In June sources released information that during his campaign for the State Senate in Illinois, Barack Obama was endorsed by an organization known as the Chicago "New Party". The 'New Party' was a political party established by the Democratic Socialists of America (the DSA) to push forth the socialist principles of the DSA by focusing on winnable elections at a local level and spreading the Socialist movement upwards. The admittedly Socialist Organization experienced a moderate rise in numbers between 1995 and 1999. By 1999, however, the Socialist 'New Party' was essentially defunct after losing a supreme court challenge that ruled the organizations "fusion" reform platform as unconstitutional.
After allegations surfaced in early summer over the 'New Party's' endorsement of Obama, the Obama campaign along with the remnants of the New Party and Democratic Socialists of America claimed that Obama was never a member of either organization. The DSA and 'New Party' then systematically attempted to cover up any ties between Obama and the Socialist Organizations. However, it now appears that Barack Obama was indeed a certified and acknowledged member of the DSA's New Party.
On Tuesday, I discovered a web page that had been scrubbed from the New Party's website. The web page which was published in October 1996, was an internet newsletter update on that years congressional races. Although the web page was deleted from the New Party's website, the non-profit Internet Archive Organization had archived the page.
From the October 1996 Update of the DSA 'New Party':
"New Party members are busy knocking on doors, hammering down lawn signs, and phoning voters to support NP candidates this fall. Here are some of our key races...
Illinois: Three NP-members won Democratic primaries last Spring and face off against Republican opponents on election day: Danny Davis (U.S. House), Barack Obama (State Senate) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary)."
Link To The New Party Update
Beyond the archived web page from the Socialist New Party is the recognition by the "Progressive Populist" magazine in November 1996 that Obama was indeed an acknowledged member of the Socialist Party.
"New Party members and supported candidates won 16 of 23 races, including an at-large race for the Little Rock, Ark., City Council, a seat on the county board for Little Rock and the school board for Prince George's County, Md. Chicago is sending the first New Party member to Congress, as Danny Davis, who ran as a Democrat, won an overwhelming 85% victory. New Party member Barack Obama was uncontested for a State Senate seat from Chicago. "
Link To The November 1996 Progressive Populist Article
The Democratic Socialist Party of America published in their July/August Edition of New Ground 47 Newsletter.
"The Chicago New Party is increasely becoming a viable political organization that can make a different in Chicago politics. It is crucial for a political organization to have a solid infrastructure and visible results in its political program. The New Party has continued to solidify this base...
the NP's '96 Political Program has been enormously successful with 3 of 4 endorsed candidates winning electoral primaries. All four candidates attended the NP membership meeting on April 11th to express their gratitude. Danny Davis, winner in the 7th Congressional District, invited NPers to join his Campaign Steering Committee. Patricia Martin, who won the race for Judge in 7th Subcircuit Court, explained that due to the NP she was able to network and get experienced advice from progressives like Davis. Barack Obama, victor in the 13th State Senate District, encouraged NPers to join in his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration."
Link To DSA Article
Obama's membership within the 'New Party' is disturbing as even Green Party members attacked the DSA and New Party as nothing more than a fringe group. The New Party had hoped to implement Socialist Rule in the United States and was established to counteract the influence of a Democratic Party that they viewed as too moderate and too centered. Now it seems that nearly 10 years after the socialist party fell apart, their strategy of upward growth has reached the White House. Obama's ties to the DSA's New Party is beyond just an association it is outright membership, as clearly defined by the parties August 1996 newsletter, in an outright Socialist organization.
DIGG IT: http://digg.com/politics/Archives_confirm_Barack_Obama_belonged_to_socialist_party
From Our Friends At American Thinker: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/10/archives_prove_obama_was_a_new.html
J Brown
October 8th, 2008
Click Here To Access Over 600 Free Career and Professional Trade Publications.No Credit Card, No Payments, No Surveys, No Strings - Special Offer For Our Readers. Publications include Inc., CFO Magazine, Google White Pages, The Economist and hundreds more.
Please be sure to vote on this article at Real Clear Politics
Be Sure To Visit Our Friday Coffee Break Section For Reader Offers
I urge everyone to send this story in to Drudge, Politico and any other news source you're familiar with. This story could be the beginning of the end for Obama's campaign.
ReplyDeleteI suppose Sen. Joe McCarthy is alive and well. Really, are we going to start witch-hunting again in this country? Even if true, this bit of information has zero bearing on Senator Obama's current political viewpoints, which focus on consensus building and understanding the views of others. Stick to the issues this country faces. There's more than enough mud that could be dug up about Sen. McCain which would "effectively end his campaign."
ReplyDeleteThis means only one of two things: (1) Obama was and is a socialist; or (2) Obama has no political conviction whatsoever and merely says what he thinks will get him elected. Either you have principles or you don't, but seldom do they change. Besides, any rational examination of his policies and statements reveals #1 is true.
ReplyDeleteI commend you for your research.
ReplyDeleteThis is proof of Obamas time line on his affiliations with those who would take down our Free Republic.
The comment by anonymous is typical liberal smokescreen 'nothing to see here ... move along.' instead of addressing the issue.
ReplyDeleteDave H is correct ... either obama is/was a socialist or he will say anything to get into office. either way, he is BAD for America. There is just way too much evidence that obama is part of the far-left/socialists that intend to tear this country apart bit by bit.
We the people must stop this man from tearing our country apart.
And this is an issue..why? Whats so bad about socialism? I personally enjoy social democracy myself and the potential of it. It works for sweden, canada and many others!
ReplyDeleteGet a life people.
Get it out to all of them. More pieces of the puzzle, more H20 for the rolling snowball about Barack Obama's Marxism.
ReplyDeleteAlso, see these two pages:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=S8QcpdUtxNQ
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_the_strategy.html
Yes Anon,
ReplyDeletePeople enjoy socialism, thats why they depend upon our economic and military strength. Oh by the way, it didn't work out so well for Germany 70 years ago, or for that matter Venezuala today.
"What's so bad about socialism?" Where do I start? Ok look at Post Soviet Collapse Eastern Europe. Loot at the Former East Germany's Economy. Loot and North Korea. Socialism turns people into SLAVES. You do what the state says, work for the states wages and go to the state schools and follow the state's party line or YOU DON'T EAT. Hello! Socialism DOES NOT WORK, just look at any socialist country then compare it to the US, there IS no comparison, even the poorest people here have a TV, running water and a frikken air conditioner. The average person in a Socialist state just barely has enough to eat and no reason at all to try and make his/her life better. Why? Because the state isn't interested in what you as an individual can do. It’s interested in you ONLY as a battery feeding the continued power of the State and Government. Man, some people are just stuck on Stupid. See, this is what we get for allowing Liberals to run our schools and colleges, they are NOT teaching HISTORY or anything else that does not fit their agenda. Its sick.
