I hear semantics and sophistry taking the place of logic. There is no longer any room for honest debate. If you are not totally for some position or other you are an enemy that needs to be denigrated. Where does this polarization come from, certainly not from the electorate? Maybe 47% could be considered having extreme positions on both sides of the political spectrum but I doubt it. The majority are willing to listen to both sides. But they are not willing to get into robust arguments so they are called the silent majority.


For one short period of time during this primary season I had hoped (unreasonable) for McCain to offer Hilary the Vice Presidency with a promise to support her for president in 2008 with him as her Vice President, with the Vice President using the time to develop a party of the middle. Leave the radicals of both extremes to either moderate their message and program to conform to the needs of the country or die as a political entity.I am delighted to see the movements of the moderate Democrats (Puma) becoming a power. I wish an equal force would appear within the Republican Party, although it is unlikely considering the Republican primary was honest for once and selected a moderate Republican. Mostly because the party leadership never felt it had a chance of winning the general election and was spending most of it’s time looking for a hiding place from an unhappy constituency. It is interesting to note the radicals of the party are disavowing McCain as not Republican enough, even though he is the only person that has a chance of giving the party a victory. So much for the Republican moderates.


I as, every thinking American should, hope to see Puma and all it’s multitude of supporting groups succeed, not only wish for but support and become part of their movement. If enough silent Republicans joined the Pumas movement and it became inclusive enough, it could change political America.

Submitted by Norman Velden

Campaigning For Profit: Obama To Release 3rd Book In Early September!

In a presidential campaign season that has set many firsts, we are about to experience a new 'first' from Presidential hopeful Barack Obama. In an article published by Politico, sources have learned that on September 9th, Crown Publishing will release Barack Obama's 3rd book, Change We Can Believe In: Barack Obama’s Plan to Renew America’s Promise". The release of the book will be unlike any other in modern history as it will represent the first time that Presidential Candidate has released a book while in the heat of a political campaign.

I have wondered for months what Obama would do about the $2 million advance he had received in exchange for his commitment to writing 2 additional political books and 1 children's book. After all, if he were to win the election, I assumed that book plans would have to be held until after he left office. But it appears that Obama has solved his advance problem by releasing a book that is clearly aimed at both satisfying his $2 million dollar advance and commercializing his propaganda machine.

Many pundits will analyze the book as merely a method by which Obama will spread his message. Although they will be correct in the assumption that this book release will be a massive propaganda campaign; the fact is that at the roots of the release is Obama's need to satisfy his $2 million advance.

Obama, the self-proclaimed candidate of 'change', has now proven that he is a different type of political candidate; a self-serving individual that for the first time in history is profiteering from a 'Presidential Campaign'. Presidential Candidates have released books in the past, but most books that were released were typically released toward the beginning of their run and were written and scheduled well in advance. Obama's book, however, will be different, based upon the title it is clear that the "Change" candidate, who has been absent from his post on the floor of the Senate, found the time to write a book that is clearly intended, even in title, to be a piece of campaign propaganda.

For months vocal critics of Obama, such as Sean Hannity, have proclaimed that the American public has fallen victim to Obama's marketing and propaganda campaign. But now it also seems clear that while Obama hopes the book will provide his campaign extra leverage, he also hopes that to profit from his campaign status.

Imagine, if John McCain or Hillary Clinton were to release a book just two months prior to election day. The left-wing media and blogs would attack with a ferociousness never-before-seen, yet my guess is that they will only advertise this books release.

Benjamin Franklin once wrote - "Sir, there are two passions which have a powerful influence in the affairs of men. These are ambition and avarice; the love of power and the love of money. Separately, each of these has great force in prompting men to action; but, when united in view of the same object, they have, in many minds, the most violent effects." 1789

J Brown
August 12th, 2008


Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 212,300 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Monday, August 11, 2008

Russia, Georgia And A Global Return To 1931!

Since the fall of the Soviet Union, South Ossetia has continued to be hotbed of contention between Russia and the break-away nation of Georgia. Not much unlike the Sudetenland, a hotbed of contention between Nazi Germany and Czechoslovakia, the citizens of the frontier region are split between loyalties to each nation. As a result, factions within South Ossetia have tried to break-away from Georgia even as the Georgian government has tried to maintain control. Under Putin, Russia has stepped backwards from its Democratic reforms of the early 1990's and many analysts have feared a re-emergence of Soviet-Style Russian expansion. These fears heightened after the energy stand-off between Ukraine and Russia in the past years.
There can be no doubt that the magnitude and rapid deployment of Russian forces was not only unexpected but suggests that the Russians were prepared and waiting for Georgia to re-exert government control over the region. There reaction was swift, well orchestrated and is turning brutal. Regardless of the cause of tensions between the two nation, there are certain facts that the world can not ignore. The lack of international response in light of the Russian invasion and clear targeting of civilian populations is deplorable.

The United Nations and Nato must act immediately to end this action or be prepared for aggression to break out elsewhere. Russia has violated international treaties by entering South Ossetia. Although the region is considered by many to be a secessionist region, the are is still defined as sovereign Georgian territory. It is now clear that the Russian Government has now been relegated to 'puppet' status under the control of the remnants of the KGB and Putin. Moreover, the Russian government has refused a cease-fire and escalated their military maneuvers; a move that now has the Ukraine and other former Eastern Block nations on edge.
Reports are surfacing out of Georgia of widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure and the targeting of Georgia's civilian population. According to the Times, Russian forces continue to bomb civilian targets including homes and apartment buildings, entire Georgian cities have been leveled, and Russian forces have open-fired on humanitarian agencies. The action by Russia has grown out of control as they have opened up a second front and Europe now fears of a major disruption in oil supplies.

Nato and the United Nations were entirely unprepared for this conflict to break out, and as diplomats scramble, Russia shows no signs of ending their siege. The United States and it's allies have immediately turned to the United Nations for help. The UN must act immediately and swiftly to the Russian occupation, they must demand an immediate withdrawal by Russian forces and immediately send in a peacekeeping forces. If the United Nations does not act then the US and NATO must be prepared too. Georgia is an ally of the United States, but more importantly if the free world allows Russia to stage relaunch a new expansion of the old republic, the message will resonate throughout the governments of other belligerent nations.
Following the end of Russo-Japanese War at the turn of the century, a region of China known as Manchuria become a hotbed of contention between China, the Soviet Union and Japan. The resource-rich frontier region fueled tensions between the three nations as each attempted to expand their influence. As a Chinese nationalist government began to call for an end to foreign interests in the region, Japan feared an alliance between the Communist-friendly Chinese Government and Soviet Union. As a result, in September 1931, Japan launched an invasion of Manchuria; claiming that the occupation was in response to Chinese attacks upon Japanese nationals and rail interests.

The invasion of Manchuria would later mark the unofficial beginning of World War II, the end of the influence of the League of Nation, and the start of a global descent into war. The invasion and occupation of Manchuria was a clear violation of previous international treaties and the League of Nations would take nearly three months to act against the aggression. When League of Nations finally acted it would come in the form of a global condemnation with no defined strategy or effort to end the occupation. From November of 1931 on, the League of Nations would no longer serve as the primary forum for international crisis resolution; from that point on a majority of diplomacy would take place directly between nations.

The failure of the League of Nations and former WWI allies to act upon Japanese aggression would embolden Benito Mussolini and encourage him to move forward with his plans to seize control of Abyssinia (Ethiopia) four years later.

International Belligerence often starts in the most unlikeliest of places, the only question is How Will The World React?

J Brown
August 11th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 250,000 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Sunday, August 10, 2008

United States of Communism - The Experience Of A Former Obama Supporter [Guest Post]

I had mixed feelings about publishing this post as I read it, after all it was from a former Obama supporter. But please read the entire post as it tells the interesting tale of what happens when supporters question the party line.

United States of Communism
By Lady Ann

Our freedoms are slowly being taken from us. Don’t believe it? Just take a look at what is happening within a major political party of this country.

In April of 2008, I joined a blog called Democrat Party Builder, the blog of the DNC. In the heat of the primary, passion was running high for most bloggers, no matter who their candidate of choice was. Mine was Obama. It took some time, but I eventually made friends with many, if not most of the most passionate of these bloggers, even those who supported Clinton.

Around the time of the last primary, a member of the Party Builder (hereafter known as PB), invited several Obama supporters from Barack Obama’s campaign blog site, to join the PB blog in an effect to drown out the unhappiness of Clinton supporters. Instead of working with the “dissenters”, or those who refused to fall in line with the Democratic nominee, these bloggers repeatedly insulted and goaded them. Even going as far as throwing around homophobic slurs and harassing specific bloggers.

As a supporter of Senator Obama, I was disgusted by the behavior of those other “supporters”, who I believe are an embarrassment to him, and I am ashamed to ever be lumped into their “group”.

Complaints were ignored until August when a new moderator came onto the blog.

Then something strange happened. Suddenly, Clinton supporters were silenced. My latest count is eight, but since I don’t have a way to contact many of those people outside of the PB site, I can’t confirm more.

I was furious. People I had made friends with, good and decent Democrats and AMERICANS were banned from participating in the blog. All their past blog entries and comments were deleted. None of them received any warning or notification so that they could make copies of their work. It was just destroyed in the span of a few minutes.

I knew who was responsible for Clinton supporters being silenced. She came to the blog with the purpose of silencing dissenters. When she couldn’t do it herself, she bragged that she had connections within the DNC and would get the public blog straightened out. So in my anger, I stuck out at this person. I told her to “shove it”.

How dare I use such foul language! Within minutes, my account at the site was condemned. Hours of work that I had put in towards getting Barack Obama elected, were deleted. My account was banned. I was silenced.

Unless it has happened to you, you can’t know how it feels. This is a political party that prides itself on inclusiveness, acceptance, and tolerance. Well, as I have seen, there is only tolerance if you have only positive things to say about the Party nominee and his supporters.

I was devastated to have been silenced. So I rejoined with a new name to post about my unhappiness and let my blog companions know how they could reach me. It was tolerated- until I posted a poll that showed Obama sliding in the polls. Within moments, the new account was banned.

It is ironic that just this week, the Executive Director of the DNC would send out an email inviting one of the banned members to join the PB. In the email, it states, that the site can be used to “empower Democrats”, and that you should “Speak Out”. Yet, when you do, if the moderator doesn’t like what you have to say, your account gets removed.

What a disappointment. I joined the Democratic Party officially just this spring. Previously, I had never voted for a Democrat for president. I had never donated money to a presidential campaign. I had never made phone calls and canvassed for a political campaign. Those things all changed for me, because I believed in Barack Obama. I became a Democrat because, like many other Republicans, I felt that Party left ME.

It’s funny… I watched the news on Monday afternoon, the day my blog was deleted, and I saw Chinese protesters being carried away by police in Beijing, and I felt like that was me. Not carried away in handcuffs, but silenced just the same. I feel betrayed.In the past few days, I’ve gone through a myriad of emotions. Anger, grief, disappointment, disgust… but more than anything else, sadness. In this great nation of ours, it’s a travesty that anyone’s voice would be silenced for disagreement. The saddest part about it, is those that are responsible for it, think that there is nothing wrong with what happened. Well, I don’t live in the United States of Communism, where you’re not allowed to voice your opinion, and it’s not all right with me for this to be happening here.