ReplyDeleteThe problem is not so much that Barack Obama is/was a socialist, it's the cover-up.
ReplyDelete"What's the problem with Obama's membership in a radical socialist party?" ask his defenders. Why, none, if you happen to be a radical socialist.
ReplyDeleteIf you're among the vast majority of Americans who aren't, however, his membership in this group and his willingness to lie repeatedly to hide it constitutes a glaring red flag.
Well done - There are two other articles on this same line - one at No Quarter, one at American Thinker - Everyone please get this info out. Voters have a right to know and unlike the Obamabot troll posts - they will care very much.
ReplyDeleteThis confirms what we have known all along. Time for Barry to move in with cousin Odinga.
So Anonymous likes socialism.I like National Socialism,it worked well for Germany until those pesky corpses showed up.
ReplyDeleteA search of the Internet Archive Organization using "New Party" and 1996 and "New Party" and Obama failed to turn up the cited quote.
ReplyDeleteAny suggestions?
Yes,
ReplyDeleteClick on the link under the quote.
Did that. Didn't work. It links to their index page.
ReplyDeleteNever mind. All fixed now:)
ReplyDeleteSo Barack Obama has socialist views.
ReplyDeleteSo what?
OK, the first link takes me to an innocuous web page where I can try to search for "obama new party". I get no helpful hits. The rest of the article is extremely interesting. Too many people in this country are ready for socialism. If Obama wins this election and gets more than 50% of the vote, we are doomed as a society. That means over half of us are stupid enough to vote for a socialist megalomaniac who, with a majority democRAT congress, will rule this country forever. Wake up, Americans. This is a bad, bad, bad man, controlled by other bad, bad, bad "men", like Bill Ayers. How stupid do you have to be to vote for this charlatan?
ReplyDeleteAnonymous, if you like socialism, then move to a Socialist country! This is NOT what the founding fathers envisioned. The U.S. is NOT a socialist country and to tell you the truth, it is a formula for disincentive, and lack of opportunity.
ReplyDeleteThe financial bailout has made this into a socialist country. Obama was early to the game, that's all.
ReplyDeleteAnon at 2:28
ReplyDeleteKeep trying, I jsut cleared my cache and the link worked fine, the page may just be overloaded, but I doubt it. Anyways, someone had the same problem a couple hours ago and finally resolved it
"TC said... So Barack Obama has socialist views. So what?"
ReplyDeleteGood question. Why would Obama and the New Party go to so much trouble to hide the truth?
Come on, Obama, be loud! Be proud! Stop being so modest and trying to hide it. Proclaim your socialist agenda to the whole country!!!
If Palin can get extraordinary attention drawn to her husband's flirtations with the Alaskan Independence Party, this should be fair game too.
ReplyDeleteObama needs to be dragged out of the closet! People need to know of his campaigning for the ethnic cleanser of Kenya, Odinga!
ReplyDeleteTo Anonymous etc., I've left Europe and moved to New York to escape socialism and live in a capitalist democracy, a country based on individual freedom and responsibility. Socialism = communism = fascism. Orwell understood it. That's what 1984 was about.
ReplyDeleteYes, the bailout was a disaster, moving America half-way to socialism. Obama will finish the job and end the American experiment as a beacon of freedom in the world. Obama is part of the forces ushering a new dark age under islam and socialism.
Digg it here:
ReplyDeletehttp://digg.com/politics/Archives_confirm_Barack_Obama_belonged_to_socialist_party
Let's Digg this story to the top!
And this is an issue..why? Whats so bad about socialism?
ReplyDeletePlease keep saying this for the next 27 days. Thanks in advance.
It is such an outrage that false stories about Sarah Palin are reported as fact and the media will not investigate or report - once informed - any truth about Barack Hussein Obama.
ReplyDelete"Education is the motor force for revolution"
ReplyDeleteBill Ayers
Venezuela 2006
Barack Hussein Obama is the most extreme candidate for president in our history. His fundamental beliefs are hidden from view, as are his associations and alliances with multiple others, who openly state that this country must be remade by socialism (Communism). Barry Hussein collaborated on a group which spent $147,000,000 to "reform Chicago schools". The reforms? It's unknown, because the records of the Annenburg Challenge are "unavailable"- in the sense of providing information about their history. Hopwever, an IBD Editoral 10/07/2008, might help you understand why-
IBD Editoral 10-07-2008
An idea of what Ayers has in mind for America's schools was provided in his own words not 40 years ago when Obama was eight years old, but less than two years ago in November 2006 at the World Education Forum in Caracas hosted by dictator Hugo Chavez.
With Chavez at his side, Ayers voiced his support for "the political educational reforms under way here in Venezuela under the leadership of President Chavez. We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution. . . . I look forward to seeing how . . . all of you continue to overcome the failures of capitalist education as you seek to create something truly new and deeply humane."
Ayers told the great humanitarian Chavez: "Teaching invites transformations, it urges revolutions large and small. La educacion es revolucion." It is that form of socialist revolution that Ayers, and Obama, have worked to bring to America.
Obama's Real Problem With Ayers
IBD Editoral 10-07-2008
To find out now that he was a member of a purely socialist organization in the 90's which helped him get elected to the IL senate fits exactly. The Annenburg Challenge has another mystery-Why would an organization award Barry Hussein the powerful position of deciding who got money from the Anneburg foundation-He was a 33 year old lawyer-That's it-Nothing to qualify him for such a position. But, that's how it works in Chicago-Gotta pay as you go. The entire press and all his followers have been outright duped completely. For the NYT to come out and say that "there is no reason to suspect BO had a relationship with Bill Ayers" is absurd and at once refutes any logic. Bill Ayers got the grant-BO wrote the checks. C'mon.
Good Stuff! Obama Uber Alles!
ReplyDeleteThanks so much for digging this up. And to mainstream media that didn't I say find another line of work.
ReplyDeleteI'd like more information on exactly how this was 'found' since I seemingly cant get to it coming through archive.orgs front page and only from 'your' link.
ReplyDeleteSo what exactly does this 'prove' except that his name appears on the given web page.
Could the New Party have been trying to associate themselves with Mr. Obama? I don't know.
It's hardly a smoking gun, and will probably only serve as' proof' to the easily swayed.
"Keyword searching is not currently supported" by the Wayback Machine. So if you start at their index page you have to enter the URL for the New Party web site, and then look for the content. Or just click on the provided links. If you don't trust them, well try traceroute!
ReplyDeleteThis fills in the blanks between two links that have been in play for a while. The first is the Ayers/Obama connection. In 1996, socialist terrorist Ayers, his weatherwoman-socialist wife, and (we now know) the socialist front New Party pushed Obama for state senate. That same year, Obama was selected by Ayers and his CAC collaborative to run the CAC grant recipient. That is either a big coincidence or evidence that Obama and Ayers are more than casual acquaintances.