Sadly, these actions are a reflection on the campaign of Senator Barack Obama, and I find that if Democrats are not allowed to voice their opposition on a Democrat Party website, I just can’t support the Democratic Party or any of it’s nominees. I just didn’t think silencing the opposition was part of the Democratic playbook, and that’s something I don’t believe in.

I had so much hope coming into this election in November. Now that hope has disappeared. I’m more afraid then ever of what this country is coming to.

Submitted With Permission By: Laura Schneider
Click Here To Visit Laura's Weblog

NY Times Finally Recognizes - Obama Nation #1 Bestseller, Suskind & Freddoso To Join The List Next Week!

As we reported earlier this week, Jerome Corsi's, The Obama Nation marked it's debut this morning on the top of the New York Times Nonfiction Best Seller List. Although the list represented the extent of the Times acknowledgement of the book. The New York times in it's trademark fashion celebrated the arrival of The Obama Nation by reviewing an array of books that represent their patented radicalized-left and anti-American views. Among their featured book reviews for the American Public to enjoy were:

The Challenge - Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Descent Into Chaos- Assessing the Bush Administration did wrong in Afghanistan
This Land Is Their Land- Reports From A Divided Nation
& Disgustingly My Guantanamo Diary - An interpreter tells the story of poor Gitmo Detainees

Next week will bring even more bad news for the New York Times as Ron Suskind's, The Way Of The World, and David Freddoso's, The Case Against Barack Obama will join The Obama Nation in the #2 and #3 slots respectively.

The controversial, The Obama Nation is likely to rise as one of the top selling books of 2008 on all bestseller lists; but will face challenges in the weeks ahead as a myriad of books attacking the Bush Administration are set to be released prior to the election.

As of today, The Obama Nation held it's position as #1 atop Amazon.com's nonfiction best sellers chart and #1 for in-store sales at both Barnes & Noble and Borders.
Ron Suskind's, The Way Of The World, remains a distant second behind Corsi's bestseller, while David Freddoso's,The Case Against Barack Obama remains third in nationwide nonfiction sales.

On a more positive note, JK Rowlings, The Tales Of Beedle The Bard, continues to sell record-numbers of Pre-Orders and is likely to overtake all other books in sales when released on December 4th, just in time for Christmas.





J Brown
August 10th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 212,300 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Saturday, August 9, 2008

Changing Washington Politics - If Obama Practiced What He Preached...

Change - That funny word that surfaces every four years and is touted as is it were some new idea, some profound revelation as to how Washington functions. But this year is different, right?? We have Obama, the Change Candidate, the self-proclaimed Washington outsider that will unite this country and transcend the politics of divisiveness and distraction.

But is Obama really the change candidate? Can he really change 'politics as usual' in Washington and end the polarization that exists in Washington?

Consider this...

Obama currently has a 33% chance of becoming the leader of the free world (I say 33% chance because he is technically not the nominee of his party since his opponent has not dropped out of the race). But as of today, Obama is the presumptive nominee of his party, which by default makes him the leader of the Democratic Party. Obama currently has the power to shape the agenda of the party, restructure the DNC, and fire Howard Dean if he wished. For months we have listened to Senator Obama tell us how he is the "change" candidate and how he will end politics as usual in Washington.

My contention today is simple, if Obama was truly the candidate of change, then why is he silent when it comes to the events that are unfolding in congress today? If Obama really wanted to "change" Washington then why hasn't he demonstrated his ability to do so? After all, he is the leader of his party, but has remained resoundingly SILENT on the behavior of the fellow leadership of that party.

For instance, in the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi has used obscure parliamentary procedures to prevent the introduction of legislation and amendments on offshore drilling. Legislation that Pelosi knows has majority support and the support of 70%-75% of Americans. This month, Pelosi in the ultimate gesture of bipartisan cooperation, literally hammered the gavel and shut down congress while a colleague was speaking. Meanwhile the country continues to face a damaging rise in energy, food and consumer prices, while Pelosi is off on a whirlwind book tour as she tries to sell 3,000 books.

On the other side of Capital Hill, the Senate, unbeknownst to most Americans, is still in session. The Senators are not in town, but yes, the Senate has not adjourned. Senator Reid, who also decided that there was no need to carry out the work of the people, made the decision to go on vacation. But fearing that President Bush would appoint judges while congress was on recess, he decided that every three days a Democratic Senator would enter the gallery, pick up the gavel and then immediately hammer the gavel down. As a result, the Senate remains open, without legislation, without debate and without any Senators. But the good news is that Reid's profound use of parliamentary procedure has prevented the President from appointing judges, many of which have already been waiting for a vote for 2 years. The funny part of this however is the fact that any appointments Bush would make would only be valid until the start of the next congress in December!

If Obama was the change candidate, and truly believed his own propaganda that he will change 'politics as usual' in Washington, then why on earth hasn't he condemned and called for an end to these types of actions by Reid & Pelosi?

Obama has the opportunity to exercise his ultimate leadership role in the Democratic Party, but hasn't taken advantage of it. He has stood by silently while perhaps the two most divisive figures in politics today play games with legislation aimed at addressing the concerns of Americans.

Obama has the opportunity to put a sock in the mouths of his detractors by actually bringing change about in Washington. If he were to end the silly antics of Reid, Pelosi and Dean; force them out of their positions and condemn their polarizing actions, he would win the election by a landslide.

So again, I ask...

Is he really the "Change" candidate or is this just the self-serving "Change" Obama stands for?

J Brown
August 9th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics


Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 250,000 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

What The Media & Obama Campaign Will Never Understand About Clinton Supporters.

Let me start by stating that I am an Independent who believes, like the great leaders of the past, that our nation's first and foremost priority is to protect our sovereignty, practice sound fiscal and economic policy built upon competition, and then address shifting social & cultural issues. My politics more closely resemble that of Teddy Roosevelt than any other President. You can imagine my surprise when I started this blog 3 months ago and found 70% of my early readership coming from Hillary Clinton supporters. I am not a Hillary supporter and if she were the nominee, I would most likely not vote for her. But, I have gained new respect for Hillary Clinton, and especially her supporters, who I have discovered over the past three months share views that are not that dissimilar than mine. Yes, we do disagree on many issues, but also agree on many of the most fundamental issues that should be most important in an election.

Over the 3 months, but especially within the past week, the media has failed to fairly portray Hillary Clinton's supporters who have refused to fall in line behind Obama. The media, for their part, have painted these supporters as "bitter, middle-aged females" angered by Hillary not winning the nomination. The Obama campaign, his surrogates, supporters and media have this fantastic notion that by Hillary pledging her support to Obama that this group will unite and fall in line. Additionally, they have created a perception that the views of this group are reflected by Obama and their lack of support has little to do with politics and everything to do with spite.

In reality, what Clinton's former supporters are fighting for is a return to the pre-1968 Democratic Party. The party that produced Presidential candidates that placed the interests of their country above their own pursuit of power. Presidents like FDR, Truman and Kennedy who addressed social issues, but understood that those were not the first priority of government.

It is true, that Clinton supporters want Hillary Clinton to win the nomination, but more importantly is that in the past few months their fight has shifted from one of electing Clinton, to a platform for reforming the Democratic Party. This election has been a wake up call for Clinton supporters, who have experienced first hand the grossly biased reporting by much of the media. While they and their candidate were subjected to numerous misogynistic attacks, the media turned a blind eye. When they raised objections as to Obama's injection of race into the 'race', they were themselves accused of being racists. Only recently has the Obama campaign's tactics had light shed on them.

More importantly however is that Clinton supporters realized that their party leadership that has consistently accused Republican of suppressing the vote, turned out to have manipulated their primary system so as to disenfranchise voters in nearly every state of the union. The have awoken to realize, what many of us have known for years, that today's Democratic leadership is interested in one thing and one thing only: Power!

John McCain has been openly criticized and attacked by members of his own party, conservatives and moderates alike. Rush Limbaugh, the most well-known voice of conservatism has been relentless in his criticism of McCain. Yet, you don't see McCain supporters turning against staunch conservatives and you don't see a blatant effort to silence dissent within the Republican Party. On the other hand, millions of moderate Democrats who support Hillary Clinton have not experienced this level of welcome dissension and respect. The leadership of their own party helped by zealot Obama supporters have done everything in their power to silence any voice of dissension. Many Democrats overlooked this lack of respect for dissension when it happened to Joe Liebermann, but now notice when it has happened to them.

Clinton's supporters are a far cry from the "bitter, middle aged female" picture that the media has painted. I can tell everyone first hand, that these Men and Women are among the most respectful and articulate individuals you could hope to have a conversation with. I have followed their posts since the beginning of the summer at many Puma Sites, and although they know I am not a Clinton supporter they have welcomed my comments and been respectful towards others. Their comments are typically well thought out and seldom do you see hateful or spiteful words or attacks come from their postings. Likewise, I wish I could say the same for vocal Obama supporters whose verbal attacks against this community have ranged from name calling to death threats. Supporters with the highest level of intelligence as to leave hundreds of comments on my blog amounting to: "Mcsame, Mshame... Mcdonald's, McDonald's, Kentucky Fried Chicken and a Pizza Hut". Ok... I threw those last three in myself (a song my daughter sang when she was three, and ironically about the same intelligence).

The media and more importantly the DNC and Obama campaign have failed and apparently will never understand that for most Hillary Supporters whom have not fallen in line, the issue is now beyond the nomination of Clinton; it is now an issue of Party Reform. Clinton supporters now realize what so few others know, that political parties are dangerous. By design, their purpose is to increase party power, not further the power of the people. Our founding fathers understood this and in a time of true statesmen, warned us of the dangers of this Party Power.

The Democratic Party, led by individuals like Obama, Dean, Pelosi and Reid have been forced to show their true colors. In every action they take, they demonstrate that they are intent only upon increasing their own power. I applaud Clinton Supporters who have not fallen in line, I applaud them not because we agree on every issue, but because we agree upon the foundation of 'equal representation' and unique 'Americanism' upon which this country was founded. I am not a citizen of the world and I certainly will not commit myself to the unachievable goal of 'saving the world'. I am a citizen of the United States of America; I am proud of my nation and its 230 year heritage; I am respectful and appreciative for those who fight and have fought for this nation; and I will not stand-by as politicians allow shreds of our sovereignty and freedom to be peeled away.

J Brown
August 9th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics


Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 250,000 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Friday, August 8, 2008

Understanding Why Bush Has No Control Over The Drilling Moratorium & Why It Does Not “Expire” September 30th.

Understanding Why Bush Has No Control Over The Drilling Moratorium & Why It Does Not “Expire” September 30th.

In past weeks, I read comment after comment that it doesn’t matter whether Pelosi and Reid bring up legislation to lift the moratorium on offshore drilling, after all the moratorium expires September 30th. Therefore, as of October 1st, we can drill and Bush can veto any bill that renews the moratorium.