ReplyDeleteThe second is Obama's strong affinity with far-left socialist political policies. Without that strong affinity, he never would have accepted the endorsement of the New Party, nor would he have invited its members to take his training courses funded by (we now know) ACORN.
This is not a pretty picture for a future President of the US. While it will appeal to the ANSWER nutjobs (some of whom anonymously post here), it will turn off those OH, PA, TN, CO, VA, FL voters who will simply not vote for a socialist.
The Obama troops know this, and will stop at nothing to keep this information from wide distribution.
They well know how toxic this is even if some of the astroturfing posters here would have you believe they don't.
Congratulations on your investigative work. You may have just saved the country.
ReplyDeleteMore Sources + How They Planned On Hijacking The Democratic Party Coming At Midnight Eastern.
ReplyDelete"Socialism = communism = fascism. Orwell understood it. That's what 1984 was about."
ReplyDeleteFirst off, Orwell was a socialist, he fought with the socialist in the Spanish Civil War. Second, 1984 isn't about how socialism turns to fascism, but rather how people in power can manipulate the human thought process to stay in power (doublethink).
Being endorsed by a person or a group does not mean that you are part of that group nor agree with what every person in that group thinks!
ReplyDeleteIt's time for a change around here...clearly the crazy republican ways haven't worked...look at our country, it is disgusting!!
Genius Anon,
ReplyDeleteHE WAS A MEMBER NOT JUST ENDORSED!!!!!!!!
MEMMMMBBBBERRRRR!
To the "crazy" version of anonymous who likes socialism......
ReplyDeleteAsk the Jewish community how well socialism worked for them about 60+ year ago....
socialism and communism are not the same thing!!!!!
ReplyDeleteAnd where is this alleged proof that he was a member??
ReplyDeleteWhen the One declared war on the Capitalists,
ReplyDeleteI sent money to ACORN & MoveOn.org;
War is Peace.
When the One called on us to shout down his critics,
I followed his commands blindly;
Freedom is Slavery.
When the One promised to meet with America’s enemies (without preconditions),
I was proud of my country for the first time in my life;
Ignorance is Strength.
When the One came for me,
it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished;
I loved Big Brother.
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Bill S.
Good work, but you could have saved a lot of trouble checking out these guys' story posted 5 months ago.
ReplyDeletehttp://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/05/30/obamas-radical-political-alliances/
Nonetheless, I'm running with it at my blog. God's work. That's what you're doing.
Anonymous says are we starting a witch hunt.
ReplyDeleteNo there are lots of witches that are alive and well in Obama's camp. We could fill a page with Obama's questionable associations.
Name one associate of John McCain's that is a known Domestic TERRORIST and stands up an says he's proud that he bombed our country and only wishes he could have done more. It isnow teaching this hate and being paid with our tax dollars.
Acorn is now under investigation in 10 states for fraud and guess who has a close relationship with them. Obomba
Cap't.
ReplyDeleteThe story mentions the ties and endorsement, these allegations were heavily reported in June by Red State and Human Events as referenced above. The endorsement stories first surfaced over a year ago.
But there is a major difference between an endorsement and actual evidence that Obama was a recognized member or the organization.
This anti-Obama crap is just pathetic. Don't you people have any honest work to do? You should be ashamed and embarrassed.
ReplyDeleteJ. Brown, check the story at No Quarter about Obama's attendance at these meetings. I don't put too much stock in No Quarter's reporting, they have led me astray more than once, but it makes a nice addition to your story. None of this surprises me, but it's nice you found the goods and made them public. For those who care to know, it means a lot.
ReplyDeleteDon't you know that asking questions about Obama's past is raaaaccisstt?!
ReplyDeleteCap't,
ReplyDeleteThe whole 'whitey' debacle really damaged the credibility on the site. But, that article is sound as far as sources go.
The alleged "smoking gun" cited here states Danny Davis was a member as well, which is just plain fiction. Danny Davis has some colorful, to be charitable, connections. One of these was/is the Rev. Sun Myung Moon, who isn't exactly known to truck with socialists. This whole article is either a knowing distortion promulgated by the desperate, or an unwitting distortion promulgated by the desperate. How about discussing some actual issues for a change?
ReplyDeleteActually Obamabot,
ReplyDeleteThe New Party Website listed Davis as a founding party builder of the organization. The DSA and other organizations have previously recognized his membership. Nice try!
For the brain dead that can't figure out how to click on the link provided in the article, here's another one:
ReplyDeletehttp://web.archive.org/web/20001017221518/www.newparty.org/elecsuc.html
Wow, this is weird. Last night I found the same material by using Google's temporary 10 year anniversary search. If you go to google's site, then click on 'try a search from our early days', you can do a search of just those things from 10 years ago and earlier. Search 'Obama' and 'New Party' and there you go! Search 'Wright' and 'Ayers' or 'health care' and you find other uncomfortable things...
ReplyDeletenew post up
ReplyDeleteOK "ironyisoverrated", how about we discuss the issue of how Obama is going to grow the economy and still implement his "socialist" public welfare policies? You go to any city, state, or municipality and see how they grow their economy and attract business by cutting or in some cases eliminating corporate tax rates and then tell me how Obama is going to grow the national economy implementing policies that are in direct contrast to those local philosophies. He's made no bones about his intent to implement punitive tax policies on businesses and other individuals with a demonstrated capacity to create wealth, and correspondingly (as it is fundamentally obvious to anyone who isn't hypnotized by hope), a demonstrated capacity to create jobs and therefore national wealth. America already has the second highest corporate tax rate in the world. You think it's just a coincidence that business keep relocating overseas? Obama, and you apparently, fail to understand that corporations, those entities that employ us and create our national wealth, are nationless and borderless and will move to those nations where they can make a profit. Or perhaps Obama does understand that dynamic and figures that the more business he can run off the easier it will be for him to centralize the American economy. Which, if you're paying attention, is socialism. See how that comes full circle? Wake up you fu*ktard cock monkey. Obama wants to eat your children!
ReplyDeleteThere an interesting intersection between the party members named on this page - http://web.archive.org/web/19961112083726/www.newparty.org/home_links.html - and Obama. Several of them have written multiple editorials about Obama in the current race. Coincidence? I doubt it. They are rooting for their guy.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteHere's an article that claims that Ayers was also a New Party member. No sources cited, however.
ReplyDeletehttp://contributors.blogsome.com/2008/10/09/god-bless-you-marion-valentine/
Very informative!! Here are comments I have posted at other sites:
ReplyDeleteI think responsible Americans will have educated themselves by election time and elect Mr. McCain. Senator McCain has a voting record we can research to know more about him.