In reality, however, that thought process is too simplistic and does not represent how the moratorium is achieved and maintained. In reality, there is no magical bill that “establishes a moratorium on offshore drilling”. That’s right, no separate bill and no annual vote specifically on the issue. The moratorium is achieved not through banning drilling but rather through not funding the Department of Interior branch that sells the land leases associated with the ‘moratorium’ acres. Every year, congress must pass an appropriations bill for the Department of Interior, which outlines the budget for the Department and funds the agency responsible for land-leases. The moratorium is achieved by not funding the sale of leases on this acreage. The annual appropriations bill runs on a fiscal year from October 1st to September 30th when it must be renewed.

If the appropriations bill for the Department of Interior is not renewed by September 30th, then the lack of funding for the sale of Land-Leases still exists. Without appropriation, the Department cannot sell the leases to allow drilling.

Currently, Republicans on the appropriations committee have fought to add an amendment to the appropriations bill with no avail as Reid and Pelosi continue to block efforts. When the bill does come up in September, they will try again; but Pelosi & Reid will continue to use parliamentary procedure to block the amendments.

Pelosi and Reid’s plan is simple: They intend on blocking any amendments to the appropriations bill in which the bill will most likely be blocked by Republicans. They can provide temporary appropriations to keep the agency afloat until after Election Day or the start of the new congressional session.

Pelosi, Obama, and Reid hope that A) Obama will win the Presidency and B) Democrats will obtain the 60 Senate seats required to protect a Republican filibuster. Ultimately, they know that congress will have to pass an appropriations bill and if they hold out long enough they will either achieve the votes they need or achieve a compromise in their favor.

Everything they are seeking revolves around political maneuvering, but everyone needs to understand that the September 30th Expiry of the moratorium is a ‘myth’. There is no expiration date, there is no ‘moratorium’ bill, and there is only a lack of funding that will continue beyond September 30th.

The only way to win this fight is to continue to push for a vote on legislation specifically mandating and FUNDING the sale of offshore leases. Without the funding portion of the bill, the bill may fall victim to similar bills calling for border fences but never fully funded when appropriations were passed.

This is why Republicans are now pushing so hard on the issue and this is why McCain has not focused on the September 30th date.

J Brown
August 8th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 212,300 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

FCB Political Coffee Break: A Book For You & One For The Kids

For Our Readers we now bring you a welcome Coffee Break from politics as usual. Break away for a few minutes from the grind of work and from this non-stop election; take a few minutes for yourself, spend some extra time with the kids. This we bring you two non-political books for a review. One for you, and one that will spark the imagination of your children and yourself.

For The Adult Of The House -

Introducing the new release:
Assassin by the best selling author Stephen Coonts

Personal - In a follow up to his award-winning series about patriotic CIA Operative Tommy Carmellini, Coonts has once again capture the essence of American Patriotism in the War in the same way that Tom Clancy was able to capture the essence of American Patriotism in the Cold War. The book provides non-stop action in a series that is likely to make the eventual jump to the big screen.

Overview - When an Iraqi bomb kills Huntington Winchester's only child, the grieving father decides he and his privileged friends aren't doing enough to defend civilization against the jihadist threat. Winchester gets tacit approval from one of those friends, the unnamed U.S. president, for him and some other well-to-do types to finance their own private war. When al-Qaeda mastermind Abu Qasim discovers the identities of those in Winchester's group and targets them, Carmellini and his CIA boss, Adm. Jake Grafton, determine to set a trap that involves Qasim's possible daughter. Though the constant switching between various points-of-view distracts at times, the action moves swiftly to its Hollywood ending.


For The Kids:

The Tales Of Beetle The Bard - J.K. Rowling

Personal: Rowling is proving that she stills knows how to capitalize on the Harry Potter Series that sparked the imagination of tens-of-millions of Adults and Children worldwide. Although she completed the Potter saga last year, this December 4th she releases a spin-off, The Tales of Beetle The Bard. This is a pre-order, but may prove to be the best selling book of the year. Since its pre-order release, The Tales Of Beetle The Bard have topped the sales chart at every major retailer.

Amazon Review: Offering the trademark wit and imagination familiar to Rowling's legions of readers--as well as Aesop's wisdom and the occasional darkness of the Brothers Grimm--each of these five tales reveals a lesson befitting children and parents alike: the strength gained with a trusted friendship, the redemptive power of love, and the true magic that exists in the hearts of all of us. Rowling's new introduction also comments on the personal lessons she has taken from the Tales, noting that the characters in Beedle's collection "take their fates into their own hands, rather than taking a prolonged nap or waiting for someone to return a lost shoe," and "that magic causes as much trouble as it cures."

But the true jewel of this new edition is the enlightening and comprehensive commentary (including extensive footnotes!) by Professor Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore, who brings his unique wizard's-eye perspective to the collection. Discovered "among the many papers which Dumbledore left in his will to the Hogwarts Archives," the venerable wizard's ruminations on the Tales allow today's readers to place them in the context of 16th century Muggle society, even allowing that "Beedle was somewhat out of step with his times in preaching a message of brotherly love for Muggles" during the era of witch hunts that would eventually drive the wizarding community into self-imposed exile. In fact, versions of the same stories told in wizarding households would shock many for their uncharitable treatment of their Muggle characters.

Professor Dumbledore also includes fascinating historical backstory, including tidbits such as the history and pursuit of magic wands, a brief comment on the Dark Arts and its practitioners, and the struggles with censorship that eventually led "a certain Beatrix Bloxam" to cleanse the Tales of "much of the darker themes that she found distasteful," forever altering the meaning of the stories for their Muggle audience. Dumbledore also allows us a glimpse of his personal relationship to the Tales, remarking that it was through "Babbity Rabbity and Her Cackling Stump" that "many of us [wizards] first discovered that magic could not bring back the dead."

Both a wise and delightful addition to the Harry Potter canon, this new translation of The Tales of Beedle the Bard is all that fans could hope for and more--and an essential volume for the libraries of Muggles, wizards, and witches, both young and old.



Enjoy!

Thursday, August 7, 2008

Obama & Democrats: The Party Of Inclusion May Have A Gay Problem

In a story that the Main Stream Media has largely overlooked this summer, rumors are spreading of a growing rift between the Democratic Leadership and gay community. Although the DNC has tried to avoid the publicizing of the events that have occurred this summer, the rift and subsequent fallout is likely to occur prior to election day. A concern that the DNC and Obama campaign both share.

There are two events that occurred this summer that are creating problems for both the Obama campaign and DNC. First, Obama sparked limited outrage and raised questions among activists in the gay and lesbian community after reports surfaced that he was vetting Sam Nunn for the vice-presidential position. The gay and lesbian community was struck by the possibility that Obama would choose the architect of the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy that has been in force within the armed services for the past 15 years.

The larger problem for the Democratic Party however, may be the fallout from the firing of Donald Hitchcock, a former DNC Director for Gay & Lesbian Outreach. After pushing for timetables for the inclusion of gay & lesbian delegates to the parties national convention. Talks apparently broke down in May amidst objections of by African-American leaders. Shortly after the hostilities between the African-American leaders, led by Donna Brazille, and Hitchcock broke out, Hitchcock's partner launched public attacks against DNC leadership calling for the removal of Howard Dean. A short while thereafter, Hitchcock was abruptly fired.

Since his firing, Hitchcock has launched a lawsuit for discrimination and wrongful termination claiming that his firing was a result of his partner's public criticism. The DNC has denied the allegations but the story is about to blow up following a breakdown in settlement talks earlier this month.

The talks broke down in an unexpected explosive altercation between Hitchcock's attorney, Tara Jensen, and DNC attorney Joe Young. According to reports, as talks broke down leading to a trial, the DNC attorney misfiled paperwork in an attempt to push the trial back to a date following the November Elections. When confronted on the misfiling, Young allegedly lashed out at Jensen telling her not to 'Contradict Him' and to know her place. The altercation was outlined in a letter sent to the DNC by Jensen last week. In the letter Jensen stated:

"At that point, you became physically intimidating, and moved quickly
toward me, within six inches of my face. In fact, you were so close that you
spit on my face. You then proceeded to point your finger at me, and in an angry,
raised voice yelled, “Don’t you ever contradict me,” and “Don’t you ever
interrupt me.” You also told me to “know my place.”"

The altercation was apparently so heated that Hitchcock himself had to separate the two attorneys. The DNC has since issued an apology for Young's behavior.

When this trial ensues, prior to the November elections, it will be unwelcome news to the DNC and Obama campaign. Obama and Democratic congressional members need the gay and lesbian communities' vote in order to win the election. The story may also become a larger issue for a party and Obama campaign that has been accused of misogynistic behavior by disgruntled Hillary Clinton supporters. Considering that the DNC apologized for the behavior of Young, perhaps they should not only admit wrongdoing in their treatment of Hitchcock, but also denounce and fire Young for his misogynistic behavior.

Apparently, the party of self-proclaimed inclusion, is now under the control of leadership that could care less. For more including a video of Howard Deans testimony visit these sites:

Queerty - DNC, Hitchcock Lawyers Face-Off
Austin Statesment - Lawsuit Exposes Rift Between Gay & Black Leaders In DNC (Dean Video)

J Brown
August 7th, 2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 212,300 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

250,000 No Obama DNC Emails And An Opportunity to Expand Intitiative Reach!

This morning we have updated the 'Last Stand' Email Initiative to stop the nomination of Barack Obama. As of last night, we have forwarded over 1/4 million emails on the behalf of Democrats opposed to the nomination of Obama and reform of the party. To date we have targeted approximately 1/2 of the Superdelegates and plan on reaching all of them, including the Superdelegates that have pledged support to Hillary Clinton, prior to the Democratic Convention.


Now is the time to try one last attempt to convince Democrat Superdelegates to drop Obama and reform the Democratic Primary System to re-establish the rule of "equal representation". Today, I have gained a great deal of personal respect for a group of Democrats, many life-long Democrats, who have realized that their party is no longer the party of FDR, Truman and Kennedy; it is the party of McGovern, Carter, Dukakis, Pelosi and Reid. They recognize that the party which has decried disenfranchisement and pointed fingers in the past is the very party responsible for manipulating their own primary system resulting in the most widespread volume of fraud and disenfranchisement in American Political history. We may not agree on all political positions, but we agree that this nation was built upon the ideal of "equal representation" and a government that works for the people rather than to secure more power for themselves. Thank you again to all those who have donated and the list has been updated as of this morning.


Additionally, today I am glad to announce that for the first time we are able to offer other sites the opportunity to place the email initiative form on their website. The number of websites that we allow the form to be place upon will be limited. We have reached a compensation agreement with our vendor, but have been warned that if the volume of submissions threatens their servers they will shut down the form. As a result, I am not looking to make money from the form but do have to cover my costs and time for updating the form. So... please feel free to link to the our site OR for a $15 donation, more if you choose, we will send you the javascript to add the form to your own website in an effort to broaden the reach of the initiative. We are strictly limiting the number of websites we allow the form to be placed upon in an attempt to assure that the form remains properly functioning for the next three weeks. However, if traffic causes our vendor to shut down the form, we will refund any donations. If you are one of the few who have already sent a donation to help the effort, then please contact me and I will provide you with the javascript. Additionally, we will review the website prior to sending javascipt to make sure to protect against abuse.