To me, Mr. Obama is still an unknown and, as president with the support of a democratic congress, I fear we will become a socialist state. Too, I worry about the political bent of any supreme court justice he is likely to appoint. Finally, I think President Obama and his acquaintances will try to destroy our country from within.
http://www.populist.com/11.96.Edit.html
ReplyDelete"New Party member Barack Obama was uncontested for a State Senate seat from Chicago."
The problem here is that the young voters in the obama camp have no clue what this means. They think, oh socialism is good because the people get the help they need. I am afraid the only answer would be to let them experience it. But maybe they will understand that a government so over bloated is unable to handle socialism. Socialism means government will have their hands in everything you do, where you work, how much pay you are allowed to keep (not much), what you eat, where you shop. What you really want is less government in your life. ESPECIALLY one that is as ineffective as this one.
ReplyDeleteryan ch. The polls are tightening. What do you have to say about that, my friend?
ReplyDeleteSean,
ReplyDeleteDo not try posting garbage from Wikipedia. Get a clue about what socialism really is. You dont want it, I promise you that one.
If that does not bother you, remember, if your guy happens to get elected, and he ruins this great country, you and the other democrats will be blamed. Just as hatefully as you are blaming Bush, but this time it will be true.
Here is another thought. Our income has the potential to increase this year or the next. I am not saying we are close to $250k, but we will make sure that we are not anywhere close to making that. You know why? Cause your going to keep allot more of your money if you make $249,999. Allot of other people like me are going to do the very same thing. THAT IS CALLED STUMPING THE ECONOMY, NOT GROWING IT.
ReplyDeleteWhich straw would that be? The Ayers straw, the Rezco straw, the acorn straw, the voter fraud straw, the questionable finances straw, the socialism straw, there are so many and more that you could grasp a handful of straws and we all end up losing.
ReplyDeleteThe evidence is damning and beyond a resonable doubt that any jury in this land would find Obama guilty.
And THIS man is a heartbeat away from being the leader of our country?! Wake up people, stand up and save our country.
Dave,
ReplyDeleteWhat do you care, and why are you here? You are apparently canadian.
Unless you are involved in voter fraud and illegally registered to vote where you should not be.
Well at least we can check your name and ip address when all the lawsuits for illegal voter fraud comes out.
anon, I see nothing there that trumps the horrid associations of obama.
ReplyDeleteOne more thing that makes your entire claim look stupid, McCain was born on a military base. He is a U.S. citizen. Go back to school and get your facts straight.
hey jules, since when did the US have the right to dictate immigration laws of other countries? US base or not, he is a citizen of Panama first, then a citizen of US. That is basic immigration law dumdum.
ReplyDeleteAhhh Yes the nyt is such the "fair and accurate" reporting source. I would not believe them if they tried to convince me the sky was blue. THAT's how fair and balanced they are.
ReplyDeletePeople, You are slaves because they tax your pay checks and you can barely get by.
ReplyDeletePeople, you are slaves because the bankers are your masters, and interest keeps you tied despite your race or your gender.
People, We are forced to look at differences and unite through them instead of similarities. BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELIVISION is RACIST and used to continue white and black violence or tension.
People, UNITE with your HUMAN VOICE And YOUR INTELLIGENCE, YOUR SOULS, UNITE through similarities, and UNDERSTAND each others differences.
People, our dollar means nothing, it is an idea that is taxed by interest by the Federal Reserve that owns the world.
People, there is nothing that you can do but to wait, but I must despite the dangers urge that you become educated about these things.
People, Vote for the least of two evils- even though your vote DOES NOT COUNT, the people's vote IS NULL. The electoral college says who stays and who goes. Kerry and Gore were the least of two evils, guess who won...President Bush.
People, NOW McCain is the least of two evils...but I fear that he might not win. It is too bad that those who follow the constitution and warn of the dangers of the Militia Act and the Patriot Act do not and will never become president.
It was a U.S. military base.
ReplyDeleteAre you going to tell me all the children born on U.S. military bases are not citizens? Go home you wacko.
anon,
ReplyDeleteWell you say why is it OK for McCain to run for president since he was born on a military base? It OK and one is recognized a naturalize citizen if one is born on a military base and both parents are US citizens. The First Congress, on March 26, 1790, approved an act that declared, "The children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond sea, or outside the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural-born citizens of the United States." The key word is citizens, both parents must be citizens, not just one. McCain is a natural born citizen because both his parents were US citizens when he was born at a military facility outside the United States.
Satisfied?
Does anyone realize what CEO's of these major corporations are doing with this government aid money?
ReplyDeleteThey are taking vacations.
Selling their business and pocketing some of it.
If anyone has any other sources that find this true please post it, if anyone has sources that refute it do so as well.
We must be open minded
We must QUESTION EVERYTHING
We must question motives
We must not be led blindly by either party.
Research, research, research. It could be the thing that saves you.
chad, is that why the polls are tightening up?
ReplyDeleteChad,
ReplyDeleteYou are definately a follower. You are throwing cliches "real issues" and all of that mumbo jumbo. Have you heard either candidate speak about real issues in depth and with detail?
They don't know what the details of their plans are because of the financial problems and other things. They are both being GENERAl so they don't lose party support or accidentally go out on a limb and lose public support.
Give us proof buddy. Give us proof why Obama is NOT a DANGER to the U.S.
McCain fought for this country, do you think he will let it go to the dogs?
Know your facts man, and realize that integrity and responsibility as well as character define a good leader. Do we want someone who based on the Muslim faith CAN lie and CAN cheat as it is JUSTIFIED in the Quran?
Read the Quran, you will realize that a muslim can lie to someone else and say that they are christian as long as inside their hearts they know that they are muslim, so that they can do what they need to do.
Is obama supporting his family for the fun of it, for family sake?
WE have heard about many family fueds, disagreements becoming better than other family members which included AVOIDING them, and CALLING out their lies!
If only he were a true christian...
well matt, with the economics in such turmoil, do you think that burdening an already overburdened government is going to help. They obviously cannot be trusted to deal with our money, but you want to entrust them with our health care?
ReplyDeleteObama has never even balanced a budjet in his life, you think he can lead us out of this hole?
I think not.
Matt,
ReplyDeleteI am only hoping that Obama is what he says he is.
I am only hoping that McCain is the maverick that he says he is.
To tell you the honest truth I can't commit to liking either of them, and I only hope that as the people blindly followed Bush, that they don't blindly follow Obama because of his great way of speaking or because of his youth or politeness.
Do you understand my concerns?
As everyone made a double mistake with Bush, I was Against him, the war, the bills and ideas. Bush is a joke.
It is just that...Obama and McCain both say they are something and I just hope that whichever one wins is the one telling the truth.
Not exciting or evil...just like Bush isn't funny or charming.
Bush is stupid and inconsiderate.