The next update will occur on Sunday morning. Also, please remember to visit every three days to resubmit your email to the updated lists of Superdelegates.

Click Here For "Last Stand" Email Initiative For Democrats Against Obama

J Brown
August 7th, 2008

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article.

The Obama Nation In 3rd Printing & To Debut #1 On New York Times Bestseller List!

In the past week, online and newspaper attack articles have been slow to develop over Jerome Corsi's controversial new book, The Obama Nation. Last week we reported on widespread complaints lodged against the major booksellers for employees that were refusing to stock the book. But despite sporadic stocking problems, The Obama Nation has proven to be the hottest selling non-fiction book of the summer.

This week, Corsi's publisher began their third printing of the book as The Obama Nation held it's position as #1 atop Amazon.com's nonfiction best sellers chart and #1 for in-store sales at both Barnes & Noble and Borders. This morning WND passed along reports confirming that the book will make it's debut on the New York Times Bestsellers list this weekend in the #1 slot.

Criticism of Corsi's book has been surprisingly limited considering the scope of the content and allegations in the book. With limited attacks by Media Matters and other online bloggers, the Obama campaign itself has been slow to react to allegations made within the book. The limited scope of criticism is likely to change with the impending #1 position atop NYT's bestseller list, as highlighted by a Bob Breckel Editorial attacking the book at Real Clear Politics today.

Perhaps Obama surrogates have been taking a wait & see approach concerning the book or perhaps they expected sales to plummet with the release of Ron Suskinds, The Way Of The World. Suskind's controversial expose has been both heavily praised and heavily attacked since its release for its allegations concerning the Bush Administration. The Obama campaign may have expected Suskinds,The Way Of The World, to draw attention away from Corsi's book, but it appears that hope is not likely as Suskind's book currently sits 14th upon Amazon's bestseller list and a far 2nd behind The Obama Nation on the nonfiction bestsellers list.

The Obama campaign should have been better prepared for the anticipated release of The Obama Nation. Corsi's Swift Boat Book in 2004, turned out to be an unexpected #1 bestseller, and sparked a barrage of criticism and doubt that many Democrats attribute to the defeat of John Kerry. At the time of its release, the Kerry campaign failed to to act swiftly in acknowledging and addressing the allegations within the book and by time they did react the controversy had done its damage. The Obama campaign has shockingly had the same slow reaction to both The Obama Nation and David Freddoso's,The Case Against Barack Obama. The slowness of their reaction may prove damaging, especially considering the resignation of a Obama advisor this week for his radical associations.




Currently Freddoso's bookThe Case Against Barack Obama , sits third upon Amazon's nonfiction list, but like Suskind's book is unlikely to rise to the level of sales that The Obama Nation has.

The Obama campaign clearly does not want to draw attention to either Anti-Obama book, but at the same time, their overall limited response may prove to be a mistake, just as it did for John Kerry in 2004. The additional failure of Suskinds book to overthrow The Obama Nation, along with a rapid response by Administration and surrogates, may also dash Obama's hopes that the book would further damage the President and thus his Republican Rival.

All three books above have the opportunity to heavily damage Obama and President Bush, but unlike the Obama campaign, the President's surrogates including intelligence officials were quick to denounce the book and attack the allegations made. It is reasonable to assume that all three books contain a certain level of truth along with a certain level of unfound and overblown allegations. All three books will remain controversial, but the most damaging aspect of all three books will be based upon the quick reaction of those people attacked by the books. So far, the Obama Campaigns limited reaction may cause more damage than the book alone ever would.

Order your copies of The Obama Nation, The Case Against Barack Obama, or The Way Of The World today.

J Brown
August 7th, 2008

Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 212,300 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Obama Throws Non-Combat Military Personnel Under The Bus

I was taking a break from work a short while ago to prepare my next post on Obama's Energy Plan, when I was struck by a particular statement in his New "Green Vet Initiative". Blame it on a rush to put together some form of energy policy or a Freudian slip of the pen, but Obama's "Green Vet Initiative" to me is a condescending attack upon our military personnel and highlights his view of the value of our non-combat or non-war zone heroes.

In the plan available on Obama's Website, Obama states:

"The renewable energy economy is exploding in the United States. In terms of venture capital alone, private investment in the sector topped $2.6 billion dollars in 2007. At the same time, more than 837,000 troops who served in Iraq or Afghanistan are now veterans. As president, Barack Obama will ensure that more of our veterans can enter the new energy economy."

Perhaps someone should inform the Senator that all members who serve our armed service, be it in clerical positions in the Pentagon, Coast Guard personnel rescuing people at sea, or our servicemen & women serving in Korea, Japan, Germany or anywhere around the world will someday be veterans. The roles that these men and women serve in protecting our nation should never be diminished by a campaign that clearly intends on exploiting the service of those currently in the middle east.

Perhaps I'm over-reacting, but for me this is a slap in the face to other 2 million US armed service personnel that are currently serving their country. Yes, Senator Obama, there are currently 2.8 million active and reserved soldiers who will someday all be veterans and deserve that recognition.

J Brown
08/06/2008
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics

Click Here To Access the “Cancel Congress’ Vacation” Energy & Flood-Relief Initiative To Demand President Bush Call A Special Session Of Congress

Democrats & Independents Easily Contact Dem Superdelegates through our 'Last Stand' Stop Obama Email Initiative (Over 250,000 Emails Since July 17th)

Want to contribute to PDOP: Click Here to submit your own article

Obama And His Great Rebate Debate

Those who understand history, know that there is an inherent danger in electing leadership that is intent upon the overuse of populist rhetoric. Any politician can address a crowd, play upon there economic or social woes and promise them brighter days; but true political leadership understands that opportunity is built upon self-reliance and that government intervention in our individual lives typically comes with a high price. Politicians will always pander and they will always use populist issues to further their pursuit of higher office, but there is a fine line that most politicians will not cross.