I am crossing my fingers that Obama isn't too friendly with our enemies or too excited about any more advances at the North American Trade Union...
That is all, from a registered democrat...I just want someone who isn't part of any corruption.
McCain fought for this country, do you think he will let it go to the dogs?
ReplyDeleteYES I DO!!!
Yup I was a democrat too. I voted for clinton, and he did nothing he said he would do AND he got us into 911 by ignoring bin laden when he could have captured him.
ReplyDeleteI did not vote for bush, in fact I did not vote for anyone.
Now, we have clintonII. I am not going through that again.
We have a Mavrick team with Regan principals that CAN fix this government. There is no question here. An unexperienced president with too many terrorist ties both domestic and abroad, or the strong team leaders we have with McCain/Palin.
The choice is clear. Do you want to heal our country or tear it apart.?
Reagan came to the white house with some simple ideas but they weren't simple-minded ideas. These were ideas to cut tax rates. At that time in the United States we had a 70 percent top tax rate. That was really discouraging economic growth. The second big problem that we had in the economy was raging inflation. You know, when Reagan entered office the inflation rate was 14 percent. I think that more than anything probably cost Jimmy Carter the election. And the third thing was Reagan promised to rebuild the military to fight the evil empire and to try to bring the Cold War to an end victoriously.
ReplyDeleteI think what made Ronald Reagan such a great president, in my opinion, was that he came in with these three objectives and he was able to accomplish them all in eight years. Eight years after President Reagan had been elected the Berlin Wall had just about come down, and I think it was pushed down by Reaganomics and Reagan's military policies. The inflation rate had come down very dramatically and taxes had.
And so Reagan was able to ask Americans twice, are you better off today than you were four years ago? And both times Americans resoundingly said, yes, we're a lot better off.
Deception is great...
ReplyDeleteThe threat is real...even if it wasn't before.
Michael Moore would perhaps be right that there was an invisible massive threat created...if he said that 60 or so years ago.
"Change Change Change" is the chant of someone who is already brain washed my friend.
And of someone who CANNOT step back AND INVESTIGATE their own candidate.
Also...Chad I don't think that you have been reading my comments correctly, I am NOT BIASED.
First of all I am commenting concerns of the good the bad the ugly on both candidates.
Secondly YOU ARE BIASED FOR YOUR OWN FAVORITE CANDIDATE...What a dork. I don't think you understand what the word "biased" means..so don't use it.
Your eyes and ears are closed to other sources of information about Obama...the media is being payed to be slanted towards him CNN FOX...all of them.
I am weak at the knees.....because you think that I am "afraid of change", and that you think that I am a loony.
Loony kind of sounds like loopy, and similar to a record that skips all I hear out of obama and obama supporters is "Change" but I don't see the supporting details of how that is to happen.
By narrowing your candidate to what is only important to you is a very closed minded thing to do. You miss the big picture my friend.
I did not agree to the war, but we are there, I did not approve of Bush but we are there.
Now that there is a real threat with children being brainwashed into believing that death brings them a certificate to heaven on children networks...is proof that they are the future terrorists of the world.
It begins with education, and because Bill Clinton ignored threats...Osama bin laden was able to spread his wahabi tribe radicalism all over the middle east.
I doubt that the twin towers fell from one hit by two air planes...because there are witnesses to explosions that could have been planted by muslim insiders.
Trust that Britian is DEALING with their growing muslim population
Trust that Australia is DEALING with their growing muslim population
TRUST that ANYWHERE that used to be christian populated is DEALING with a growing Muslim population.
Say no to Sharia law
Say no to Gun bans
Say no to leaving Iraq helpless
Obama is only going to start a new war before iraq is ready to hold its own...
Obama wants to go after Pakistan
before iraqi citizens are safe and the iraqi government can hold its own
We invaded their country so we should do all of these things to make sure that iraq can hold its own...we should pay more attention to afghanistan.
Has either candidate been specific?
Which one is the safest?
Why is it with each passing president we continue to lose rights?
Give me reasons WHY either candidate is GOOD or BETTER OVERALL!
You betcha I am one sided. When I could not keep count of all the corrupt associations that obama had, I had no choice but to vote against an inexperienced man with terrorist connections that would run our country into the ground.
ReplyDeleteIf you are so independant why do you seem to drool at the site of obama kool aid?
Steve, are you in jail? Your blog seems to suggest that. I thought people in jail could not vote. Unless you are also invloved in voter fraud.
ReplyDeleteAnon, I dont care what your little poll says. I am going to excercise my right to vote. It is the socialist that tries to influence us not to vote, right comrad?
I think you've said it Patrick Meighan.
ReplyDeleteI don't think people see the big picture.
A horse and pony show...
A television screen that is an expert at mind control.
Those experiments with electricity and a button....how far will a person follow the masses or what they believe are the masses decision.
When will they see that Democrats and Republicans are one in the same and chip away at our constitution in different ways.
I would like for people to JUST say that they understand my concerns...as a middle eastern american who was almost raped by a muslim male visiting the dead sea....
I would like for them to understand where my concerns stem from.
I would like for the people to understand their constitution..
I would like for the people to understand how their government works...
I would like for the people to understand how media, how government, and how the world HAS created a monster.
I pray that they do research and if they don't agree, that they just understand.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete(is Anon 1)
ReplyDeleteOf course you can excercise the right to vote...
But we are a republic...
by voting in a president using the electoral system corruption is greater with less people to corrupt.
The people are just involved in a popularity contest...
Understand my concerns yet?
anon, if you do not believe in voting why are you here?
ReplyDeleteOh...I am sorry... I blew your cover. You are trying to get people to stay home on election day.
I wil vote until some socialist tries to pull out my registration slip out of my cold dead hand.
Isn't it age discrimination against anyone over 60 when the democratic campaign releases negative attacks about McCains health?
ReplyDeleteDo you notice how the media eats that up and uses "a heart beat away" as their motto for talking about Palin...
Of course if a similar disciminating element were introduced about Obamas race or religion everyone would be shooting it down and not taking a closer look.
CNN investigated the madraci school that obama went to as it IS TODAY....Not how it WAS when obama went to school.
The media is rediculous..
I would rather read their individual speaches rather than watch it, and rather read the debates instead of watching it first.
Politicaljules....
ReplyDeleteI am not against voting...I encourage it because it would show a contrast between what the people really wanted and what the ones who have the power to elect a president have chosen.
That is all...
I am not a socialist, I would like to see a true constituationally motivated candidate.
My concern is getting stuck with the wrong person...again but not by the peoples choice.
You see?
$140,000 is a big bet if you're a working stiff, but there are people in Vegas and in other casinos around the world RIGHT THIS SECOND losing ten TIMES that amount on one hand of cards - and not batting an eye about it, either.
ReplyDeleteThere are parallel social worlds operating right next to the more mundane ones that most of us live in around the globe. People who can and do wager this kind of money are less common than those who can't don't, but there are MANY of them.
Steve, are you in jail? Your blog seems to suggest that.
ReplyDeleteWhy does it suggest that?
I might be getting confused with other anonymous people.
ReplyDeleteAnon 1-and middle eastern-and using the word "understand"-and "If only he were a true christian" -was me.
We all have to pray that things do not get worse, and I hope this decline in gas prices isn't just to make people happy before the elections...
Has anyone heard about the active unit of army (not national gaurd or coast gaurd), but an active unit of army deployed to the "homeland" and being trained for riots, crowd control, door to door gun removal, "police type work", and practicing removal and drills for "dirty bombs".
The government obviously thinks this situation is going to get worse......to soon enforce the militia act.
This was briefly in the news, you can also find other articles about it and it has been confirmed by someone that I know who was in that unit deported to "homeland" (Georgia)
Fasten your seat belts.....the ride might get rougher. : (
quite frankly, as disturbing as obama's relationship with william ayers (and his charming wife, who once saluted charles manson's mass murder, among other things..) is the fact that william ayers finds obama acceptable too. why would a guy who thinks the US is a fascist dictatorship want to see barack obama elected to political office to the extent that he hosts the guy's campaign launch party at his house? perhaps its because he knows obama agrees with him on most/all issues? i mean, we all tend to support politicians who agree with us. why does ayers, a radical bomb-throwing militant leftist, like obama so much?
ReplyDeleteAlls ya need to do is get this on wikipedia.
ReplyDeleteCome on.
it is LUDICROUS to suggest that this piece of non-information could be the "beginning of the end" of anything.
ReplyDeleteand WHY are you people using Socialism as if it's a dirty word?! Sweden is a 'free' country too, and one that enjoys much higher standards of living and economic equality than the US.
this 'article' is nonsense, nonsense, nonsense.
I'm tellin ya: get it on wikipedia! That's if those tree-hugging hippie socialist latte sipping "editors" at wiki don't censure you first.
ReplyDeleteNo seriously, you guys are on to something here! What are you waiting for?
Someone actually posted on Wiki a couple times yesterday, but nutroots are trying best to quash the story. Everytime, someone posts on wiki, someone else almost immediately edits it. There also trying to bury any story on reddit or digg.
ReplyDeleteThese items show that Obama was apparently a member of the New Party, but they don't prove that the New Party was a socialist party. They also don't show that Obama was a member of the Democratic Socialists of America. It also doesn't prove that the DSA established the New Party.
ReplyDeleteLooking at the "New Ground 47" newsletter, there were two separate entries about the New Party. The one quoted above mentions that the Chicago New Party had been around since at least January 1995. But a separate entry ("Other DSA News") mentions that the Chicago DSA voted in June 1996 to explore affiliation with the New Party.
If the DSA had founded the New Party they wouldn't have needed to vote on whether to "explore" affiliation with them.
Also, the "Progressive Populist" article refers to Obama as a "New Party member." Yet this post says that it was recognition that "Obama was indeed an acknowledged member of the Socialist Party."
ReplyDeleteThe Socialist Party and the New Party are not the same organization.
If you really think about it and reflect on the facts...Sen Joe McCarthy was RIGHT! Those who still attempt to discredit his motivations and accomplishments are foolish and blind. History has proven him right and just.
ReplyDeleteNow, if he were only here today. While his critics would be vocal, at least he would be noticed!
And this story wouldn't die in the MSM..
It is well documented that the New Party was founded by leadership of the DSA. to operate under a bottom-up approach to furthering the Socialist Movement. The DSA in itself is a political organization, not a political party. Nice Try!
ReplyDeleteSocialism
ReplyDelete"(in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles."
Have you also seen New Ground 45:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.chicagodsa.org/ngarchive/ng45.html
What would bother me is any kind of cover-up. I would feel much more comfortable if he addressed it publicly and it was dealt with overtly.
ReplyDeleteOther than that, it's not that big of a deal. Just as the liberals went on that GWB was going to destroy the world by launching nukes at everyone and starting WWIII, the conservatives are going to complain that BO would turn the US into a Communist State. The former didn't happen when GWB was elected and the latter wouldn't happen if BO was elected.
"Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteTo the "crazy" version of anonymous who likes socialism......
Ask the Jewish community how well socialism worked for them about 60+ year ago...."
The current state of Israel is very socialist.
The have
Universal health Care
Mandatory Military service.
Socialism is not Fascism or Communism.
http://www.chicagodsa.org/ngarchive/ng116.html (Ayers)
ReplyDeletehttp://www.chicagodsa.org/ngarchive/ng117.html (Obama)
http://www.chicagodsa.org/ngarchive/ng45.html (Obama)
http://www.chicagodsa.org/ngarchive/ng69.html (Obama)
source: Our mission is to establish democratic socialism as a political force in the United States and around the world by training and mobilizing socialist activists to participate in a vibrant and diverse socialist organization at both the local and the national level. DSA both educates the public about democratic socialist values and policies and builds progressive coalitions to win victories that move the U.S. and the world toward social democracy. In the near term, democratic socialists struggle for reforms that shift power and resources away from corporate elites and put them in the hands of ordinary citizens. In the long term, democratic socialists fight for a world in which all people share equally in the governing of the economic, political and cultural institutions and relationships that shape their lives.
Chicago DSA
http://www.chicagodsa.org/index.html
There might be other references in their archives. BA
By the way you are missing the larger picture here. There is still fusion today. Alive and well in New York State. And they have a party.....Working Families Party...
ReplyDeleteAnd they are endorsing Obama....connect the dots...if you go to the New Party website hit the Working Families Party link. They are one and the same! The Socialist Party is not gone and they have endorsed Obama. I wasn't going to expose this but it will eventually come....Hillary Clinton used them to get elected Senator in New York State....now you know the rest of the story and why she had to stump for Obama.
Read more at:
http://msplaceddemocrat.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/obamas-ties-to-a-socialist-party/
The whole story is there!
is this surprising? Even in his book "Dreams from my father", Barack talks about attending the Socialist Conferences in his college. The media ignores it. The American people ignore it, McCain ignores it. The next president of the United States will be Obama, the most radical left-wing socialist this country has ever known. I hope this country survives. Read my blog on what I thought of the debate.
ReplyDeleteMark
http://mark24609.blogspot.com/
"The next president of the United States will be Obama, the most radical left-wing socialist this country has ever known. I hope this country survives."
ReplyDeleteSee what I meant earlier about the conservatives complaining that he would turn the US into a Communist State?
Thanks Mark, you made my day. ^^
too bad the media wall will prevent any of this from being seen by voters, being presented only by the `vast right wing conspiracy'
ReplyDeleteOnce elected the ministry of truth will wash all this away so they'll be nothing further toworry about.