Barack Obama has taken populist rhetoric and pandering to new heights this election, literally promising ever increasing rebates and credits to solve the economic and social problems that plague each group he talks too. While critics have attacked and outlined the costs of each his new government proposals, few people recognize the extent of his promises, his overall abuse of populist rhetoric, and his overuse of rebates and tax credits as ways of securing votes.


Here is an overview of the promises Obama has made and their associated ANNUAL Costs:

  • Energy Rebate: $500 per individual, applying to 150 million workers - COST: $75 Billion
  • Additional Economic Stimulus Rebate - COST: $20 Billion
  • Individual "Making Work Pay" Tax Credit: $500/individual, applying to 150m COST: $75 Billion
  • Eliminate Tax On Seniors Up To $50,000 Income - Cost: $9.8 Billion
  • Immediate Tax Rebate To Seniors Under $50,000 - Cost: $10 Billion
  • Expand Existing "Savers" Tax Credit - COST $3 Billion
  • Expand Earned Income Tax Credit - Cost $3 Billion
  • Eliminate Federal Employee Windfall Provision - Cost $6 Billion
  • Universal Mortgage Credit: $500 per family making under $50,000 - COST: $5 Billion

  • Extend Child Care Tax Credit to a Refundable Rebate Covering Up To 50% of Child Care Costs - COST: Over $40 Billion
  • Zero To Five Initiative - Cost: $10 Billion

  • Free First Year Of College Up To $4,000 - Cost: $5.8 Billion
  • Expansion Federal Pell Grants - Cost: $7.1 Billion
  • Teaching Service Scholarships - Cost: $1 Billion

  • Immediate Federal Relief Payment To Urban Areas Impacted By Housing Crisis - Cost: $10 Billion
  • Increase Urban Community Development Block Grant - Cost: $1.7 Billion
  • Urban Promise Neighborhoods Progam - Cost $60 Million per year
  • Extension Of Unemployment Benefits - Cost $30 Billion

  • Advanced Manufacturing Fund - Cost $100 Million
  • Disadvantaged Community Business Incubators - Cost $250 Million
  • Increase In Small Business Capital For Minority-Owned Business - Cost $342 Million
  • Affordable Housing Initiative For 'Mixed-Income Neighborhoods - Cost $540 Million
  • 5- E Youth Service Corps - Cost $78 Million

  • Foreclosure Prevention Fund - Cost: $10 Billion
  • Federal Initiative For Mandatory Paid-Leave - Cost $300 Million
  • Trade Adjustment Assistance - Cost $250 Million
  • Urban Poverty Transitional Jobs Program - Cost: $200 Million
  • Increase General Sciences Funding - Cost: $6 Billion

  • Cap & Trade - Cost: $57 Billion
  • Autism Assistance - Cost: $625 Million
  • Health Care Plan - Cost: $65 Billion
  • Reimportation of Prescription Drugs - Cost: $500 Million
  • MedicAid Extension - Cost: 5.6 Billion
  • Medicare Prescription Drug Extension - Cost: $29 Billion

Estimates of Obama's Proposed Spending Have Ranged Up To $1 Trillion Dollars Per Year In New Federal Spending.

That Amount is by no means unimaginable considering that the taxpayer advocacy groups and the Obama campaign have only been able to attain cost estimates for less than half of Obama's proposed programs.

Even if we were to never spend another dime on the War on Terror and were to roll back 100% of the 3 Bush Tax Cuts, the $350-$400 billion in additional revenue would not pay for the combined cost of Obama's 7 most expensive proposals.

Most economists have already stated that an increase in taxes at a time of economic weakness is not likely considering the historically devastating effects of such increases. Additionally, nearly 45% of the current $120 billion annually that is funding the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is earmarked specifically for Afghani operations and foreign aid to these nations. The remaining 55% that is earmarked for Iraqi operations would be eroded by Obama's promises to increase operations in Afghanistan, retain a "security" force in Iraq, increase foreign aid to Iraq & Afghanistan, and an increased US presence in Africa.

Senator Obama has made such an extensive number of campaign promises that he has literally promised some form of entitlement to every individual and industry in the country. It is impractical & naive to believe that Obama's massive spending proposals could lead to anything but a massive ballooning of our federal budget, taxes, and deficit. At the end of the day, if Obama's proposals became reality, the government will balloon to epic proportions, with greater control over our lives and an economic model more socialized than that of any of our European counterparts.

Obama's proposals, however, have shortchanged 2 sectors of our government that are responsible for government's primary purpose of protecting the sovereignty of our nation. Be sure to compare these amounts to those above:


Homeland Security And Law Enforcement - Total Cost Of All New Programs $10 Billion

This $10 Billion lumps together homeland security, border enforcement, disaster assistance, along with additional community development programs, child support enforcement programs, prison-to work programs ($77 Million).

National Defense Increases - Total Cost Of All New Programs $13 Billion

Included is funding for armed services along with Debt Forgiveness To Poor Nations ($197 Million), a $5 Billion Annual Increase In Foreign Aid, A Global Energy Forum, Foreign Energy Assistance Program and INTERNATIONAL FUEL BANK ($50 Million), International Tax Evasion List, Genocide Protection and a Green Technology Transfer Program.


During John F. Kennedy's Administration, 42% of the federal budget was earmarked for Defense spending. Last year, just 17% of our federal budget, including the financing of 2 wars, was earmarked for Defense spending. Today, our Defense spending, when expressed as a