So Barack Hussein Obama is a commie. Big deal.
ReplyDeleteHe's also a cigarette fiend. So what?
And he's in bed with Acorn and the "make government-backed loans to people with no income" crowd? How does that hurt me?
Most liberal member of the Senate? Big whoop.
Terrorist-hugger? Says you.
Follower of a wacky black militant preacher? Well, so's his wife.
Wants to hike taxes and turn Social Security into a welfare program? So did Al Gore.
You people get all het up about nothin...
Soooo, what's the point?
ReplyDeleteIt would be interesting to find out if Ayers also had any affiliation with the New Party.
ReplyDeleteMcCain according to an internet article is a member of an affiliated Nazi organization
ReplyDeleteThis is from a Daily Kos article which has no credibility.
Palin is a known member of a Secession group.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/sliming_palin.html
McCain and Palin are adulterers. McCain's wife is a drug addict. McCain is a wife beater.
These are all Kos and Moveon articles, which essentially means they're worthless.
Why do so many people confuse socialist with communist and marxist; that's like confusing freckles with genital warts (cancerous genital warts).
Not at all. You forgot, Cuba, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, and many others. Someone who loves socialist values, should love to move to any of these nations where they policies they want to push are already in practice.
It needs to be understood, that socialism promises wonderful utopian things, but when it's put into practice in reality, it never delivers. It is the "As Seen On TV" of governmental forms.
Full employment, free health care, free tuition, free retirement, free housing, free job security, etc.
If it sounds to good to be true, that's because it is.
Mark Post said...
ReplyDeleteI urge everyone to send this story in to Drudge, Politico and any other news source you're familiar with. This story could be the beginning of the end for Obama's campaign.
hey, don't count on Politico, but Drudge is a good idea! Once again, the Republicans are able to prove this is a FACT, while the Democrats just created a complete rumor with no proven credibility, regarding Palin and the Alaskan Independance party!
nonymous said...
ReplyDeleteI suppose Sen. Joe McCarthy is alive and well. Really, are we going to start witch-hunting again in this country? Even if true, this bit of information has zero bearing on Senator Obama's current political viewpoints, which focus on consensus building and understanding the views of others. Stick to the issues this country faces. There's more than enough mud that could be dug up about Sen. McCain which would "effectively end his campaign."
-----------------------------------
they only people guilty of witch hunting these days are the liberals!! Republicans just do this because they are constantly put on the defensive!! Truth be told, McCarthy had a very legitimate fear, he just went about it completly WRONG!
Another association that Obama claims didn't exist. Why can't he just be up front? I don't trust him one bit.
ReplyDeleteYou can find lots more of these articles by looking at the old 2001 Google index: http://www.google.com/search2001/search?q=obama+new+party&hl=en&sa=N
ReplyDeleteThere is something not being sufficiently focused on with regard to Obama’s connection with Ayers. That is this: think of the loss of credibility our nation will have in a war on terror, when its chief executive-- nay, its Commander in Chief-- has ties to, indeed launched his political career in the home of, a confessed and unrepentant domestic terrorist. The American people need to reflect soberly on the moral effect such an association will have on the legitimacy of our war against terrorism. If people don’t think that every terrorist state and organization in the world won’t make hay with that, they are delusional. It doesn’t even matter if Obama agrees with or condemns Ayers’ actions. The association is sufficient for the terrorists to exploit. Period. No one seems to be addressing the “why does it matter” aspect (beyond simply bad judgment). I’ve been doing my best to keep up with most of the articles on this subject through RCP, but I don’t think anyone has really driven this home. I really think this is the angle that needs to become a drum beat, and just hammered home until election day. It’s not guilt by association, it’s irreparable damage to our nation’s moral credibility in time of war against terrorist states and organizations.
ReplyDeleteSubject: About Obama Please READ.
ReplyDelete> This election has me very worried. So many things to
> consider. About a year ago I would have voted for Obama. I
> have changed my mind three times since than. I watch all
> the news channels, jumping from one to another. I must say
> this drives my husband crazy. But, I feel if you view
> MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News, you might get some middle ground
> to work with. About six months ago, I started thinking
> 'where did the money come from for Obama'. I have
> four daughters who went to College, and we were middle
> class, and money was tight. We (including my girls) worked
> hard and there were lots of student loans.
>
>
>
> I started looking into Obama's life.
>
>
>
> Around 1979 Obama started college at Occidental in
> California. He is very open about his two years at
> Occidental, he tried all kinds of drugs and was wasting his
> time but, even though he had a brilliant mind, did not apply
> himself to his studies. 'Barry' (that was the name
> he used all his life) during this time had two roommates,
> Muhammad Hasan Chandoo and Wahid Hamid, both from Pakistan.
> During the summer of 1981, after his second year in
> college, he made a 'round the world' trip.
> Stopping to see his mother in Indonesia, next Hyderabad in
> India, three weeks in Karachi, Pakistan where he stayed with
> his roommate's family, then off to Africa to visit his
> father's family. My question - Where did he get the
> money for this trip? Nether I, nor any one of my children
> would have had money for a trip like this when they where in
> college. When he came back he started school at Columbia
> University in New York. It is at this time he wants
> everyone
> to call him Barack - not Barry. Do you know what the
> tuition is at Columbia? It's not cheap to say the
> least! Where did he get money for tuition? Student
> Loans? Maybe. After Columbia, he went to Chicago to work as
> a Community Organizer for $12,000 a year. Why Chicago?
> Why not New York? He was already living in New York.
>
>
>
> By 'chance' he met Antoin 'Tony' Rezko,
> born in Aleppo Syria, and a real estate developer in
> Chicago. Rezko has been convicted of fraud and bribery
> this year. Rezko, was named 'Entrepreneur of the
> Decade' by the Arab-American Business and Professional
> Association'. About two years later, Obama entered
> Harvard Law School. Do you have any idea what tuition is
> for Harvard Law School? Where did he get the money for Law
> School? More student loans? After Law school, he went
> back to Chicago. Rezko offered him a job, which he turned
> down. But, he did take a job with Davis, Miner, Barnhill
> & Galland. Guess what? They represented
> 'Rezar' which is Rezko's firm. Rezko was one
> of Obama's first major financial contributors when he
> ran for office in Chicago. In 2003, Rezko threw an early
> fundraiser for Obama which Chicago Tribune reporter David
> Mendelland claims was instrumental in providing Obama with
> 'seed money' for his U.S. Senate race.
> In 2005, Obama purchased a new home in Kenwoood District
> of Chicago for $1.65 million (less than asking price).
> With ALL those Student Loans - Where did he get the money
> for the property? On the same day Rezko's wife, Rita,
> purchased the adjoining empty lot for full price. The London
> Times reported that Nadhmi Auchi, an Iraqi-born Billionaire
> loaned Rezko $3.5 million three weeks before Obama's new
> home was purchased. Obama met Nadhmi Auchi many times with
> Rezko.
>
>
>
> Now, we have Obama running for President. Valerie
> Jarrett, was Michele Obama's boss. She is now
> Obama's chief advisor and he does not make any major
> decisions without talking to her first. Where was Jarrett
> born? Ready for this? Shiraz, Iran! Do we see a pattern
> here? Or am I going crazy?
>
>
>
> On May 10, 2008 The Times reported, Robert Malley, advisor
> to Obama, was 'sacked' after the press found out he
> was having regular contacts with 'Hamas', which
> controls Gaza and is connected with Iran. This past week,
> buried in the back part of the papers, Iraqi newspapers
> reported that during Obama's visit to Iraq, he asked
> their leaders to do nothing about the war until after he is
> elected, and he will 'Take care of things'.
>
>
>
> Oh, and by the way, remember the college roommates that
> where born in Pakistan? They are in charge of all those
> 'small' Internet campaign contributions for Obama.
> Where is that money coming from? The poor and middle
> class in this country? Or could it be from the Middle
> East?
>
>
>
> And the final bit of news. On September 7, 2008, The
> Washington Times posted a verbal slip that was made on
> 'This Week' with George Stephanapoulos. Obama on
> talking about his religion said, 'My Muslim faith'.
> When questioned, 'he made a mistake'. Some
> mistake!
>
>
>
> All of the above information I got on line. If you would
> like to check it - Wikipedia, encyclopedia, Barack Obama;
> Tony Rezko; Valerie Jarrett: Daily Times - Obama visited
> Pakistan in 1981; The Washington Times - September 7, 2008;
> The Times May 10, 2008.
>
>
>
> Now the BIG question - If I found out all this information
> on my own, Why haven't all of our 'intelligent'
> members of the press been reporting this?
>
>
>
> A phrase that keeps ringing in my ear - 'Beware of the
> enemy from within'!!!>
What can we do! Can any one suggest what we are going to do or are we going to be like sheep lead to the slaughter? Give me suggestions. Is anyone doing anything? Sign, banners, marches?
ReplyDeleteObama.....The terrorists best friend!!
ReplyDeleteI have been following Obama and his ties to the New Party for months. They have scrubbed the archives pages just since this past Saturday. I emailed myself the information straight from the new Party pages. Please ready below at the bottom about their candidate Obama. This was written in 1997!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.populist.com/11.96.Edit.html (one more just for shits and grins...there's Obama in the 13th paragraph...
or maybe it's just a conspiracy to make it look like he was in it)
You can read this article:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/10/08/will-msm-report-obama-membership-socialist-new-party
Here's the NEW PARTY link page that has now been scrubbed, but not before I captured it and saved it in my archives. They can kiss my ass. In Chicago, it is politics as usual and I've followed the money.
http://web.archive.org/web/20010306031216/www.newparty.org/up9610.html
October 1996 Update:
Running to Win : The Key Races
New Party members are busy knocking on doors, hammering down lawn signs, and phoning voters to support NP candidates this fall. H ere are some of our key races:
Arkansas: The Little Rock New Party has a full slate of candidates up for election in November. LRNP steering committee member Michael Booker is running unopposed for re-election to the Arkansas State House. Two NP members - Paul Kelly and Genevieve Stewart - are running for at-large (city-wide) city council positions. And in a head-to-head battle between the New Party and the conservative right, NP member Jayne Cia faces the Arkansas state chair of Empower America (Jack Kemp and Bill Bennett's organization) for a Justice of the Peace (county board) position.
Illinois: Three NP-members won Democratic primaries last Spring and face off against Republican opponents on election day: Danny Davis (U.S. House), Barack Obama (State Senate) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary).
Maryland: Two New Party members are up for school board seats this fall: Doyle Niemann in Prince George's County and Dan Parr in Montgomery County.
Minnesota: Despite the successful effort by conservative Democratic Party forces to deny Progressive Minnesota the opportunity to use fusion this fall, the state legislative candidates that sought our nomination still see themselves as Progressive Minnesota candidates, and we're still backing them in the general election. PM/NP endorsed candidates include Ellen Anderson, Karen Clark, Andy Dawkins, Linda Higgins, and Sandy Pappas. Progre ssive Minnesota has also endorsed Green Party State Assembly candidate Cam Gordon.
New York: The New Party of Long Island is backing three candidates for office this Fall: State Assembly candidate Tom DiNapoli and Congressional candidates Carolyn McCarthy and Nora Bredes. NP members collected the necessary signatures to nominate progressive Democratic Assemblyman Tom DiNapoli on the New Party line, making this the first Democratic Party/New Party fusion effort. The chapter is supporting a major voter registration drive in African-American and Hispanic communities in McCarthy's district.
Washington, DC: DC New Democracy/NP is backing ten candidates for Advisory Neighborhood Commissions (Almedith Bass-Williams, John Jordan, Laine McRaney, Henry Fernandez, Todd Mosley, Daniel Rosenberg, Gerry Lorentz, Will Hill, Dennis Dolinger, Violet Hewlett), neighborhood-based councils that represent community concerns to the mayor and city council. In addition, DCND is recruiting candidates to run write-in campaigns in some of the 80-odd ANC races with no candidate.
Wisconsin: In addition to the four Progressive Milwaukee-backed candidates running for state office (Spencer Coggs, Dale Dulberger, Gwendolynne Moore, Johnnie Morris-Tatum, see Sept Update), two New Party members in Fox Valley are running for the state assembly. Progressive Fox Valley founder and chair Tony Palmeri is in a surprisingly close race against an four-term incumbent conservative Rep ublican in Oshkosh. New Party and AFSCME (American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees) member Corky Van Handel is also running for the state assembly in a nearby district. Both are running as Democrats.
Membership Growth
September was the New Party's all-time high month for membership recruitment - more than 1000 new members joined! Welcome aboard.
As always, onward and upward...
Go to top
Back to NP Home
© 1997 The New Party
All of these archives are now missing. Thank God I have them. At least I will have record and proof the guy was a member. He is a Socialist...there are no two ways about it.
ReplyDeleteSenator Obama clearly tipped his cards when his masked slipped in conversation with Joe the Plumber. When he stated the the by-line of socialism "spread the wealth around". He told Joe "I don't want to punish your success, I just want the people coming up behind you to be able to get a leg up". The problem is, Joe is the one trying to get a leg up! He hasn't bought the business yet! But Obama's policies are making him uncertain that he can indeed achieve the American dream while creating more jobs for other Americans. SOCIALISM IS THE DEATH OF THE AMERICAN DREAM!
ReplyDelete